2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485–90.)

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Journals Sweden 2016-05-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1156932
_version_ 1819275865897304064
collection DOAJ
first_indexed 2024-12-23T23:31:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-684047c6ee184094b9ff5ea800697359
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-3674
1745-3682
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T23:31:07Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Medical Journals Sweden
record_format Article
series Acta Orthopaedica
spelling doaj.art-684047c6ee184094b9ff5ea8006973592022-12-21T17:26:02ZengMedical Journals SwedenActa Orthopaedica1745-36741745-36822016-05-0187331431710.3109/17453674.2016.115693211569322D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485–90.)http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1156932
spellingShingle 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485–90.)
Acta Orthopaedica
title 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485–90.)
title_full 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485–90.)
title_fullStr 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485–90.)
title_full_unstemmed 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485–90.)
title_short 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485–90.)
title_sort 2d measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3d measurements acta orthop 2015 86 4 485 90
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1156932