Robust Trust in Expert Testimony
The standard of proof in criminal trials should require that the evidence presented by the prosecution is robust. This requirement of robustness says that it must be unlikely that additional information would change the probability that the defendant is guilty. Robustness is difficult for a judge to...
Main Authors: | Christian Dahlman, Lena Wahlberg, Farhan Sarwar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente
2015-05-01
|
Series: | Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/79 |
Similar Items
-
Providing expert medical testimony
by: Bajić-Milosavljević Aleksandra, et al.
Published: (2005-01-01) -
The Work of Expert Testimony: Central Americans, Human Rights Defenders, and Immigration Courts
by: Allan F. Burns
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Medical expert testimony as conflict of interest regarding the onset of rheumatoid arthritis following trauma
by: Sherry DD
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Strengthening the Position of Expert Witness in Judicial Process
by: Indriati Amarini, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Epistemic Justification of Testimonial Beliefs and the Categories of Egophoricity and Evidentiality in Natural Languages: An Insoluble Paradox of Thomas Reid's Anti-Reductionism
by: Łukasiewicz Elżbieta
Published: (2020-06-01)