Intermediary in a Collective Labor Dispute Resolution

Collective labor disputes based on the differences in economic interests between workers and employers can be effectively resolved exclusively through conciliation procedures. Contemporary alternative methods arose mostly due to the necessity to resolve collective labor disputes; mediation for this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Zaitseva, E. Gomes, S. Racheva, V. Cruz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Publshing House V.Ема 2019-06-01
Series:BRICS Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/234
_version_ 1797855885054181376
author L. Zaitseva
E. Gomes
S. Racheva
V. Cruz
author_facet L. Zaitseva
E. Gomes
S. Racheva
V. Cruz
author_sort L. Zaitseva
collection DOAJ
description Collective labor disputes based on the differences in economic interests between workers and employers can be effectively resolved exclusively through conciliation procedures. Contemporary alternative methods arose mostly due to the necessity to resolve collective labor disputes; mediation for this purpose is applied differently in various countries. National legislation equally provides various means for collective labor dispute resolutions and determines relevant intermediary procedures. An intermediation in a collective labor dispute resolution can be private and/or state-appointed and mandatory or alternative and remains a very perspective means of alternative dispute resolution. An analysis of different countries’ legislation distinguishes several common features of intermediation in collective labor disputes, concerning mainly the goals, objectives and principles. For bodies and persons conducting intermediation, the degree of compulsion in their decisions varies greatly from country to country. However, the obtained experience reveals common and distinctive procedural features and provides the possibility to classify existing approaches, having combined them into groups. The analysis also follows general development trends of collective labor dispute intermediation in different countries and identifies several shortcomings that are characteristic to different systems of intermediation legal regulation. Further research on the most effective ways of collective labor dispute conciliation is necessary for establishing new harmonious labor relations as the grounds for social progress.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T20:30:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6750beed052748e89a3bd5dffecf9976
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2409-9058
2412-2343
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T20:30:03Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Publshing House V.Ема
record_format Article
series BRICS Law Journal
spelling doaj.art-6750beed052748e89a3bd5dffecf99762023-03-30T20:04:01ZengPublshing House V.ЕмаBRICS Law Journal2409-90582412-23432019-06-0162335910.21684/2412-2343-2019-6-2-33-59132Intermediary in a Collective Labor Dispute ResolutionL. Zaitseva0E. Gomes1S. Racheva2V. Cruz3Tyumen State UniversityFluminense Federal UniversityTyumen State UniversityFederal University of Rio de JaneiroCollective labor disputes based on the differences in economic interests between workers and employers can be effectively resolved exclusively through conciliation procedures. Contemporary alternative methods arose mostly due to the necessity to resolve collective labor disputes; mediation for this purpose is applied differently in various countries. National legislation equally provides various means for collective labor dispute resolutions and determines relevant intermediary procedures. An intermediation in a collective labor dispute resolution can be private and/or state-appointed and mandatory or alternative and remains a very perspective means of alternative dispute resolution. An analysis of different countries’ legislation distinguishes several common features of intermediation in collective labor disputes, concerning mainly the goals, objectives and principles. For bodies and persons conducting intermediation, the degree of compulsion in their decisions varies greatly from country to country. However, the obtained experience reveals common and distinctive procedural features and provides the possibility to classify existing approaches, having combined them into groups. The analysis also follows general development trends of collective labor dispute intermediation in different countries and identifies several shortcomings that are characteristic to different systems of intermediation legal regulation. Further research on the most effective ways of collective labor dispute conciliation is necessary for establishing new harmonious labor relations as the grounds for social progress.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/234alternative dispute resolution (adr)intermediationcollective labor disputeconciliation procedurestate-private mediation system
spellingShingle L. Zaitseva
E. Gomes
S. Racheva
V. Cruz
Intermediary in a Collective Labor Dispute Resolution
BRICS Law Journal
alternative dispute resolution (adr)
intermediation
collective labor dispute
conciliation procedure
state-private mediation system
title Intermediary in a Collective Labor Dispute Resolution
title_full Intermediary in a Collective Labor Dispute Resolution
title_fullStr Intermediary in a Collective Labor Dispute Resolution
title_full_unstemmed Intermediary in a Collective Labor Dispute Resolution
title_short Intermediary in a Collective Labor Dispute Resolution
title_sort intermediary in a collective labor dispute resolution
topic alternative dispute resolution (adr)
intermediation
collective labor dispute
conciliation procedure
state-private mediation system
url https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/234
work_keys_str_mv AT lzaitseva intermediaryinacollectivelabordisputeresolution
AT egomes intermediaryinacollectivelabordisputeresolution
AT sracheva intermediaryinacollectivelabordisputeresolution
AT vcruz intermediaryinacollectivelabordisputeresolution