Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison
Background: To analyze objective and subjective visual quality differences between descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultra-thin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a paired contralateral-eye design. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and ob...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/419 |
_version_ | 1797408439802003456 |
---|---|
author | Josep Torras-Sanvicens Irene Blanco-Domínguez José-María Sánchez-González Rahul Rachwani-Anil Juan-Felipe Spencer Noelia Sabater-Cruz Jorge Peraza-Nieves Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada |
author_facet | Josep Torras-Sanvicens Irene Blanco-Domínguez José-María Sánchez-González Rahul Rachwani-Anil Juan-Felipe Spencer Noelia Sabater-Cruz Jorge Peraza-Nieves Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada |
author_sort | Josep Torras-Sanvicens |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: To analyze objective and subjective visual quality differences between descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultra-thin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a paired contralateral-eye design. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and observational case series study between DMEK and UT-DSAEK were presented. Visual acuity, refractive status and corneal quality assessment were compared between both endothelial keratoplasty techniques. The sample consisted of 20 eyes (10 patients) diagnosed with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. All measurements were performed preoperatively and at six months after surgery. Analyzed data included the measurement of objective scattering index, modulation transfer function, Strehl ratio, and optical quality assessment (OQAS) values. Contrast sensitivity, subjective patient satisfaction, visual acuity, tomography, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, and refraction status were also analyzed. Results: Objective and subjective visual quality variables had similar results among UT-DSAEK and DMEK procedures. Statistically significant differences favoring DMEK against UT-DSAEK were found in endothelial cell density (658.80 ± 139.33 and 1059.00 ± 421.84 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively), pachymetry (621.20 ± 33.74 and 529.70 ± 30.00 µm, respectively), and follow-up (45.50 ± 24.76 and 15.50 ± 8.43 months, respectively). Conclusions: UT-DSAEK and DMEK revealed no differences in terms of objective and subjective visual quality. However, DMEK showed a faster recovery during the follow-up, increased endothelial cell density, lower pachymetry, and a more anatomical posterior keratometry against UT-DSAEK in this case series paired-eye study. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:58:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-674f7d5b96154917840aedd2699fac3c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2077-0383 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:58:31Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-674f7d5b96154917840aedd2699fac3c2023-12-03T14:16:22ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-01-0110341910.3390/jcm10030419Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye ComparisonJosep Torras-Sanvicens0Irene Blanco-Domínguez1José-María Sánchez-González2Rahul Rachwani-Anil3Juan-Felipe Spencer4Noelia Sabater-Cruz5Jorge Peraza-Nieves6Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada7Anterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainPhysics of Condensed Matter Department, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, SpainOphthalmology Department, Regional Universitary Hospital of Malaga, 29010 Malaga, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainBackground: To analyze objective and subjective visual quality differences between descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and ultra-thin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a paired contralateral-eye design. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and observational case series study between DMEK and UT-DSAEK were presented. Visual acuity, refractive status and corneal quality assessment were compared between both endothelial keratoplasty techniques. The sample consisted of 20 eyes (10 patients) diagnosed with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. All measurements were performed preoperatively and at six months after surgery. Analyzed data included the measurement of objective scattering index, modulation transfer function, Strehl ratio, and optical quality assessment (OQAS) values. Contrast sensitivity, subjective patient satisfaction, visual acuity, tomography, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, and refraction status were also analyzed. Results: Objective and subjective visual quality variables had similar results among UT-DSAEK and DMEK procedures. Statistically significant differences favoring DMEK against UT-DSAEK were found in endothelial cell density (658.80 ± 139.33 and 1059.00 ± 421.84 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively), pachymetry (621.20 ± 33.74 and 529.70 ± 30.00 µm, respectively), and follow-up (45.50 ± 24.76 and 15.50 ± 8.43 months, respectively). Conclusions: UT-DSAEK and DMEK revealed no differences in terms of objective and subjective visual quality. However, DMEK showed a faster recovery during the follow-up, increased endothelial cell density, lower pachymetry, and a more anatomical posterior keratometry against UT-DSAEK in this case series paired-eye study.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/419ultra-thin DSAEKDMEKendothelial keratoplastyobjective visual qualitysubjective visual qualityFuchs endothelial dystrophy |
spellingShingle | Josep Torras-Sanvicens Irene Blanco-Domínguez José-María Sánchez-González Rahul Rachwani-Anil Juan-Felipe Spencer Noelia Sabater-Cruz Jorge Peraza-Nieves Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison Journal of Clinical Medicine ultra-thin DSAEK DMEK endothelial keratoplasty objective visual quality subjective visual quality Fuchs endothelial dystrophy |
title | Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison |
title_full | Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison |
title_fullStr | Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison |
title_short | Visual Quality and Subjective Satisfaction in Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Fellow-Eye Comparison |
title_sort | visual quality and subjective satisfaction in ultrathin descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty ut dsaek versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dmek a fellow eye comparison |
topic | ultra-thin DSAEK DMEK endothelial keratoplasty objective visual quality subjective visual quality Fuchs endothelial dystrophy |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/3/419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joseptorrassanvicens visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison AT ireneblancodominguez visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison AT josemariasanchezgonzalez visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison AT rahulrachwanianil visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison AT juanfelipespencer visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison AT noeliasabatercruz visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison AT jorgeperazanieves visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison AT carlosrochadelossada visualqualityandsubjectivesatisfactioninultrathindescemetstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyutdsaekversusdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmekafelloweyecomparison |