Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations

A growing body of scholarship draws attention to prisons and environmental justice, pointing out the propensity for prisons to be located on contaminated sites and to be in close proximity to polluting industries, as well as for prisons themselves to contribute to local environmental degradation. Pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dominique Moran, Jacob A. Jordaan, Phil I. Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/223
_version_ 1797297675732779008
author Dominique Moran
Jacob A. Jordaan
Phil I. Jones
author_facet Dominique Moran
Jacob A. Jordaan
Phil I. Jones
author_sort Dominique Moran
collection DOAJ
description A growing body of scholarship draws attention to prisons and environmental justice, pointing out the propensity for prisons to be located on contaminated sites and to be in close proximity to polluting industries, as well as for prisons themselves to contribute to local environmental degradation. Prisoners’ immobility renders them unable to relocate away from harmful environments, and there are now numerous suggestions that their wellbeing suffers as a result of the poor quality of many local environments. However, since a relationship between environmental quality and prisoner wellbeing is yet to be robustly demonstrated, there is currently no firm evidence base from which to argue for positive change. This paper therefore examines the effect of the environmental quality of the locations of prisons, approximated as the presence of greenspace in the immediate vicinity of prisons, local species biodiversity and local levels of air and noise pollution, on wellbeing outcomes in a set of prisons in England and Wales. It finds that good environmental quality, in the form of high biodiversity and/or low air pollution, enhances the already-recognized positive effects of greenspace on the wellbeing of incarcerated populations. On the basis of these findings, this paper makes evidence-based policy recommendations intended to enhance the wellbeing of incarcerated populations.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:24:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-67576a3d3d154fc2a5e38d0a820e6b52
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:24:45Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-67576a3d3d154fc2a5e38d0a820e6b522024-02-23T15:24:14ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2024-02-0113222310.3390/land13020223Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated PopulationsDominique Moran0Jacob A. Jordaan1Phil I. Jones2School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKUtrecht University School of Economics, Utrecht University, Kriekenpitplein 21-22, 3584 EC Utrecht, The NetherlandsSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKA growing body of scholarship draws attention to prisons and environmental justice, pointing out the propensity for prisons to be located on contaminated sites and to be in close proximity to polluting industries, as well as for prisons themselves to contribute to local environmental degradation. Prisoners’ immobility renders them unable to relocate away from harmful environments, and there are now numerous suggestions that their wellbeing suffers as a result of the poor quality of many local environments. However, since a relationship between environmental quality and prisoner wellbeing is yet to be robustly demonstrated, there is currently no firm evidence base from which to argue for positive change. This paper therefore examines the effect of the environmental quality of the locations of prisons, approximated as the presence of greenspace in the immediate vicinity of prisons, local species biodiversity and local levels of air and noise pollution, on wellbeing outcomes in a set of prisons in England and Wales. It finds that good environmental quality, in the form of high biodiversity and/or low air pollution, enhances the already-recognized positive effects of greenspace on the wellbeing of incarcerated populations. On the basis of these findings, this paper makes evidence-based policy recommendations intended to enhance the wellbeing of incarcerated populations.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/223prisonbiodiversitywellbeingplanning
spellingShingle Dominique Moran
Jacob A. Jordaan
Phil I. Jones
Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations
Land
prison
biodiversity
wellbeing
planning
title Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations
title_full Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations
title_fullStr Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations
title_full_unstemmed Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations
title_short Toxic Prisons? Local Environmental Quality and the Wellbeing of Incarcerated Populations
title_sort toxic prisons local environmental quality and the wellbeing of incarcerated populations
topic prison
biodiversity
wellbeing
planning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/223
work_keys_str_mv AT dominiquemoran toxicprisonslocalenvironmentalqualityandthewellbeingofincarceratedpopulations
AT jacobajordaan toxicprisonslocalenvironmentalqualityandthewellbeingofincarceratedpopulations
AT philijones toxicprisonslocalenvironmentalqualityandthewellbeingofincarceratedpopulations