Whispers of Change (Vol. II)
<p>Mexico’s prolonged refusal to eliminate mandatory preventive detention from its legal system has slowly but steadily contributed to the rising tension between the Mexican Supreme Court, the Mexican State, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Following both Courts’ recent decisions...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2023-04-01
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/whispers-of-change-vol-ii/ |
_version_ | 1797844713101852672 |
---|---|
author | Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez Daniel Torres-Checa Sebastián Incháustegui |
author_facet | Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez Daniel Torres-Checa Sebastián Incháustegui |
author_sort | Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>Mexico’s prolonged refusal to eliminate mandatory preventive detention from its legal system has slowly but steadily contributed to the rising tension between the Mexican Supreme Court, the Mexican State, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Following both Courts’ recent decisions on the case of García Rodríguez y Alpízar Ortíz v. México (both have recently decided cases concerning virtually the same set of facts with notoriously varying outcomes), the discussion heats as it now relates to one of the most relevant inquiries of modern constitutional study: judicial review of constitutional provisions and amendments.</p>
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:27:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6747e919001d4348a3caad1a709e2226 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2366-7044 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:27:04Z |
publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
record_format | Article |
series | Verfassungsblog |
spelling | doaj.art-6747e919001d4348a3caad1a709e22262023-04-18T10:27:43ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442023-04-012366-7044Whispers of Change (Vol. II)Jaime Olaiz-GonzalezDaniel Torres-ChecaSebastián Incháustegui<p>Mexico’s prolonged refusal to eliminate mandatory preventive detention from its legal system has slowly but steadily contributed to the rising tension between the Mexican Supreme Court, the Mexican State, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Following both Courts’ recent decisions on the case of García Rodríguez y Alpízar Ortíz v. México (both have recently decided cases concerning virtually the same set of facts with notoriously varying outcomes), the discussion heats as it now relates to one of the most relevant inquiries of modern constitutional study: judicial review of constitutional provisions and amendments.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/whispers-of-change-vol-ii/Constitutional Change, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Human Rights System, Judicial Review, Mexican Supreme Court, Preventive Detention |
spellingShingle | Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez Daniel Torres-Checa Sebastián Incháustegui Whispers of Change (Vol. II) Verfassungsblog Constitutional Change, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Human Rights System, Judicial Review, Mexican Supreme Court, Preventive Detention |
title | Whispers of Change (Vol. II) |
title_full | Whispers of Change (Vol. II) |
title_fullStr | Whispers of Change (Vol. II) |
title_full_unstemmed | Whispers of Change (Vol. II) |
title_short | Whispers of Change (Vol. II) |
title_sort | whispers of change vol ii |
topic | Constitutional Change, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Human Rights System, Judicial Review, Mexican Supreme Court, Preventive Detention |
url | https://verfassungsblog.de/whispers-of-change-vol-ii/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaimeolaizgonzalez whispersofchangevolii AT danieltorrescheca whispersofchangevolii AT sebastianinchaustegui whispersofchangevolii |