The Response of Maize Lines to Foliar Fertilizing

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of two foliar fertilizers applied on five maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) lines. Fertilizers were applied at different growth stages of maize, during three consecutive years (2010–2012) at the experimental field of the Maize Research Inst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milan Brankov, Milena Simić, Željko Dolijanović, Miloš Rajković, Violeta Mandić, Vesna Dragičević
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/365
_version_ 1827708961638318080
author Milan Brankov
Milena Simić
Željko Dolijanović
Miloš Rajković
Violeta Mandić
Vesna Dragičević
author_facet Milan Brankov
Milena Simić
Željko Dolijanović
Miloš Rajković
Violeta Mandić
Vesna Dragičević
author_sort Milan Brankov
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of two foliar fertilizers applied on five maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) lines. Fertilizers were applied at different growth stages of maize, during three consecutive years (2010–2012) at the experimental field of the Maize Research Institute “Zemun Polje”, Serbia. Maize growth parameters such as fresh matter, height, leaf area and grain yield were recorded. Foliar fertilizer with amino acids (FAA) was more advantageous to maize plants compared to fertilizer containing phosphorus (FP) as a main component. Applied FAA has shown positive effects by increasing fresh matter, leaf area index, and plant height in all three years. In 2012, due to unfavorable meteorological conditions, grain yield and harvest index were very low, compared to the previous two years, although, positive effects on morphological traits were observed 21 days after treatments (DAT), as well as in the anthesis stage. The best results of 30% of grain yield and harvest index increase were recorded in line L1 in 2010 and 2011. The same line had an increase of more than 40% of fresh matter and leaf area on average for all three years. The positive effects that have been noticed in this research could recommend foliar fertilizing with fertilizer containing N in a form of an amino acids complex.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:13:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-681f5fd0d8d6469aa2c463f63a7ba252
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0472
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:13:12Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-681f5fd0d8d6469aa2c463f63a7ba2522023-11-20T10:35:26ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722020-08-0110936510.3390/agriculture10090365The Response of Maize Lines to Foliar FertilizingMilan Brankov0Milena Simić1Željko Dolijanović2Miloš Rajković3Violeta Mandić4Vesna Dragičević5Maize Research Institute “Zemun Polje”, Slobodana Bajića 1, 11185 Belgrade-Zemun, SerbiaMaize Research Institute “Zemun Polje”, Slobodana Bajića 1, 11185 Belgrade-Zemun, SerbiaFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, SerbiaInstitute for Field and Vegetable Crops, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaInstitute for Animal Husbandry, 11080 Zemun, SerbiaMaize Research Institute “Zemun Polje”, Slobodana Bajića 1, 11185 Belgrade-Zemun, SerbiaThe objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of two foliar fertilizers applied on five maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) lines. Fertilizers were applied at different growth stages of maize, during three consecutive years (2010–2012) at the experimental field of the Maize Research Institute “Zemun Polje”, Serbia. Maize growth parameters such as fresh matter, height, leaf area and grain yield were recorded. Foliar fertilizer with amino acids (FAA) was more advantageous to maize plants compared to fertilizer containing phosphorus (FP) as a main component. Applied FAA has shown positive effects by increasing fresh matter, leaf area index, and plant height in all three years. In 2012, due to unfavorable meteorological conditions, grain yield and harvest index were very low, compared to the previous two years, although, positive effects on morphological traits were observed 21 days after treatments (DAT), as well as in the anthesis stage. The best results of 30% of grain yield and harvest index increase were recorded in line L1 in 2010 and 2011. The same line had an increase of more than 40% of fresh matter and leaf area on average for all three years. The positive effects that have been noticed in this research could recommend foliar fertilizing with fertilizer containing N in a form of an amino acids complex.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/365cornmacro elementsmicroelements
spellingShingle Milan Brankov
Milena Simić
Željko Dolijanović
Miloš Rajković
Violeta Mandić
Vesna Dragičević
The Response of Maize Lines to Foliar Fertilizing
Agriculture
corn
macro elements
microelements
title The Response of Maize Lines to Foliar Fertilizing
title_full The Response of Maize Lines to Foliar Fertilizing
title_fullStr The Response of Maize Lines to Foliar Fertilizing
title_full_unstemmed The Response of Maize Lines to Foliar Fertilizing
title_short The Response of Maize Lines to Foliar Fertilizing
title_sort response of maize lines to foliar fertilizing
topic corn
macro elements
microelements
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/9/365
work_keys_str_mv AT milanbrankov theresponseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT milenasimic theresponseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT zeljkodolijanovic theresponseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT milosrajkovic theresponseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT violetamandic theresponseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT vesnadragicevic theresponseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT milanbrankov responseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT milenasimic responseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT zeljkodolijanovic responseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT milosrajkovic responseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT violetamandic responseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing
AT vesnadragicevic responseofmaizelinestofoliarfertilizing