Clinical Comparative Study for Validation of Digital Impression Reliability with the Gypsum Check: A Simple and Fast Way to Evaluate the Trueness and Accuracy of Implant-Supported Rehabilitation
Despite many advantages, digital impressions, when compared to the conventional one, produce contrasting results and their complete substitution is still under debate. This comparative study aims to test a way to perform a clinical evaluation of digital impression Accuracy and Trueness with a gypsum...
Main Authors: | Giuseppe Barile, Giovanni de Rosa, Paride Papadia, Giovannino Muci, Saverio Capodiferro, Massimo Corsalini |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-06-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/13/7358 |
Similar Items
-
Evaluating the accuracy (precision and trueness) of conventional and digital Intraoral Impression Technique.
by: Lana Shwan Jalal, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions
by: Emad A. Albdour, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Solid index versus intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: in vitro trueness evaluation
by: Francesco Guido Mangano, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method
by: Zsolt Nagy, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study
by: Francesco Guido Mangano, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)