Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison

Background: To analyze objective and subjective visual quality differences between descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultra-thin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a paired contralateral-eye design. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and ob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josep Torras-Sanvicens, Irene Blanco-Domínguez, José-María Sánchez-González, Rahul Rachwani-Anil, Juan-Felipe Spencer, Noelia Sabater-Cruz, Jorge Peraza-Nieves, Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/419
_version_ 1797408439802003456
author Josep Torras-Sanvicens
Irene Blanco-Domínguez
José-María Sánchez-González
Rahul Rachwani-Anil
Juan-Felipe Spencer
Noelia Sabater-Cruz
Jorge Peraza-Nieves
Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
author_facet Josep Torras-Sanvicens
Irene Blanco-Domínguez
José-María Sánchez-González
Rahul Rachwani-Anil
Juan-Felipe Spencer
Noelia Sabater-Cruz
Jorge Peraza-Nieves
Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
author_sort Josep Torras-Sanvicens
collection DOAJ
description Background: To analyze objective and subjective visual quality differences between descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultra-thin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a paired contralateral-eye design. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and observational case series study between DMEK and UT-DSAEK were presented. Visual acuity, refractive status and corneal quality assessment were compared between both endothelial keratoplasty techniques. The sample consisted of 20 eyes (10 patients) diagnosed with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. All measurements were performed preoperatively and at six months after surgery. Analyzed data included the measurement of objective scattering index, modulation transfer function, Strehl ratio, and optical quality assessment (OQAS) values. Contrast sensitivity, subjective patient satisfaction, visual acuity, tomography, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, and refraction status were also analyzed. Results: Objective and subjective visual quality variables had similar results among UT-DSAEK and DMEK procedures. Statistically significant differences favoring DMEK against UT-DSAEK were found in endothelial cell density (658.80 ± 139.33 and 1059.00 ± 421.84 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively), pachymetry (621.20 ± 33.74 and 529.70 ± 30.00 µm, respectively), and follow-up (45.50 ± 24.76 and 15.50 ± 8.43 months, respectively). Conclusions: UT-DSAEK and DMEK revealed no differences in terms of objective and subjective visual quality. However, DMEK showed a faster recovery during the follow-up, increased endothelial cell density, lower pachymetry, and a more anatomical posterior keratometry against UT-DSAEK in this case series paired-eye study.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:58:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-674f7d5b96154917840aedd2699fac3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:58:31Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-674f7d5b96154917840aedd2699fac3c2023-12-03T14:16:22ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-01-0110341910.3390/jcm10030419Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye ComparisonJosep Torras-Sanvicens0Irene Blanco-Domínguez1José-María Sánchez-González2Rahul Rachwani-Anil3Juan-Felipe Spencer4Noelia Sabater-Cruz5Jorge Peraza-Nieves6Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada7Anterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainPhysics of Condensed Matter Department, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, SpainOphthalmology Department, Regional Universitary Hospital of Malaga, 29010 Malaga, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainBackground: To analyze objective and subjective visual quality differences between descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultra-thin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a paired contralateral-eye design. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and observational case series study between DMEK and UT-DSAEK were presented. Visual acuity, refractive status and corneal quality assessment were compared between both endothelial keratoplasty techniques. The sample consisted of 20 eyes (10 patients) diagnosed with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. All measurements were performed preoperatively and at six months after surgery. Analyzed data included the measurement of objective scattering index, modulation transfer function, Strehl ratio, and optical quality assessment (OQAS) values. Contrast sensitivity, subjective patient satisfaction, visual acuity, tomography, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, and refraction status were also analyzed. Results: Objective and subjective visual quality variables had similar results among UT-DSAEK and DMEK procedures. Statistically significant differences favoring DMEK against UT-DSAEK were found in endothelial cell density (658.80 ± 139.33 and 1059.00 ± 421.84 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively), pachymetry (621.20 ± 33.74 and 529.70 ± 30.00 µm, respectively), and follow-up (45.50 ± 24.76 and 15.50 ± 8.43 months, respectively). Conclusions: UT-DSAEK and DMEK revealed no differences in terms of objective and subjective visual quality. However, DMEK showed a faster recovery during the follow-up, increased endothelial cell density, lower pachymetry, and a more anatomical posterior keratometry against UT-DSAEK in this case series paired-eye study.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/419ultra-thin DSAEKDMEKendothelial keratoplastyobjective visual qualitysubjective visual qualityFuchs endothelial dystrophy
spellingShingle Josep Torras-Sanvicens
Irene Blanco-Domínguez
José-María Sánchez-González
Rahul Rachwani-Anil
Juan-Felipe Spencer
Noelia Sabater-Cruz
Jorge Peraza-Nieves
Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison
Journal of Clinical Medicine
ultra-thin DSAEK
DMEK
endothelial keratoplasty
objective visual quality
subjective visual quality
Fuchs endothelial dystrophy
title Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison
title_full Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison
title_fullStr Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison
title_short Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison
title_sort visual quality and subjective satisfaction in ultrathin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty ut dsaek versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dmek a fellow eye comparison
topic ultra-thin DSAEK
DMEK
endothelial keratoplasty
objective visual quality
subjective visual quality
Fuchs endothelial dystrophy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/419
work_keys_str_mv AT joseptorrassanvicens visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison
AT ireneblancodominguez visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison
AT josemariasanchezgonzalez visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison
AT rahulrachwanianil visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison
AT juanfelipespencer visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison
AT noeliasabatercruz visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison
AT jorgeperazanieves visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison
AT carlosrochadelossada visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison