Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience

Purpose: The authors assess the morbidity, functional results and oncologic follow-up of a series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomies performed in over a 10-year period. Material and Methods: The data on 780 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies performed between September 1997 and December 2007...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mirandolino B. Mariano, Marcos V. Tefilli, Gilvan N. Fonseca, Isidoro H. Goldraich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2009-10-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000500008
_version_ 1819207296822018048
author Mirandolino B. Mariano
Marcos V. Tefilli
Gilvan N. Fonseca
Isidoro H. Goldraich
author_facet Mirandolino B. Mariano
Marcos V. Tefilli
Gilvan N. Fonseca
Isidoro H. Goldraich
author_sort Mirandolino B. Mariano
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The authors assess the morbidity, functional results and oncologic follow-up of a series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomies performed in over a 10-year period. Material and Methods: The data on 780 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies performed between September 1997 and December 2007 were stored in a personal database. The following parameters are described and critically analyzed: operative time, blood transfusions, conversions, length of hospital stay, complications, functional results of sexual potency and urinary continence, surgical margins and oncologic follow-up. Results: Operative time averaged 125 minutes, with a mean bleeding volume of 335 mL and mean hospital stay of 4.3 days. The rate of conversion to open surgery was 1.36% and the overall complication rate was 14.24%. The pathology analysis showed pT2 tumors in 82.60% and pT3 tumors in 17.39% of cases. The overall positive margin rate was 19.58%, with a biochemical recurrence of 10.27% at a mean follow-up of 62.5 months. Urinary continence and sexual potency yielded rates of 88% and 61%, respectively, 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a technically well-defined procedure that provides good oncologic and functional results after proper training.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T05:21:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-671b503c5f474c8994d682e5513cd0df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-5538
1677-6119
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T05:21:15Z
publishDate 2009-10-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format Article
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-671b503c5f474c8994d682e5513cd0df2022-12-21T17:58:42ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-55381677-61192009-10-0135556557210.1590/S1677-55382009000500008Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experienceMirandolino B. MarianoMarcos V. TefilliGilvan N. FonsecaIsidoro H. GoldraichPurpose: The authors assess the morbidity, functional results and oncologic follow-up of a series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomies performed in over a 10-year period. Material and Methods: The data on 780 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies performed between September 1997 and December 2007 were stored in a personal database. The following parameters are described and critically analyzed: operative time, blood transfusions, conversions, length of hospital stay, complications, functional results of sexual potency and urinary continence, surgical margins and oncologic follow-up. Results: Operative time averaged 125 minutes, with a mean bleeding volume of 335 mL and mean hospital stay of 4.3 days. The rate of conversion to open surgery was 1.36% and the overall complication rate was 14.24%. The pathology analysis showed pT2 tumors in 82.60% and pT3 tumors in 17.39% of cases. The overall positive margin rate was 19.58%, with a biochemical recurrence of 10.27% at a mean follow-up of 62.5 months. Urinary continence and sexual potency yielded rates of 88% and 61%, respectively, 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a technically well-defined procedure that provides good oncologic and functional results after proper training.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000500008prostatic neoplamsprostatectomylaparoscopic surgeryoutcomes
spellingShingle Mirandolino B. Mariano
Marcos V. Tefilli
Gilvan N. Fonseca
Isidoro H. Goldraich
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
prostatic neoplams
prostatectomy
laparoscopic surgery
outcomes
title Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience
title_full Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience
title_short Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience
title_sort laparoscopic radical prostatectomy 10 years experience
topic prostatic neoplams
prostatectomy
laparoscopic surgery
outcomes
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382009000500008
work_keys_str_mv AT mirandolinobmariano laparoscopicradicalprostatectomy10yearsexperience
AT marcosvtefilli laparoscopicradicalprostatectomy10yearsexperience
AT gilvannfonseca laparoscopicradicalprostatectomy10yearsexperience
AT isidorohgoldraich laparoscopicradicalprostatectomy10yearsexperience