A Systematic Review to Inform the Development of a Reporting Guideline for Concept Mapping Research

Concept mapping is a phased, mixed-method approach that is increasingly used in health research to develop an understanding of complex phenomena. The six phases of concept mapping are preparation, idea generation, structuring (clustering and prioritization), data analysis, interpretation, and utiliz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandesh Pantha, Martin Jones, Pragya Gartoulla, Richard Gray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Methods and Protocols
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/6/5/101
_version_ 1797572716373475328
author Sandesh Pantha
Martin Jones
Pragya Gartoulla
Richard Gray
author_facet Sandesh Pantha
Martin Jones
Pragya Gartoulla
Richard Gray
author_sort Sandesh Pantha
collection DOAJ
description Concept mapping is a phased, mixed-method approach that is increasingly used in health research to develop an understanding of complex phenomena. The six phases of concept mapping are preparation, idea generation, structuring (clustering and prioritization), data analysis, interpretation, and utilization of the map. The reporting of concept mapping research requires the development of a specific reporting guideline. We conducted a systematic review to identify candidate reporting items for inclusion in a reporting guideline. Three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo) were searched to identify studies that used concept mapping methodology. We included 75 concept mapping studies published since 2019 from which we extracted information about the quality of reporting. A third of the studies focused on public health. We identified 71 candidate items that relate to the quality of reporting concept mapping research. The rationale for the study, the focus prompt, procedures for brainstorming, and structuring statements were consistently reported across the included studies. The process for developing the focus prompt, the rationale for the size of the stakeholder groups, and the process for determining the final concept map were generally not reported. The findings from the review will be used to inform the development of our reporting guideline for concept mapping research.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:00:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-67e928ed17cb43de96dc54d02d06011c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2409-9279
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:00:39Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Methods and Protocols
spelling doaj.art-67e928ed17cb43de96dc54d02d06011c2023-11-19T17:35:11ZengMDPI AGMethods and Protocols2409-92792023-10-016510110.3390/mps6050101A Systematic Review to Inform the Development of a Reporting Guideline for Concept Mapping ResearchSandesh Pantha0Martin Jones1Pragya Gartoulla2Richard Gray3School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, AustraliaDepartment of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla Campus, Whyalla Norrie, SA 5608, AustraliaAustralian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, AustraliaConcept mapping is a phased, mixed-method approach that is increasingly used in health research to develop an understanding of complex phenomena. The six phases of concept mapping are preparation, idea generation, structuring (clustering and prioritization), data analysis, interpretation, and utilization of the map. The reporting of concept mapping research requires the development of a specific reporting guideline. We conducted a systematic review to identify candidate reporting items for inclusion in a reporting guideline. Three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo) were searched to identify studies that used concept mapping methodology. We included 75 concept mapping studies published since 2019 from which we extracted information about the quality of reporting. A third of the studies focused on public health. We identified 71 candidate items that relate to the quality of reporting concept mapping research. The rationale for the study, the focus prompt, procedures for brainstorming, and structuring statements were consistently reported across the included studies. The process for developing the focus prompt, the rationale for the size of the stakeholder groups, and the process for determining the final concept map were generally not reported. The findings from the review will be used to inform the development of our reporting guideline for concept mapping research.https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/6/5/101concept mappingqualityreporting guidelinessystematic review
spellingShingle Sandesh Pantha
Martin Jones
Pragya Gartoulla
Richard Gray
A Systematic Review to Inform the Development of a Reporting Guideline for Concept Mapping Research
Methods and Protocols
concept mapping
quality
reporting guidelines
systematic review
title A Systematic Review to Inform the Development of a Reporting Guideline for Concept Mapping Research
title_full A Systematic Review to Inform the Development of a Reporting Guideline for Concept Mapping Research
title_fullStr A Systematic Review to Inform the Development of a Reporting Guideline for Concept Mapping Research
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review to Inform the Development of a Reporting Guideline for Concept Mapping Research
title_short A Systematic Review to Inform the Development of a Reporting Guideline for Concept Mapping Research
title_sort systematic review to inform the development of a reporting guideline for concept mapping research
topic concept mapping
quality
reporting guidelines
systematic review
url https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/6/5/101
work_keys_str_mv AT sandeshpantha asystematicreviewtoinformthedevelopmentofareportingguidelineforconceptmappingresearch
AT martinjones asystematicreviewtoinformthedevelopmentofareportingguidelineforconceptmappingresearch
AT pragyagartoulla asystematicreviewtoinformthedevelopmentofareportingguidelineforconceptmappingresearch
AT richardgray asystematicreviewtoinformthedevelopmentofareportingguidelineforconceptmappingresearch
AT sandeshpantha systematicreviewtoinformthedevelopmentofareportingguidelineforconceptmappingresearch
AT martinjones systematicreviewtoinformthedevelopmentofareportingguidelineforconceptmappingresearch
AT pragyagartoulla systematicreviewtoinformthedevelopmentofareportingguidelineforconceptmappingresearch
AT richardgray systematicreviewtoinformthedevelopmentofareportingguidelineforconceptmappingresearch