Lessons learned in practice-based research: Studying language interventions for young children in the real world

Background and aims Practice-based research holds potential as a promising solution to closing the research-practice gap, because it addresses research questions based on problems that arise in clinical practice and tests whether systems and interventions are effective and sustainable in a clinical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachael E Smyth, Julie Theurer, Lisa MD Archibald, Janis Oram Cardy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-04-01
Series:Autism and Developmental Language Impairments
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941520913482
_version_ 1797334411281170432
author Rachael E Smyth
Julie Theurer
Lisa MD Archibald
Janis Oram Cardy
author_facet Rachael E Smyth
Julie Theurer
Lisa MD Archibald
Janis Oram Cardy
author_sort Rachael E Smyth
collection DOAJ
description Background and aims Practice-based research holds potential as a promising solution to closing the research-practice gap, because it addresses research questions based on problems that arise in clinical practice and tests whether systems and interventions are effective and sustainable in a clinical setting. One type of practice-based research involves capturing practice by collecting evidence within clinical settings to evaluate the effectiveness of current practices. Here, we describe our collaboration between researchers and clinicians that sought to answer clinician-driven questions about community-based language interventions for young children (Are our interventions effective? What predicts response to our interventions?) and to address questions about the characteristics, strengths, and challenges of engaging in practice-based research. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of 59 young children who had participated in three group language interventions at one publicly funded community clinic between 2012 and 2017. Change on the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS), a government mandated communicative participation measure, was extracted as the main outcome measure. Potential predictors of growth during intervention were also extracted from the charts, including type of intervention received, attendance, age at the start of intervention, functional communication ability pre-intervention, and time between pre- and post-intervention FOCUS scores. Results Overall, 49% of children demonstrated meaningful clinical change on the FOCUS after their participation in the language groups. Only 3% of participants showed possibly meaningful clinical change, while the remaining 46% of participants demonstrated not likely meaningful clinical change. There were no significant predictors of communicative participation growth during intervention. Conclusions Using a practice-based research approach aimed at capturing current practice, we were able to answer questions about the effectiveness of interventions delivered in real-world settings and learn about factors that do not appear to influence growth during these interventions. We also learned about benefits associated with engaging in practice-based research, including high clinical motivation, high external validity, and minimal time/cost investment. Challenges identified were helpful in informing our future efforts to examine other possible predictors through development of a new, clinically feasible checklist, and to pursue methods for improving collection of outcome data in the clinical setting. Implications: Clinicians and researchers can successfully collaborate to answer clinically informed research questions while considering realistic clinical practice and using research-informed methods and principles. Practice-based research partnerships between researchers and clinicians are both valuable and feasible.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:20:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-67ee09cff78c486b86a6dd28f2e988e3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2396-9415
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:20:21Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Autism and Developmental Language Impairments
spelling doaj.art-67ee09cff78c486b86a6dd28f2e988e32024-02-02T06:00:33ZengSAGE PublishingAutism and Developmental Language Impairments2396-94152020-04-01510.1177/2396941520913482Lessons learned in practice-based research: Studying language interventions for young children in the real worldRachael E SmythJulie TheurerLisa MD ArchibaldJanis Oram CardyBackground and aims Practice-based research holds potential as a promising solution to closing the research-practice gap, because it addresses research questions based on problems that arise in clinical practice and tests whether systems and interventions are effective and sustainable in a clinical setting. One type of practice-based research involves capturing practice by collecting evidence within clinical settings to evaluate the effectiveness of current practices. Here, we describe our collaboration between researchers and clinicians that sought to answer clinician-driven questions about community-based language interventions for young children (Are our interventions effective? What predicts response to our interventions?) and to address questions about the characteristics, strengths, and challenges of engaging in practice-based research. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of 59 young children who had participated in three group language interventions at one publicly funded community clinic between 2012 and 2017. Change on the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS), a government mandated communicative participation measure, was extracted as the main outcome measure. Potential predictors of growth during intervention were also extracted from the charts, including type of intervention received, attendance, age at the start of intervention, functional communication ability pre-intervention, and time between pre- and post-intervention FOCUS scores. Results Overall, 49% of children demonstrated meaningful clinical change on the FOCUS after their participation in the language groups. Only 3% of participants showed possibly meaningful clinical change, while the remaining 46% of participants demonstrated not likely meaningful clinical change. There were no significant predictors of communicative participation growth during intervention. Conclusions Using a practice-based research approach aimed at capturing current practice, we were able to answer questions about the effectiveness of interventions delivered in real-world settings and learn about factors that do not appear to influence growth during these interventions. We also learned about benefits associated with engaging in practice-based research, including high clinical motivation, high external validity, and minimal time/cost investment. Challenges identified were helpful in informing our future efforts to examine other possible predictors through development of a new, clinically feasible checklist, and to pursue methods for improving collection of outcome data in the clinical setting. Implications: Clinicians and researchers can successfully collaborate to answer clinically informed research questions while considering realistic clinical practice and using research-informed methods and principles. Practice-based research partnerships between researchers and clinicians are both valuable and feasible.https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941520913482
spellingShingle Rachael E Smyth
Julie Theurer
Lisa MD Archibald
Janis Oram Cardy
Lessons learned in practice-based research: Studying language interventions for young children in the real world
Autism and Developmental Language Impairments
title Lessons learned in practice-based research: Studying language interventions for young children in the real world
title_full Lessons learned in practice-based research: Studying language interventions for young children in the real world
title_fullStr Lessons learned in practice-based research: Studying language interventions for young children in the real world
title_full_unstemmed Lessons learned in practice-based research: Studying language interventions for young children in the real world
title_short Lessons learned in practice-based research: Studying language interventions for young children in the real world
title_sort lessons learned in practice based research studying language interventions for young children in the real world
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941520913482
work_keys_str_mv AT rachaelesmyth lessonslearnedinpracticebasedresearchstudyinglanguageinterventionsforyoungchildrenintherealworld
AT julietheurer lessonslearnedinpracticebasedresearchstudyinglanguageinterventionsforyoungchildrenintherealworld
AT lisamdarchibald lessonslearnedinpracticebasedresearchstudyinglanguageinterventionsforyoungchildrenintherealworld
AT janisoramcardy lessonslearnedinpracticebasedresearchstudyinglanguageinterventionsforyoungchildrenintherealworld