The Interaction of Science and Philosophy in the Present Age Two Dutch Philosophers: Herman Philipse and Hans Achterhuis

Herman Philipse considers “religious beliefs, faith and religion [to be] incompatible with science or reason”; he defines religion scientifically and specifically rejects religious doctrine. He describes reason “… as the whole of methods of empirical scientific research and critical discursive think...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hans Dassen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages 2021-10-01
Series:Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_13840_93f21db2a4b06d470931d9483e1cac07.pdf
_version_ 1797704855528144896
author Hans Dassen
author_facet Hans Dassen
author_sort Hans Dassen
collection DOAJ
description Herman Philipse considers “religious beliefs, faith and religion [to be] incompatible with science or reason”; he defines religion scientifically and specifically rejects religious doctrine. He describes reason “… as the whole of methods of empirical scientific research and critical discursive thinking as they have evolved in the scientific tradition and will continue to develop in the future” and he defines “… the phenomenon of conscience as a mental organ that can be scientifically explained and that makes the religious explanation superfluous …”. Herman Philipse classifies science as the highest in rank, discards religion and sees philosophy, a rational view of the world, as based solely on the sciences. For his subject, Hans Achterhuis “… primarily cites biologists, ethologists and evolutionary psychologists with a philosophical interest” because “they presently have more to offer [him] than do his immediate colleagues”. Furthermore, “… it will be clear that ethologists and sociobiologists are of the opinion that the violent behaviour of human beings must be understood in part from the point of view of the evolutionary history of the sort ….. most philosophers and anthropologists are not aware of this. Their considerations suggest that violence only entered our world together with humankind”. Achterhuis’s choice is a “historic concept of violence”.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:27:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6832c5b4d8c64188957b12a8e0cbcafc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-7960
2423-4419
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:27:39Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages
record_format Article
series Journal of Philosophical Investigations
spelling doaj.art-6832c5b4d8c64188957b12a8e0cbcafc2023-09-03T07:13:39ZengUniversity of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen LanguagesJournal of Philosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192021-10-011536728210.22034/jpiut.2021.1384013840The Interaction of Science and Philosophy in the Present Age Two Dutch Philosophers: Herman Philipse and Hans AchterhuisHans Dassen0Researcher, Anthroopos Foundation, Amsterdam, International Member of the Dutch Research School of Philosophy (OZSW), Faculty of Philosophy, University of Leiden, The NetherlandsHerman Philipse considers “religious beliefs, faith and religion [to be] incompatible with science or reason”; he defines religion scientifically and specifically rejects religious doctrine. He describes reason “… as the whole of methods of empirical scientific research and critical discursive thinking as they have evolved in the scientific tradition and will continue to develop in the future” and he defines “… the phenomenon of conscience as a mental organ that can be scientifically explained and that makes the religious explanation superfluous …”. Herman Philipse classifies science as the highest in rank, discards religion and sees philosophy, a rational view of the world, as based solely on the sciences. For his subject, Hans Achterhuis “… primarily cites biologists, ethologists and evolutionary psychologists with a philosophical interest” because “they presently have more to offer [him] than do his immediate colleagues”. Furthermore, “… it will be clear that ethologists and sociobiologists are of the opinion that the violent behaviour of human beings must be understood in part from the point of view of the evolutionary history of the sort ….. most philosophers and anthropologists are not aware of this. Their considerations suggest that violence only entered our world together with humankind”. Achterhuis’s choice is a “historic concept of violence”.https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_13840_93f21db2a4b06d470931d9483e1cac07.pdfphilosophyanthropologysciencecommunicationthe playing field of illusiontruthpower
spellingShingle Hans Dassen
The Interaction of Science and Philosophy in the Present Age Two Dutch Philosophers: Herman Philipse and Hans Achterhuis
Journal of Philosophical Investigations
philosophy
anthropology
science
communication
the playing field of illusion
truth
power
title The Interaction of Science and Philosophy in the Present Age Two Dutch Philosophers: Herman Philipse and Hans Achterhuis
title_full The Interaction of Science and Philosophy in the Present Age Two Dutch Philosophers: Herman Philipse and Hans Achterhuis
title_fullStr The Interaction of Science and Philosophy in the Present Age Two Dutch Philosophers: Herman Philipse and Hans Achterhuis
title_full_unstemmed The Interaction of Science and Philosophy in the Present Age Two Dutch Philosophers: Herman Philipse and Hans Achterhuis
title_short The Interaction of Science and Philosophy in the Present Age Two Dutch Philosophers: Herman Philipse and Hans Achterhuis
title_sort interaction of science and philosophy in the present age two dutch philosophers herman philipse and hans achterhuis
topic philosophy
anthropology
science
communication
the playing field of illusion
truth
power
url https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_13840_93f21db2a4b06d470931d9483e1cac07.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hansdassen theinteractionofscienceandphilosophyinthepresentagetwodutchphilosophershermanphilipseandhansachterhuis
AT hansdassen interactionofscienceandphilosophyinthepresentagetwodutchphilosophershermanphilipseandhansachterhuis