Mitral valve replacement or repair: choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

<p>Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and hemodynamic efficacy of different surgical approaches to correct outflow tract obstruction and mitral insufficiency in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.<br />Methods. Over a period from November 2010 to August 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Богачев-Прокофьев А. В., С. И. Железнев, М. С. Фоменко, А. В. Афанасьев, Р. М. Шарифулин, В. М. Назаров, О. Ю. Малахова, А. М. Караськов
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Meshalkin National Medical Research Center 2016-01-01
Series:Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/262
_version_ 1797715983231614976
author Богачев-Прокофьев А. В.
С. И. Железнев
М. С. Фоменко
А. В. Афанасьев
Р. М. Шарифулин
В. М. Назаров
О. Ю. Малахова
А. М. Караськов
author_facet Богачев-Прокофьев А. В.
С. И. Железнев
М. С. Фоменко
А. В. Афанасьев
Р. М. Шарифулин
В. М. Назаров
О. Ю. Малахова
А. М. Караськов
author_sort Богачев-Прокофьев А. В.
collection DOAJ
description <p>Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and hemodynamic efficacy of different surgical approaches to correct outflow tract obstruction and mitral insufficiency in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.<br />Methods. Over a period from November 2010 to August 2013, 146 patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) underwent surgical treatment. 88 patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized in two groups: Group I – extended myomectomy and MV replacement; Group II – extended myomectomy and MV repair. Mean age in Group I and Group II was 51.4±14.4 and 47.9±14.1 years respectively (p = 0.262). Mean peak gradient in Group I and Group II was 89.9±27.2 mm Hg. and 96.6±28.1 mm Hg. (p = 0.168). Pronounced MR was observed in 24 (58.5%) and 23 (56.1%) cases, moderate one in 17 (41.5%) and 18 (43.9%) cases in Group I and Group II respectively (p = 0.823). All patients demonstrated SAM syndrome. <br />Results. There was one (2.4%) early death in Group I (p = 0.314). In both groups such complications as AV block, ventricular septal defect and rupture of the left ventricle (p = 1.0) didn’t differ significantly. Average follow-up was 23.2 months for Group 1 and 25.8 months for Group 2. The survival rate in group I and group II was 78.9% and 96.6% respectively (Log-rank test = 0.034). Freedom from thromboembolic events was 83.2% and 100% respectively (Log-rank test = 0.026).<br />Conclusion. MV replacement and MV repair during extended septal myomectomy in patients with HOCM can be an effective method to eliminate MR and outflow tract obstruction. MV repair in patients with HOCM reduces thromboembolic events and provides better mid-term survival.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-12T08:14:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-67d0681db0b844e7b03fd9e1746a30fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1681-3472
2500-3119
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T08:14:52Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Meshalkin National Medical Research Center
record_format Article
series Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия
spelling doaj.art-67d0681db0b844e7b03fd9e1746a30fc2023-09-02T18:58:58ZengMeshalkin National Medical Research CenterПатология кровообращения и кардиохирургия1681-34722500-31192016-01-01194263310.21688/1681-3472-2015-4-26-33973Mitral valve replacement or repair: choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyБогачев-Прокофьев А. В.0С. И. Железнев1М. С. Фоменко2А. В. Афанасьев3Р. М. Шарифулин4В. М. Назаров5О. Ю. Малахова6А. М. Караськов7Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 630055, Новосибирск, ул. Речкуновская, 15Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 630055, Новосибирск, ул. Речкуновская, 15Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 630055, Новосибирск, ул. Речкуновская, 15Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 630055, Новосибирск, ул. Речкуновская, 15Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 630055, Новосибирск, ул. Речкуновская, 15Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 630055, Новосибирск, ул. Речкуновская, 15Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 630055, Новосибирск, ул. Речкуновская, 15Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт имени академика Е.Н. Мешалкина Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 630055, Новосибирск, ул. Речкуновская, 15<p>Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and hemodynamic efficacy of different surgical approaches to correct outflow tract obstruction and mitral insufficiency in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.<br />Methods. Over a period from November 2010 to August 2013, 146 patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) underwent surgical treatment. 88 patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized in two groups: Group I – extended myomectomy and MV replacement; Group II – extended myomectomy and MV repair. Mean age in Group I and Group II was 51.4±14.4 and 47.9±14.1 years respectively (p = 0.262). Mean peak gradient in Group I and Group II was 89.9±27.2 mm Hg. and 96.6±28.1 mm Hg. (p = 0.168). Pronounced MR was observed in 24 (58.5%) and 23 (56.1%) cases, moderate one in 17 (41.5%) and 18 (43.9%) cases in Group I and Group II respectively (p = 0.823). All patients demonstrated SAM syndrome. <br />Results. There was one (2.4%) early death in Group I (p = 0.314). In both groups such complications as AV block, ventricular septal defect and rupture of the left ventricle (p = 1.0) didn’t differ significantly. Average follow-up was 23.2 months for Group 1 and 25.8 months for Group 2. The survival rate in group I and group II was 78.9% and 96.6% respectively (Log-rank test = 0.034). Freedom from thromboembolic events was 83.2% and 100% respectively (Log-rank test = 0.026).<br />Conclusion. MV replacement and MV repair during extended septal myomectomy in patients with HOCM can be an effective method to eliminate MR and outflow tract obstruction. MV repair in patients with HOCM reduces thromboembolic events and provides better mid-term survival.</p>http://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/262Гипертрофическая кардиомиопатияМиоэктомияСердечная недостаточностьМитральная регургитация
spellingShingle Богачев-Прокофьев А. В.
С. И. Железнев
М. С. Фоменко
А. В. Афанасьев
Р. М. Шарифулин
В. М. Назаров
О. Ю. Малахова
А. М. Караськов
Mitral valve replacement or repair: choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия
Гипертрофическая кардиомиопатия
Миоэктомия
Сердечная недостаточность
Митральная регургитация
title Mitral valve replacement or repair: choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
title_full Mitral valve replacement or repair: choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
title_fullStr Mitral valve replacement or repair: choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
title_full_unstemmed Mitral valve replacement or repair: choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
title_short Mitral valve replacement or repair: choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
title_sort mitral valve replacement or repair choosing optimal surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
topic Гипертрофическая кардиомиопатия
Миоэктомия
Сердечная недостаточность
Митральная регургитация
url http://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/262
work_keys_str_mv AT bogačevprokofʹevav mitralvalvereplacementorrepairchoosingoptimalsurgicaltreatmentofhypertrophicobstructivecardiomyopathy
AT siželeznev mitralvalvereplacementorrepairchoosingoptimalsurgicaltreatmentofhypertrophicobstructivecardiomyopathy
AT msfomenko mitralvalvereplacementorrepairchoosingoptimalsurgicaltreatmentofhypertrophicobstructivecardiomyopathy
AT avafanasʹev mitralvalvereplacementorrepairchoosingoptimalsurgicaltreatmentofhypertrophicobstructivecardiomyopathy
AT rmšarifulin mitralvalvereplacementorrepairchoosingoptimalsurgicaltreatmentofhypertrophicobstructivecardiomyopathy
AT vmnazarov mitralvalvereplacementorrepairchoosingoptimalsurgicaltreatmentofhypertrophicobstructivecardiomyopathy
AT oûmalahova mitralvalvereplacementorrepairchoosingoptimalsurgicaltreatmentofhypertrophicobstructivecardiomyopathy
AT amkarasʹkov mitralvalvereplacementorrepairchoosingoptimalsurgicaltreatmentofhypertrophicobstructivecardiomyopathy