Embryonic Afterlives?

While much has been written on the moral and metaphysical status of fetuses in Christian bioethics, little thought has been given to how we might characterize the afterlives of the unborn, especially of those human biological individuals who die before even developing a body that could theoreticall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amber Griffioen
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Catholic University of Louvain 2023-05-01
Series:TheoLogica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/65873
_version_ 1797829836046073856
author Amber Griffioen
author_facet Amber Griffioen
author_sort Amber Griffioen
collection DOAJ
description While much has been written on the moral and metaphysical status of fetuses in Christian bioethics, little thought has been given to how we might characterize the afterlives of the unborn, especially of those human biological individuals who die before even developing a body that could theoretically be resurrected. In this paper, I therefore undertake an examination of questions surrounding the afterlife, specifically as it relates to early pregnancy loss. I first lay out what I call the “problem of weird heavens” that arises when we consider that significantly more unborn human beings have died than have been born in the history of humankind. I then go on to consider questions surrounding both the soteriological status of the embryo and the status of any resurrected “body” it might have. I conclude with the germs of an alternative approach mirrored on the idea of embryonic resorption and mystical union.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T13:27:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-68047694c4ed44b39812318b7bbfdf8e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2593-0265
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-09T13:27:25Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Catholic University of Louvain
record_format Article
series TheoLogica
spelling doaj.art-68047694c4ed44b39812318b7bbfdf8e2023-05-10T07:27:54ZdeuCatholic University of LouvainTheoLogica2593-02652023-05-018110.14428/thl.v8i1.65873Embryonic Afterlives? Amber Griffioen While much has been written on the moral and metaphysical status of fetuses in Christian bioethics, little thought has been given to how we might characterize the afterlives of the unborn, especially of those human biological individuals who die before even developing a body that could theoretically be resurrected. In this paper, I therefore undertake an examination of questions surrounding the afterlife, specifically as it relates to early pregnancy loss. I first lay out what I call the “problem of weird heavens” that arises when we consider that significantly more unborn human beings have died than have been born in the history of humankind. I then go on to consider questions surrounding both the soteriological status of the embryo and the status of any resurrected “body” it might have. I conclude with the germs of an alternative approach mirrored on the idea of embryonic resorption and mystical union. https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/65873Miscarriage, Pregnancy loss, Pregnancy, Afterlife, Infant baptism, Augustine
spellingShingle Amber Griffioen
Embryonic Afterlives?
TheoLogica
Miscarriage, Pregnancy loss, Pregnancy, Afterlife, Infant baptism, Augustine
title Embryonic Afterlives?
title_full Embryonic Afterlives?
title_fullStr Embryonic Afterlives?
title_full_unstemmed Embryonic Afterlives?
title_short Embryonic Afterlives?
title_sort embryonic afterlives
topic Miscarriage, Pregnancy loss, Pregnancy, Afterlife, Infant baptism, Augustine
url https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/65873
work_keys_str_mv AT ambergriffioen embryonicafterlives