Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy

The article opposes the rejection of autonomy in favor of coercive paternalism. Based on the thought of especially John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant, and Joel Feinberg, it suggests that autonomy as an ideal, a moral capacity, and a foundational principle in liberal democracies must not be surrendered...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: University of Presov 2020-12-01
Series:Annales Scientia Politica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.unipo.sk/public/media/37568/01_ASP_2020_2_Wedekind.pdf
_version_ 1828891971952836608
author Peter
author_facet Peter
author_sort Peter
collection DOAJ
description The article opposes the rejection of autonomy in favor of coercive paternalism. Based on the thought of especially John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant, and Joel Feinberg, it suggests that autonomy as an ideal, a moral capacity, and a foundational principle in liberal democracies must not be surrendered for a doctrine of benevolent coercion. The arguments are equally concerned with the justifications for coercion, the value of autonomy and moral agency, and the dangers of paternalism (e.g. infantilization). The article concludes that Mill’s soft paternalism based on the harm principle could serve as a reasonable middle-ground allowing for the most severe types of self-harming behavior to be avoided without surrendering autonomy altogether.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T13:27:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-672afc836a8b4e4b9144feaeeaebd54c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1339-0732
language ces
last_indexed 2024-12-13T13:27:32Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher University of Presov
record_format Article
series Annales Scientia Politica
spelling doaj.art-672afc836a8b4e4b9144feaeeaebd54c2022-12-21T23:44:16ZcesUniversity of PresovAnnales Scientia Politica1339-07322020-12-0192515Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomyPeter0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4721-8897WedekindThe article opposes the rejection of autonomy in favor of coercive paternalism. Based on the thought of especially John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant, and Joel Feinberg, it suggests that autonomy as an ideal, a moral capacity, and a foundational principle in liberal democracies must not be surrendered for a doctrine of benevolent coercion. The arguments are equally concerned with the justifications for coercion, the value of autonomy and moral agency, and the dangers of paternalism (e.g. infantilization). The article concludes that Mill’s soft paternalism based on the harm principle could serve as a reasonable middle-ground allowing for the most severe types of self-harming behavior to be avoided without surrendering autonomy altogether.https://www.unipo.sk/public/media/37568/01_ASP_2020_2_Wedekind.pdfautonomycoercionharm-principleliberalismpaternalismrationality
spellingShingle Peter
Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy
Annales Scientia Politica
autonomy
coercion
harm-principle
liberalism
paternalism
rationality
title Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy
title_full Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy
title_fullStr Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy
title_full_unstemmed Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy
title_short Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy
title_sort against coercive paternalism a case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy
topic autonomy
coercion
harm-principle
liberalism
paternalism
rationality
url https://www.unipo.sk/public/media/37568/01_ASP_2020_2_Wedekind.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT peter againstcoercivepaternalismacaseforsoftpaternalismandthepreservationofautonomy