Comparative Study the Physical Properties of Flow, Solubility and Disintegration of Some Root Canal Sealers

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate comparatively the physical properties of solubility, disintegration and flow of some root canal sealers: SEALAPEX™, PULP CANAL SEALER™, TUBLISEAL™, AH PLUS™, AH 26™, TOP SEAL™, SEALER PLUS™, SEALER 26™ and ENDOFILL™. Method: Methodology used was accor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mirian Fátima Zacarro SCELZA, Pantaleo SCELZA, Roberto Fernandes COSTA, Alexandre CÂMARA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB) 2006-09-01
Series:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo4v63.pdf
_version_ 1818333414499024896
author Mirian Fátima Zacarro SCELZA
Pantaleo SCELZA
Roberto Fernandes COSTA
Alexandre CÂMARA
author_facet Mirian Fátima Zacarro SCELZA
Pantaleo SCELZA
Roberto Fernandes COSTA
Alexandre CÂMARA
author_sort Mirian Fátima Zacarro SCELZA
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate comparatively the physical properties of solubility, disintegration and flow of some root canal sealers: SEALAPEX™, PULP CANAL SEALER™, TUBLISEAL™, AH PLUS™, AH 26™, TOP SEAL™, SEALER PLUS™, SEALER 26™ and ENDOFILL™. Method: Methodology used was according ISO 6786 which test the physicochemical properties using five proof specimens for each test. Results: In terms of solubility, the root canal sealers analyzed have been classified in the following decreasing order: ENDOFILL™, SEALAPEX™, PULP CANAL SEALER™, AH 26™, TUBLISEAL™, SEALER PLUS™, AH PLUS™, TOP SEAL™ and SEALER 26™, where a statistically significant difference was found at a 1% level. Between TOP SEAL™ and SEALER™ 26 root canal sealers there was no statistically significant difference. None of the sealers above have shown disintegration. Regarding flow, the root canal sealers in the study have been classified in the following decreasing order: TUBLISEAL™ root canal sealer, followed by ENDOFILL™, SEALAPEX™, PULP CANAL SEALER™, AH PLUS™, TOP SEAL™, AH 26™, SEALER 26™ and SEALER PLUS™, where a statistically significant difference was found at a 1% level. Conclusion: The solubility, only the SEALAPEX™ and ENDOFILL™ have shown a limit above determined by ISO 6786.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T13:51:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-67df24fe87cf47259bd51f679ef5eecc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1519-0501
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T13:51:16Z
publishDate 2006-09-01
publisher Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)
record_format Article
series Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
spelling doaj.art-67df24fe87cf47259bd51f679ef5eecc2022-12-21T23:43:10ZengAssociation of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada1519-05012006-09-0163243247Comparative Study the Physical Properties of Flow, Solubility and Disintegration of Some Root Canal SealersMirian Fátima Zacarro SCELZAPantaleo SCELZARoberto Fernandes COSTAAlexandre CÂMARAObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate comparatively the physical properties of solubility, disintegration and flow of some root canal sealers: SEALAPEX™, PULP CANAL SEALER™, TUBLISEAL™, AH PLUS™, AH 26™, TOP SEAL™, SEALER PLUS™, SEALER 26™ and ENDOFILL™. Method: Methodology used was according ISO 6786 which test the physicochemical properties using five proof specimens for each test. Results: In terms of solubility, the root canal sealers analyzed have been classified in the following decreasing order: ENDOFILL™, SEALAPEX™, PULP CANAL SEALER™, AH 26™, TUBLISEAL™, SEALER PLUS™, AH PLUS™, TOP SEAL™ and SEALER 26™, where a statistically significant difference was found at a 1% level. Between TOP SEAL™ and SEALER™ 26 root canal sealers there was no statistically significant difference. None of the sealers above have shown disintegration. Regarding flow, the root canal sealers in the study have been classified in the following decreasing order: TUBLISEAL™ root canal sealer, followed by ENDOFILL™, SEALAPEX™, PULP CANAL SEALER™, AH PLUS™, TOP SEAL™, AH 26™, SEALER 26™ and SEALER PLUS™, where a statistically significant difference was found at a 1% level. Conclusion: The solubility, only the SEALAPEX™ and ENDOFILL™ have shown a limit above determined by ISO 6786.http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo4v63.pdfFlowSolubilityDisintegration
spellingShingle Mirian Fátima Zacarro SCELZA
Pantaleo SCELZA
Roberto Fernandes COSTA
Alexandre CÂMARA
Comparative Study the Physical Properties of Flow, Solubility and Disintegration of Some Root Canal Sealers
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
Flow
Solubility
Disintegration
title Comparative Study the Physical Properties of Flow, Solubility and Disintegration of Some Root Canal Sealers
title_full Comparative Study the Physical Properties of Flow, Solubility and Disintegration of Some Root Canal Sealers
title_fullStr Comparative Study the Physical Properties of Flow, Solubility and Disintegration of Some Root Canal Sealers
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study the Physical Properties of Flow, Solubility and Disintegration of Some Root Canal Sealers
title_short Comparative Study the Physical Properties of Flow, Solubility and Disintegration of Some Root Canal Sealers
title_sort comparative study the physical properties of flow solubility and disintegration of some root canal sealers
topic Flow
Solubility
Disintegration
url http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo4v63.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mirianfatimazacarroscelza comparativestudythephysicalpropertiesofflowsolubilityanddisintegrationofsomerootcanalsealers
AT pantaleoscelza comparativestudythephysicalpropertiesofflowsolubilityanddisintegrationofsomerootcanalsealers
AT robertofernandescosta comparativestudythephysicalpropertiesofflowsolubilityanddisintegrationofsomerootcanalsealers
AT alexandrecamara comparativestudythephysicalpropertiesofflowsolubilityanddisintegrationofsomerootcanalsealers