ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

Science is justly admired as a cumulative process (“standing on the shoulders of giants”), yet scientific knowledge is typically built on a patchwork of research contributions without much coordination. This lack of efficiency has specifically been addressed in clinical research by recommendations f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Judith ter Schure, Peter Grünwald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2022-05-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/11-549/v1
_version_ 1798029244361605120
author Judith ter Schure
Peter Grünwald
author_facet Judith ter Schure
Peter Grünwald
author_sort Judith ter Schure
collection DOAJ
description Science is justly admired as a cumulative process (“standing on the shoulders of giants”), yet scientific knowledge is typically built on a patchwork of research contributions without much coordination. This lack of efficiency has specifically been addressed in clinical research by recommendations for living systematic reviews and against research waste. We propose to further those recommendations with ALL-IN meta-analysis: Anytime Live and Leading INterim meta-analysis. ALL-IN provides statistical methodology for a meta-analysis that can be updated at any time—reanalyzing after each new observation while retaining type-I error guarantees, live—no need to prespecify the looks, and leading—in the decisions on whether individual studies should be initiated, stopped or expanded, the meta-analysis can be the leading source of information. We illustrate the method for time-to-event data, showing how synthesizing data at interim stages of studies can increase efficiency when studies are slow in themselves to provide the necessary number of events for completion. The meta-analysis can be performed on interim data, but does not have to. The analysis design requires no information about the number of patients in trials or the number of trials eventually included. So it can breathe life into living systematic reviews, through better and simpler statistics, efficiency, collaboration and communication
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:22:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-676f52e308d74353b3eba4c086b8566e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-1402
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:22:11Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series F1000Research
spelling doaj.art-676f52e308d74353b3eba4c086b8566e2022-12-22T04:07:17ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022022-05-011177953ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]Judith ter Schure0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-5510Peter Grünwald1Machine Learning, CWI, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsMachine Learning, CWI, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsScience is justly admired as a cumulative process (“standing on the shoulders of giants”), yet scientific knowledge is typically built on a patchwork of research contributions without much coordination. This lack of efficiency has specifically been addressed in clinical research by recommendations for living systematic reviews and against research waste. We propose to further those recommendations with ALL-IN meta-analysis: Anytime Live and Leading INterim meta-analysis. ALL-IN provides statistical methodology for a meta-analysis that can be updated at any time—reanalyzing after each new observation while retaining type-I error guarantees, live—no need to prespecify the looks, and leading—in the decisions on whether individual studies should be initiated, stopped or expanded, the meta-analysis can be the leading source of information. We illustrate the method for time-to-event data, showing how synthesizing data at interim stages of studies can increase efficiency when studies are slow in themselves to provide the necessary number of events for completion. The meta-analysis can be performed on interim data, but does not have to. The analysis design requires no information about the number of patients in trials or the number of trials eventually included. So it can breathe life into living systematic reviews, through better and simpler statistics, efficiency, collaboration and communicationhttps://f1000research.com/articles/11-549/v1Anytime Live Leading Interim Meta-analysis Efficiencyeng
spellingShingle Judith ter Schure
Peter Grünwald
ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
F1000Research
Anytime
Live
Leading
Interim
Meta-analysis
Efficiency
eng
title ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_full ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_fullStr ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_full_unstemmed ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_short ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
title_sort all in meta analysis breathing life into living systematic reviews version 1 peer review 1 approved 2 approved with reservations
topic Anytime
Live
Leading
Interim
Meta-analysis
Efficiency
eng
url https://f1000research.com/articles/11-549/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT judithterschure allinmetaanalysisbreathinglifeintolivingsystematicreviewsversion1peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations
AT petergrunwald allinmetaanalysisbreathinglifeintolivingsystematicreviewsversion1peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations