Clinical Assessment of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Memory Distress: Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundExposures to “traumatic” events are widespread and can cause posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cognitive behavioral therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) are frequently used and validated behavioral PTSD treatments. Despite demonstrate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nazanin Babaei, Camrie Kerry, Kisha Goode, Kevin Dang, Parsa Mirzadeh, Meysam Pirbaglou, Megan A Kirk, Paul Ritvo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2023-05-01
Series:JMIR Research Protocols
Online Access:https://www.researchprotocols.org/2023/1/e38552
_version_ 1797734166888972288
author Nazanin Babaei
Camrie Kerry
Kisha Goode
Kevin Dang
Parsa Mirzadeh
Meysam Pirbaglou
Megan A Kirk
Paul Ritvo
author_facet Nazanin Babaei
Camrie Kerry
Kisha Goode
Kevin Dang
Parsa Mirzadeh
Meysam Pirbaglou
Megan A Kirk
Paul Ritvo
author_sort Nazanin Babaei
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundExposures to “traumatic” events are widespread and can cause posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cognitive behavioral therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) are frequently used and validated behavioral PTSD treatments. Despite demonstrated effectiveness, highly upsetting memory reactions can be evoked, resulting in extensive distress and, sometimes, treatment dropout. In recent years, multiple treatment approaches have aimed at reducing such upsetting memory reactions to traumatic memories while therapeutic progress proceeds. One of these methods, the flash technique (FT), a modification of standard EMDR (S-EMDR), appears effective in distressing memory reduction. This study will examine FT-EMDR and S-EMDR efficacies when both methods are delivered via web-based video. ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the relative efficacy of (web-based) FT-EMDR versus S-EMDR in reducing the PTSD symptoms, anxieties, and depression associated with traumatic memories at postintervention and 1-month follow-up. MethodsThis double-blinded, web-based, 2-arm randomized controlled trial will employ self-report outcomes. A total of 90 participants will be identified from the web-based CloudResearch platform and randomly allocated to the experimental or comparison group. Inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) approved for engagement by the CloudResearch platform; (2) 25-60 years of age; (3) residing in Canada or the United States; (4) a recalled disturbing memory of an event >2 years ago that has not repeated and was moderately or more upsetting during occurrence; (5) memory moderately or more upsetting at baseline and not linked to an earlier memory that is equally or more than equally disturbing. Exclusion criteria are bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, substance abuse or addiction in the past 3 months, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt in the past 6 months. Interventions include guided video instruction of full FT or guided video of EMDR. Outcome measures are as follows: Primary outcome is PTSD symptoms that are measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5) at 1-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are State Anxiety subscale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory at baseline, postintervention, and 1-month follow-up; Trait Anxiety subscale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9); and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule measured at 1-month follow-up. ResultsIf, at 1-month follow-up, the web-based FT-EMDR intervention is more effective in reducing PTSD symptoms (as measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5) than EMDR, it may help reduce traumatic memory distress in multiple contexts. ConclusionsThis randomized controlled trial will advance current understandings of PTSD symptoms and interventions that target traumatic memory–related distress. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05262127; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05262127
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:40:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-672dfc5b3a61443195283cd003cc2618
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1929-0748
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:40:21Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Research Protocols
spelling doaj.art-672dfc5b3a61443195283cd003cc26182023-08-28T23:54:05ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482023-05-0112e3855210.2196/38552Clinical Assessment of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Memory Distress: Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled TrialNazanin Babaeihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-8236Camrie Kerryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8451-791XKisha Goodehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0278-1691Kevin Danghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-4238Parsa Mirzadehhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-4021Meysam Pirbaglouhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5951-9577Megan A Kirkhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-2177Paul Ritvohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1141-0083 BackgroundExposures to “traumatic” events are widespread and can cause posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cognitive behavioral therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) are frequently used and validated behavioral PTSD treatments. Despite demonstrated effectiveness, highly upsetting memory reactions can be evoked, resulting in extensive distress and, sometimes, treatment dropout. In recent years, multiple treatment approaches have aimed at reducing such upsetting memory reactions to traumatic memories while therapeutic progress proceeds. One of these methods, the flash technique (FT), a modification of standard EMDR (S-EMDR), appears effective in distressing memory reduction. This study will examine FT-EMDR and S-EMDR efficacies when both methods are delivered via web-based video. ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the relative efficacy of (web-based) FT-EMDR versus S-EMDR in reducing the PTSD symptoms, anxieties, and depression associated with traumatic memories at postintervention and 1-month follow-up. MethodsThis double-blinded, web-based, 2-arm randomized controlled trial will employ self-report outcomes. A total of 90 participants will be identified from the web-based CloudResearch platform and randomly allocated to the experimental or comparison group. Inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) approved for engagement by the CloudResearch platform; (2) 25-60 years of age; (3) residing in Canada or the United States; (4) a recalled disturbing memory of an event >2 years ago that has not repeated and was moderately or more upsetting during occurrence; (5) memory moderately or more upsetting at baseline and not linked to an earlier memory that is equally or more than equally disturbing. Exclusion criteria are bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, substance abuse or addiction in the past 3 months, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt in the past 6 months. Interventions include guided video instruction of full FT or guided video of EMDR. Outcome measures are as follows: Primary outcome is PTSD symptoms that are measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5) at 1-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are State Anxiety subscale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory at baseline, postintervention, and 1-month follow-up; Trait Anxiety subscale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9); and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule measured at 1-month follow-up. ResultsIf, at 1-month follow-up, the web-based FT-EMDR intervention is more effective in reducing PTSD symptoms (as measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5) than EMDR, it may help reduce traumatic memory distress in multiple contexts. ConclusionsThis randomized controlled trial will advance current understandings of PTSD symptoms and interventions that target traumatic memory–related distress. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05262127; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05262127https://www.researchprotocols.org/2023/1/e38552
spellingShingle Nazanin Babaei
Camrie Kerry
Kisha Goode
Kevin Dang
Parsa Mirzadeh
Meysam Pirbaglou
Megan A Kirk
Paul Ritvo
Clinical Assessment of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Memory Distress: Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
JMIR Research Protocols
title Clinical Assessment of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Memory Distress: Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Clinical Assessment of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Memory Distress: Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Clinical Assessment of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Memory Distress: Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Assessment of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Memory Distress: Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Clinical Assessment of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Memory Distress: Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort clinical assessment of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in memory distress protocol for a double blinded randomized controlled trial
url https://www.researchprotocols.org/2023/1/e38552
work_keys_str_mv AT nazaninbabaei clinicalassessmentofeyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessinginmemorydistressprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT camriekerry clinicalassessmentofeyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessinginmemorydistressprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kishagoode clinicalassessmentofeyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessinginmemorydistressprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kevindang clinicalassessmentofeyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessinginmemorydistressprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parsamirzadeh clinicalassessmentofeyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessinginmemorydistressprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meysampirbaglou clinicalassessmentofeyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessinginmemorydistressprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meganakirk clinicalassessmentofeyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessinginmemorydistressprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paulritvo clinicalassessmentofeyemovementdesensitizationandreprocessinginmemorydistressprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial