Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>sepsis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>(MRSA) is the leading pathogenic cause of nosocomial infections, especially in bacteraemia and sepsis. The essential therapy for MRSA infection is glycopeptides. Therap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirmaci Beyhan, Canoz Ozlem, Gozukucuk Suveyda, Alp Emine, Doganay Mehmet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2004-10-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/4/43
_version_ 1811267253716385792
author Kirmaci Beyhan
Canoz Ozlem
Gozukucuk Suveyda
Alp Emine
Doganay Mehmet
author_facet Kirmaci Beyhan
Canoz Ozlem
Gozukucuk Suveyda
Alp Emine
Doganay Mehmet
author_sort Kirmaci Beyhan
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>(MRSA) is the leading pathogenic cause of nosocomial infections, especially in bacteraemia and sepsis. The essential therapy for MRSA infection is glycopeptides. Therapeutic failure can be seen with this therapy and the mortality is still high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional effect of G-CSF on the traditional antibiotic treatment in an experimental MRSA sepsis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Experimental sepsis was performed in mice by intraperitoneal injection of MRSA isolate. Inoculum dose was estimated as 6 × 10<sup>9</sup>/ml. Mice were randomised for the study into four group; control group (not receive any therapy), G-CSF group (1000 ng/daily, subcutaneously for 3 d), antibiotic group (vancomycin 25 or 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally every 12 hours for 7 d), and vancomycin+G-CSF group (at the same concentrations and duration). Autopsy was done within one hour after mice died. If mice was still alive at the end of seventh day, they were sacrificed, and autopsy was done. In all groups, the effect of G-CSF therapy on the survival, the number of the MRSA colonies in the lung, liver, heart, spleen, and peritoneal cultures, the histopathology of the lung, liver, heart and spleen was investigated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>One hundred and six mice were used. There were no significant differences in survival rates and bacterial eradication in G-CSF group compared with control group, and also in antibiotic +G-CSF group compared with antibiotic alone group. These parameters were all significantly different in antibiotic alone group compared with control group. Histopathologically, inflammation of the lung and liver were significantly reduced in vancomycin (25 mg/kg)+G-CSF and vancomycin (50 mg/kg)+G-CSF subgroups, respectively (p < 0.01). The histopathological inflammation of the other organs was not significantly different in antibiotic+G-CSF group compared with antibiotic group and, also G-CSF group compared with control group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>G-CSF treatment had no additional effect on survival and bacterial eradication in MRSA sepsis in nonneutropenic mice; and only a little effect on histopathology. G-CSF treatment is very expensive, likewise glycopeptides. The more interest in infection control measures, and prevent the spread of MRSA infections is more rational.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:59:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-67ed1e874ae3410cad20a251bf216404
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:59:06Z
publishDate 2004-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-67ed1e874ae3410cad20a251bf2164042022-12-22T03:16:54ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342004-10-01414310.1186/1471-2334-4-43Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>sepsisKirmaci BeyhanCanoz OzlemGozukucuk SuveydaAlp EmineDoganay Mehmet<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>(MRSA) is the leading pathogenic cause of nosocomial infections, especially in bacteraemia and sepsis. The essential therapy for MRSA infection is glycopeptides. Therapeutic failure can be seen with this therapy and the mortality is still high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional effect of G-CSF on the traditional antibiotic treatment in an experimental MRSA sepsis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Experimental sepsis was performed in mice by intraperitoneal injection of MRSA isolate. Inoculum dose was estimated as 6 × 10<sup>9</sup>/ml. Mice were randomised for the study into four group; control group (not receive any therapy), G-CSF group (1000 ng/daily, subcutaneously for 3 d), antibiotic group (vancomycin 25 or 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally every 12 hours for 7 d), and vancomycin+G-CSF group (at the same concentrations and duration). Autopsy was done within one hour after mice died. If mice was still alive at the end of seventh day, they were sacrificed, and autopsy was done. In all groups, the effect of G-CSF therapy on the survival, the number of the MRSA colonies in the lung, liver, heart, spleen, and peritoneal cultures, the histopathology of the lung, liver, heart and spleen was investigated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>One hundred and six mice were used. There were no significant differences in survival rates and bacterial eradication in G-CSF group compared with control group, and also in antibiotic +G-CSF group compared with antibiotic alone group. These parameters were all significantly different in antibiotic alone group compared with control group. Histopathologically, inflammation of the lung and liver were significantly reduced in vancomycin (25 mg/kg)+G-CSF and vancomycin (50 mg/kg)+G-CSF subgroups, respectively (p < 0.01). The histopathological inflammation of the other organs was not significantly different in antibiotic+G-CSF group compared with antibiotic group and, also G-CSF group compared with control group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>G-CSF treatment had no additional effect on survival and bacterial eradication in MRSA sepsis in nonneutropenic mice; and only a little effect on histopathology. G-CSF treatment is very expensive, likewise glycopeptides. The more interest in infection control measures, and prevent the spread of MRSA infections is more rational.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/4/43
spellingShingle Kirmaci Beyhan
Canoz Ozlem
Gozukucuk Suveyda
Alp Emine
Doganay Mehmet
Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>sepsis
BMC Infectious Diseases
title Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>sepsis
title_full Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>sepsis
title_fullStr Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>sepsis
title_short Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant <it>Staphylococcus aureus </it>sepsis
title_sort effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant it staphylococcus aureus it sepsis
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/4/43
work_keys_str_mv AT kirmacibeyhan effectofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorinexperimentalmethicillinresistantitstaphylococcusaureusitsepsis
AT canozozlem effectofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorinexperimentalmethicillinresistantitstaphylococcusaureusitsepsis
AT gozukucuksuveyda effectofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorinexperimentalmethicillinresistantitstaphylococcusaureusitsepsis
AT alpemine effectofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorinexperimentalmethicillinresistantitstaphylococcusaureusitsepsis
AT doganaymehmet effectofgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorinexperimentalmethicillinresistantitstaphylococcusaureusitsepsis