Evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoir

Imbibition is believed to be beneficial to the production. However, the load recovery is low, and water blocking can have a marked impact on the production This study aims to evaluate imbibition and water blocking behavior in tight reservoir, and reveal the impact of micro pore structure on imbibiti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fengpeng Lai, Zhiping Li, Wei Guo, Ya Meng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-11-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722019795
_version_ 1797901869590249472
author Fengpeng Lai
Zhiping Li
Wei Guo
Ya Meng
author_facet Fengpeng Lai
Zhiping Li
Wei Guo
Ya Meng
author_sort Fengpeng Lai
collection DOAJ
description Imbibition is believed to be beneficial to the production. However, the load recovery is low, and water blocking can have a marked impact on the production This study aims to evaluate imbibition and water blocking behavior in tight reservoir, and reveal the impact of micro pore structure on imbibition and water blocking. Low-pressure nitrogen gas adsorption (LP-N2GA), high-pressure mercury injection (HPMI), rate-controlled mercury injection, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), imbibition experiments and centrifugal experiments were comprehensive used. Micro pore structural characteristics and the distribution of fracturing fluid in pores were examined. The fluid can enter the small mesopores first or the mesopores first. Imbibition recovery (IR) range is 35.82% to 94.17%, and average is 63.63%. After centrifugation, irreducible water saturation (Swir) range is 3.43% to 57.84%, with an average of 17.28%. Permeability damage rate range is 15.19% to 97.86%, with an average rate of 51.88%. Factors that affecting IR include average pore throat ratio (APTR), specific surface area (SSA), permeability, porosity, pore volume (PV), average throat radius (ATR) and average pore radius (APR). Factors affecting water blocking include permeability, APR, ATR, porosity, PV, APTR and SSA. Permeability has the maximum impact on fluid distribution and flow, followed by APTR, porosity, and APR.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:08:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6758e0fecff1492f9bea0d109c59c78b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-4847
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:08:46Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Energy Reports
spelling doaj.art-6758e0fecff1492f9bea0d109c59c78b2023-02-21T05:14:04ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472022-11-0181383713847Evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoirFengpeng Lai0Zhiping Li1Wei Guo2Ya Meng3School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Geological Evaluation and Development Engineering, Beijing 100083, China; Correspondence to: Petroleum Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Geological Evaluation and Development Engineering, Beijing 100083, ChinaGeology Research Institute of GWDC, PetroChina, Panjing 124010, ChinaSchool of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Geological Evaluation and Development Engineering, Beijing 100083, ChinaImbibition is believed to be beneficial to the production. However, the load recovery is low, and water blocking can have a marked impact on the production This study aims to evaluate imbibition and water blocking behavior in tight reservoir, and reveal the impact of micro pore structure on imbibition and water blocking. Low-pressure nitrogen gas adsorption (LP-N2GA), high-pressure mercury injection (HPMI), rate-controlled mercury injection, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), imbibition experiments and centrifugal experiments were comprehensive used. Micro pore structural characteristics and the distribution of fracturing fluid in pores were examined. The fluid can enter the small mesopores first or the mesopores first. Imbibition recovery (IR) range is 35.82% to 94.17%, and average is 63.63%. After centrifugation, irreducible water saturation (Swir) range is 3.43% to 57.84%, with an average of 17.28%. Permeability damage rate range is 15.19% to 97.86%, with an average rate of 51.88%. Factors that affecting IR include average pore throat ratio (APTR), specific surface area (SSA), permeability, porosity, pore volume (PV), average throat radius (ATR) and average pore radius (APR). Factors affecting water blocking include permeability, APR, ATR, porosity, PV, APTR and SSA. Permeability has the maximum impact on fluid distribution and flow, followed by APTR, porosity, and APR.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722019795Tight reservoirWater blockingImbibitionPore structureFluid distribution
spellingShingle Fengpeng Lai
Zhiping Li
Wei Guo
Ya Meng
Evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoir
Energy Reports
Tight reservoir
Water blocking
Imbibition
Pore structure
Fluid distribution
title Evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoir
title_full Evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoir
title_fullStr Evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoir
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoir
title_short Evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoir
title_sort evaluation of fracturing fluid imbibition and water blocking behavior in unconventional reservoir
topic Tight reservoir
Water blocking
Imbibition
Pore structure
Fluid distribution
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722019795
work_keys_str_mv AT fengpenglai evaluationoffracturingfluidimbibitionandwaterblockingbehaviorinunconventionalreservoir
AT zhipingli evaluationoffracturingfluidimbibitionandwaterblockingbehaviorinunconventionalreservoir
AT weiguo evaluationoffracturingfluidimbibitionandwaterblockingbehaviorinunconventionalreservoir
AT yameng evaluationoffracturingfluidimbibitionandwaterblockingbehaviorinunconventionalreservoir