Internet testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it> in England, 2006 to 2010

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years there has been interest in websites as a means of increasing access to free chlamydia tests through the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) in England. We aimed to describe and evaluate online access to chla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Woodhall Sarah C, Sile Bersabeh, Talebi Alireza, Nardone Anthony, Baraitser Paula
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-12-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1095
_version_ 1818449560446435328
author Woodhall Sarah C
Sile Bersabeh
Talebi Alireza
Nardone Anthony
Baraitser Paula
author_facet Woodhall Sarah C
Sile Bersabeh
Talebi Alireza
Nardone Anthony
Baraitser Paula
author_sort Woodhall Sarah C
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years there has been interest in websites as a means of increasing access to free chlamydia tests through the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) in England. We aimed to describe and evaluate online access to chlamydia testing within the NCSP.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We analysed NCSP chlamydia testing data (2006–2010) for 15–24 year olds from the 71/95 programme areas in England where site codes were available to identify tests ordered through the internet. The characteristics of people using online testing services in 2010 were compared with those testing in general practice (GP) or community sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. We evaluated 58 websites offering free chlamydia tests through the NCSP, and 32 offering kits on a commercial basis for signposting to clinical service and health promotion advice offered.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Between 2006 and 2010, 5% of all tests in the included programme areas were accessed through the internet. The number of internet tests increased from 18 (<1% of all tests) in 2006 to 59,750 in 2010 (6% of all NCSP tests). In 2010 the proportion of NCSP tests accessed online by programme area ranged from <1% to 38%. The proportion of tests with a positive result on the internet was higher than tests from general practice and comparable to those from community SRH services (internet 7.6%; GP 5.6%; Community SRH 8.2%). A higher proportion of people accessing online testing were male, aged 20–24 and reported >1 sexual partner in the past year. Provision of sexual health information and appropriate signposting for those in need of clinical services varied between websites. Service provision within the NCSP was fragmented with multiple providers serving specific geographical catchment areas.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Internet testing reaches a population with a relatively high risk of chlamydia infection and appears acceptable to young men, a group that has been difficult to engage with chlamydia testing. In order to maximise the potential benefit of these services, websites should be consistent with national guidelines and adhere to minimum standards for signposting to clinical care and health promotion information. The current system with multiple providers servicing geographically specific catchment areas is contrary to the geographically unrestricted nature of the internet and potentially confusing for clients.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T20:37:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-681cba582aaa461f8b5de5c476f1154d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T20:37:21Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-681cba582aaa461f8b5de5c476f1154d2022-12-21T22:48:22ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582012-12-01121109510.1186/1471-2458-12-1095Internet testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it> in England, 2006 to 2010Woodhall Sarah CSile BersabehTalebi AlirezaNardone AnthonyBaraitser Paula<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In recent years there has been interest in websites as a means of increasing access to free chlamydia tests through the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) in England. We aimed to describe and evaluate online access to chlamydia testing within the NCSP.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We analysed NCSP chlamydia testing data (2006–2010) for 15–24 year olds from the 71/95 programme areas in England where site codes were available to identify tests ordered through the internet. The characteristics of people using online testing services in 2010 were compared with those testing in general practice (GP) or community sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. We evaluated 58 websites offering free chlamydia tests through the NCSP, and 32 offering kits on a commercial basis for signposting to clinical service and health promotion advice offered.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Between 2006 and 2010, 5% of all tests in the included programme areas were accessed through the internet. The number of internet tests increased from 18 (<1% of all tests) in 2006 to 59,750 in 2010 (6% of all NCSP tests). In 2010 the proportion of NCSP tests accessed online by programme area ranged from <1% to 38%. The proportion of tests with a positive result on the internet was higher than tests from general practice and comparable to those from community SRH services (internet 7.6%; GP 5.6%; Community SRH 8.2%). A higher proportion of people accessing online testing were male, aged 20–24 and reported >1 sexual partner in the past year. Provision of sexual health information and appropriate signposting for those in need of clinical services varied between websites. Service provision within the NCSP was fragmented with multiple providers serving specific geographical catchment areas.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Internet testing reaches a population with a relatively high risk of chlamydia infection and appears acceptable to young men, a group that has been difficult to engage with chlamydia testing. In order to maximise the potential benefit of these services, websites should be consistent with national guidelines and adhere to minimum standards for signposting to clinical care and health promotion information. The current system with multiple providers servicing geographically specific catchment areas is contrary to the geographically unrestricted nature of the internet and potentially confusing for clients.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1095Chlamydia trachomatisScreeningInternet
spellingShingle Woodhall Sarah C
Sile Bersabeh
Talebi Alireza
Nardone Anthony
Baraitser Paula
Internet testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it> in England, 2006 to 2010
BMC Public Health
Chlamydia trachomatis
Screening
Internet
title Internet testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it> in England, 2006 to 2010
title_full Internet testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it> in England, 2006 to 2010
title_fullStr Internet testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it> in England, 2006 to 2010
title_full_unstemmed Internet testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it> in England, 2006 to 2010
title_short Internet testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it> in England, 2006 to 2010
title_sort internet testing for it chlamydia trachomatis it in england 2006 to 2010
topic Chlamydia trachomatis
Screening
Internet
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1095
work_keys_str_mv AT woodhallsarahc internettestingforitchlamydiatrachomatisitinengland2006to2010
AT silebersabeh internettestingforitchlamydiatrachomatisitinengland2006to2010
AT talebialireza internettestingforitchlamydiatrachomatisitinengland2006to2010
AT nardoneanthony internettestingforitchlamydiatrachomatisitinengland2006to2010
AT baraitserpaula internettestingforitchlamydiatrachomatisitinengland2006to2010