The Role of the Status-Quo in Dynamic Bargaining

We analyze a dynamic bargaining game where parties can agree to implement a policy change, which is costly (beneficial) in the short-run but beneficial (costly) in the long-run. When the status-quo is endogenized (at least in some components), we show that the more farsighted party can induce their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Francesca Flamini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Games
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/3/35
_version_ 1827737276675784704
author Francesca Flamini
author_facet Francesca Flamini
author_sort Francesca Flamini
collection DOAJ
description We analyze a dynamic bargaining game where parties can agree to implement a policy change, which is costly (beneficial) in the short-run but beneficial (costly) in the long-run. When the status-quo is endogenized (at least in some components), we show that the more farsighted party can induce their rival to accept the short-run costs of policy changes designed to generate benefits in the long-run. This is more common when players’ asymmetries are less pronounced, the status-quo is fully endogenized and the state depreciates more quickly.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:26:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6836ae7a6d964b85affa966f9c081962
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4336
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:26:23Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Games
spelling doaj.art-6836ae7a6d964b85affa966f9c0819622023-11-18T10:31:22ZengMDPI AGGames2073-43362023-04-011433510.3390/g14030035The Role of the Status-Quo in Dynamic BargainingFrancesca Flamini0Economics, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UKWe analyze a dynamic bargaining game where parties can agree to implement a policy change, which is costly (beneficial) in the short-run but beneficial (costly) in the long-run. When the status-quo is endogenized (at least in some components), we show that the more farsighted party can induce their rival to accept the short-run costs of policy changes designed to generate benefits in the long-run. This is more common when players’ asymmetries are less pronounced, the status-quo is fully endogenized and the state depreciates more quickly.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/3/35bargaininginvestmentstatus-quo
spellingShingle Francesca Flamini
The Role of the Status-Quo in Dynamic Bargaining
Games
bargaining
investment
status-quo
title The Role of the Status-Quo in Dynamic Bargaining
title_full The Role of the Status-Quo in Dynamic Bargaining
title_fullStr The Role of the Status-Quo in Dynamic Bargaining
title_full_unstemmed The Role of the Status-Quo in Dynamic Bargaining
title_short The Role of the Status-Quo in Dynamic Bargaining
title_sort role of the status quo in dynamic bargaining
topic bargaining
investment
status-quo
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/3/35
work_keys_str_mv AT francescaflamini theroleofthestatusquoindynamicbargaining
AT francescaflamini roleofthestatusquoindynamicbargaining