Whispers of Change (Vol. II)

<p>Mexico’s prolonged refusal to eliminate mandatory preventive detention from its legal system has slowly but steadily contributed to the rising tension between the Mexican Supreme Court, the Mexican State, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Following both Courts’ recent decisions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez, Daniel Torres-Checa, Sebastián Incháustegui
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH 2023-04-01
Series:Verfassungsblog
Subjects:
Online Access:https://verfassungsblog.de/whispers-of-change-vol-ii/
_version_ 1797844713101852672
author Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez
Daniel Torres-Checa
Sebastián Incháustegui
author_facet Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez
Daniel Torres-Checa
Sebastián Incháustegui
author_sort Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez
collection DOAJ
description <p>Mexico’s prolonged refusal to eliminate mandatory preventive detention from its legal system has slowly but steadily contributed to the rising tension between the Mexican Supreme Court, the Mexican State, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Following both Courts’ recent decisions on the case of García Rodríguez y Alpízar Ortíz v. México (both have recently decided cases concerning virtually the same set of facts with notoriously varying outcomes), the discussion heats as it now relates to one of the most relevant inquiries of modern constitutional study: judicial review of constitutional provisions and amendments.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:27:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6747e919001d4348a3caad1a709e2226
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2366-7044
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:27:04Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
record_format Article
series Verfassungsblog
spelling doaj.art-6747e919001d4348a3caad1a709e22262023-04-18T10:27:43ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442023-04-012366-7044Whispers of Change (Vol. II)Jaime Olaiz-GonzalezDaniel Torres-ChecaSebastián Incháustegui<p>Mexico’s prolonged refusal to eliminate mandatory preventive detention from its legal system has slowly but steadily contributed to the rising tension between the Mexican Supreme Court, the Mexican State, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Following both Courts’ recent decisions on the case of García Rodríguez y Alpízar Ortíz v. México (both have recently decided cases concerning virtually the same set of facts with notoriously varying outcomes), the discussion heats as it now relates to one of the most relevant inquiries of modern constitutional study: judicial review of constitutional provisions and amendments.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/whispers-of-change-vol-ii/Constitutional Change, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Human Rights System, Judicial Review, Mexican Supreme Court, Preventive Detention
spellingShingle Jaime Olaiz-Gonzalez
Daniel Torres-Checa
Sebastián Incháustegui
Whispers of Change (Vol. II)
Verfassungsblog
Constitutional Change, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Human Rights System, Judicial Review, Mexican Supreme Court, Preventive Detention
title Whispers of Change (Vol. II)
title_full Whispers of Change (Vol. II)
title_fullStr Whispers of Change (Vol. II)
title_full_unstemmed Whispers of Change (Vol. II)
title_short Whispers of Change (Vol. II)
title_sort whispers of change vol ii
topic Constitutional Change, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Human Rights System, Judicial Review, Mexican Supreme Court, Preventive Detention
url https://verfassungsblog.de/whispers-of-change-vol-ii/
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimeolaizgonzalez whispersofchangevolii
AT danieltorrescheca whispersofchangevolii
AT sebastianinchaustegui whispersofchangevolii