Against coercive paternalism: A case for soft paternalism and the preservation of autonomy
The article opposes the rejection of autonomy in favor of coercive paternalism. Based on the thought of especially John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant, and Joel Feinberg, it suggests that autonomy as an ideal, a moral capacity, and a foundational principle in liberal democracies must not be surrendered...
Main Author: | Peter |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ces |
Published: |
University of Presov
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Annales Scientia Politica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.unipo.sk/public/media/37568/01_ASP_2020_2_Wedekind.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Autonomy and paternalism
by: Westwell-Roper, Y, et al.
Published: (1985) -
What is wrong with anti-paternalism?
by: Sládeček Michal
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Paternalism vs. Autonomy: Are They Alternative Types of Formal Care?
by: Rocío Fernández-Ballesteros, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
The Ethics of Doping: Between Paternalism and Duty
by: Evangelos Protopapadakis
Published: (2020-12-01) -
ON THE PRESUMPTION OF PATERNITY AND THE NEGATION OF PATERNITY
by: Ciprian Raul ROMIȚAN
Published: (2021-05-01)