Smallpox good and bad: evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the Urals in the 19th — early 20th century

In this paper, elaboration of the image of smallpox in popular perception, which manifested itself in connection with the organization of smallpox vaccination by the Russian government, is examined. In the context of the cultural dominance of the ruling class over the people and paternalistic attitu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Golikova S.V.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RA 2022-09-01
Series:Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ipdn.ru/_private/a58/148-156.pdf
_version_ 1811211178133684224
author Golikova S.V.
author_facet Golikova S.V.
author_sort Golikova S.V.
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, elaboration of the image of smallpox in popular perception, which manifested itself in connection with the organization of smallpox vaccination by the Russian government, is examined. In the context of the cultural dominance of the ruling class over the people and paternalistic attitude towards it, promulgation of the vaccination is a unique phenomenon for the early 19th century Russia, when the “amount at stake” forced the authorities to appeal to their subjects. It provides an opportunity to analyze the symbols generated by the dominant ideology and their perception by traditional consciousness. Propaganda started by means of sermons by the clergy. Numerous Exhortations emphasized contraposition of the benefits of the vaccinated smallpox and the harm of the natural smallpox. The verbal channel of the agitation was supported by a visual one — publication of ”popular prints”. Analysis of the plots in nine images from D.A. Rovinsky’s collection showed that corporeality was recognized as the main means of the visual agitation. Through the image of human body, health and beauty of persons vaccinated against smallpox was transmitted, as well as deformity and hideousness of those who went through the natural smallpox. Having absorbed the dualism of the pro-government propaganda, popular consciousness went to create an alternative version of perceptions of the infection and vaccination. By applying the binary oppositions ’friend-foe’ and ’sacred-profane’, people made an important change in their own system of values: unlike other epidemics, such a particularly dangerous infection as smallpox had changed its place in the traditional worldview. It stopped being associated with plague and death and became recognized as being “one’s own” and ”godsent”. Therefore, it should not be opposed but should be accepted with gratitude as a ”gift of God”. Intercultural communications on the subject of smallpox vaccination are not only a vivid illustration of the ambiguous impact of the dominant ideology on a folk culture; the emergence of socially and culturally differentiated images of smallpox, having drawn a new demarcation line between the scholarly and folk cultures, deepened the rift in the Russian society, as well as introduced additional difficulties in the process of immunoprophylaxis and made it difficult to identify and treat the smallpox patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:08:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-67fc4b6d466145e894badac78534e61d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1811-7465
2071-0437
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:08:24Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RA
record_format Article
series Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии
spelling doaj.art-67fc4b6d466145e894badac78534e61d2022-12-22T03:46:50ZrusTyumen Scientific Centre SB RAВестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии1811-74652071-04372022-09-013(58)14815610.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-13Smallpox good and bad: evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the Urals in the 19th — early 20th centuryGolikova S.V. 0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-4763Institute of History and Archaeology of Ural Branch RASIn this paper, elaboration of the image of smallpox in popular perception, which manifested itself in connection with the organization of smallpox vaccination by the Russian government, is examined. In the context of the cultural dominance of the ruling class over the people and paternalistic attitude towards it, promulgation of the vaccination is a unique phenomenon for the early 19th century Russia, when the “amount at stake” forced the authorities to appeal to their subjects. It provides an opportunity to analyze the symbols generated by the dominant ideology and their perception by traditional consciousness. Propaganda started by means of sermons by the clergy. Numerous Exhortations emphasized contraposition of the benefits of the vaccinated smallpox and the harm of the natural smallpox. The verbal channel of the agitation was supported by a visual one — publication of ”popular prints”. Analysis of the plots in nine images from D.A. Rovinsky’s collection showed that corporeality was recognized as the main means of the visual agitation. Through the image of human body, health and beauty of persons vaccinated against smallpox was transmitted, as well as deformity and hideousness of those who went through the natural smallpox. Having absorbed the dualism of the pro-government propaganda, popular consciousness went to create an alternative version of perceptions of the infection and vaccination. By applying the binary oppositions ’friend-foe’ and ’sacred-profane’, people made an important change in their own system of values: unlike other epidemics, such a particularly dangerous infection as smallpox had changed its place in the traditional worldview. It stopped being associated with plague and death and became recognized as being “one’s own” and ”godsent”. Therefore, it should not be opposed but should be accepted with gratitude as a ”gift of God”. Intercultural communications on the subject of smallpox vaccination are not only a vivid illustration of the ambiguous impact of the dominant ideology on a folk culture; the emergence of socially and culturally differentiated images of smallpox, having drawn a new demarcation line between the scholarly and folk cultures, deepened the rift in the Russian society, as well as introduced additional difficulties in the process of immunoprophylaxis and made it difficult to identify and treat the smallpox patients.http://www.ipdn.ru/_private/a58/148-156.pdfpersonification of diseasehistory of immunoprophylaxissmallpox vaccination“popular prints”opposition “our-alien”
spellingShingle Golikova S.V.
Smallpox good and bad: evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the Urals in the 19th — early 20th century
Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии
personification of disease
history of immunoprophylaxis
smallpox vaccination
“popular prints”
opposition “our-alien”
title Smallpox good and bad: evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the Urals in the 19th — early 20th century
title_full Smallpox good and bad: evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the Urals in the 19th — early 20th century
title_fullStr Smallpox good and bad: evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the Urals in the 19th — early 20th century
title_full_unstemmed Smallpox good and bad: evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the Urals in the 19th — early 20th century
title_short Smallpox good and bad: evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the Urals in the 19th — early 20th century
title_sort smallpox good and bad evolution of popular perceptions of the personification of the disease in the urals in the 19th early 20th century
topic personification of disease
history of immunoprophylaxis
smallpox vaccination
“popular prints”
opposition “our-alien”
url http://www.ipdn.ru/_private/a58/148-156.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT golikovasv smallpoxgoodandbadevolutionofpopularperceptionsofthepersonificationofthediseaseintheuralsinthe19thearly20thcentury