Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy

A residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for breast cancer (BC) is associated with worse treatment outcomes compared to patients who achieved pathologic complete remission. This single-institutional retrospective study of 767 consecutive patients, including 468 patients with assessab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milos Holanek, Iveta Selingerova, Pavel Fabian, Oldrich Coufal, Ondrej Zapletal, Katarina Petrakova, Tomas Kazda, Roman Hrstka, Alexandr Poprach, Maria Zvarikova, Ondrej Bilek, Marek Svoboda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1740
_version_ 1827597446489833472
author Milos Holanek
Iveta Selingerova
Pavel Fabian
Oldrich Coufal
Ondrej Zapletal
Katarina Petrakova
Tomas Kazda
Roman Hrstka
Alexandr Poprach
Maria Zvarikova
Ondrej Bilek
Marek Svoboda
author_facet Milos Holanek
Iveta Selingerova
Pavel Fabian
Oldrich Coufal
Ondrej Zapletal
Katarina Petrakova
Tomas Kazda
Roman Hrstka
Alexandr Poprach
Maria Zvarikova
Ondrej Bilek
Marek Svoboda
author_sort Milos Holanek
collection DOAJ
description A residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for breast cancer (BC) is associated with worse treatment outcomes compared to patients who achieved pathologic complete remission. This single-institutional retrospective study of 767 consecutive patients, including 468 patients with assessable residual cancer burden (aRCB) after NAT, with a median follow-up of 36 months, evaluated the biomarkers assessed before NAT from a biopsy and after NAT from a surgical specimen, their dynamics, and effect on long-term outcomes in specific breast cancer subtypes. The leading focus was on proliferation index Ki-67, which was significantly altered by NAT in all BC subtypes (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for HER2 positive and luminal A/B HER2 negative and <i>p</i> = 0.001 for TNBC). Multivariable analysis showed pre-NAT and post-NAT Ki-67 as independent predictors of survival outcomes for luminal A/B HER2 negative subtype. For TNBC, post-NAT Ki-67 was significant alone, and, for HER2 positive, the only borderline association of pre-NAT Ki-67 was observed in relation to the overall survival. Steroid and HER2 receptors were re-assessed just in a portion of the patients with aRCB. The concordance of both assessments was 92.9% for ER status, 80.1% for PR, and 92.2% for HER2. In conclusion, these real-world data of a consecutive cohort confirmed the importance of biomarkers assessment in patients with aRCB, and the need to consider specific BC subtypes when interpreting their influence on prognosis.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:31:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-683bdd4ed2e2407987165083b0d972a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:31:29Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-683bdd4ed2e2407987165083b0d972a62023-12-03T14:55:24ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182022-07-01127174010.3390/diagnostics12071740Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant TherapyMilos Holanek0Iveta Selingerova1Pavel Fabian2Oldrich Coufal3Ondrej Zapletal4Katarina Petrakova5Tomas Kazda6Roman Hrstka7Alexandr Poprach8Maria Zvarikova9Ondrej Bilek10Marek Svoboda11Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicResearch Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Oncological Pathology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Breast, Skin and Oncoplastic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Breast, Skin and Oncoplastic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicResearch Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech RepublicA residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for breast cancer (BC) is associated with worse treatment outcomes compared to patients who achieved pathologic complete remission. This single-institutional retrospective study of 767 consecutive patients, including 468 patients with assessable residual cancer burden (aRCB) after NAT, with a median follow-up of 36 months, evaluated the biomarkers assessed before NAT from a biopsy and after NAT from a surgical specimen, their dynamics, and effect on long-term outcomes in specific breast cancer subtypes. The leading focus was on proliferation index Ki-67, which was significantly altered by NAT in all BC subtypes (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for HER2 positive and luminal A/B HER2 negative and <i>p</i> = 0.001 for TNBC). Multivariable analysis showed pre-NAT and post-NAT Ki-67 as independent predictors of survival outcomes for luminal A/B HER2 negative subtype. For TNBC, post-NAT Ki-67 was significant alone, and, for HER2 positive, the only borderline association of pre-NAT Ki-67 was observed in relation to the overall survival. Steroid and HER2 receptors were re-assessed just in a portion of the patients with aRCB. The concordance of both assessments was 92.9% for ER status, 80.1% for PR, and 92.2% for HER2. In conclusion, these real-world data of a consecutive cohort confirmed the importance of biomarkers assessment in patients with aRCB, and the need to consider specific BC subtypes when interpreting their influence on prognosis.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1740breast cancerneoadjuvant therapypathological complete responseresidual cancer burdenbiomarkersKI-67
spellingShingle Milos Holanek
Iveta Selingerova
Pavel Fabian
Oldrich Coufal
Ondrej Zapletal
Katarina Petrakova
Tomas Kazda
Roman Hrstka
Alexandr Poprach
Maria Zvarikova
Ondrej Bilek
Marek Svoboda
Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy
Diagnostics
breast cancer
neoadjuvant therapy
pathological complete response
residual cancer burden
biomarkers
KI-67
title Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_full Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_fullStr Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_short Biomarker Dynamics and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients with Residual Cancer Burden after Neoadjuvant Therapy
title_sort biomarker dynamics and long term treatment outcomes in breast cancer patients with residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant therapy
topic breast cancer
neoadjuvant therapy
pathological complete response
residual cancer burden
biomarkers
KI-67
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1740
work_keys_str_mv AT milosholanek biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT ivetaselingerova biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT pavelfabian biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT oldrichcoufal biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT ondrejzapletal biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT katarinapetrakova biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT tomaskazda biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT romanhrstka biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT alexandrpoprach biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT mariazvarikova biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT ondrejbilek biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT mareksvoboda biomarkerdynamicsandlongtermtreatmentoutcomesinbreastcancerpatientswithresidualcancerburdenafterneoadjuvanttherapy