Atrial fibrillation type modulates the clinical predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as an indicator of a systemic inflammatory response. There are baseline differences in the inflammation status between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent AF (PerAF). The NLR changes and late recurrences of AF (LR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masamichi Yano, Yasuyuki Egami, Kohei Ukita, Akito Kawamura, Hitoshi Nakamura, Yutaka Matsuhiro, Koji Yasumoto, Masaki Tsuda, Naotaka Okamoto, Akihiro Tanaka, Yasuharu Matsunaga-Lee, Ryu Shutta, Masami Nishino, Jun Tanouchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906720303626
Description
Summary:Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as an indicator of a systemic inflammatory response. There are baseline differences in the inflammation status between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent AF (PerAF). The NLR changes and late recurrences of AF (LRAF) after ablation depending on the AF type remain unknown. Methods: Consecutive AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency catheter ablation were enrolled from September 2014 to June 2018. The peripheral blood leukocyte NLR 1 day before and 36–48 h after PVI were measured. First, the relationship between NLR changes after to before ablation (ΔNLR) and ERAFs/LRAFs in PAF and PerAF patients were investigated to exclude the baseline inflammation status and evaluate catheter ablation induced inflammation. Second, the clinical impact of the NLR for predicting LRAFs was evaluated. Results: There hundred sixty-nine PAF and 264 PerAF patients from Osaka Rosai AF registry were enrolled. The ratio of ERAFs/LRAFs in PAF and PerAF patients were 26.8%/22.5% and 39.4%/29.9%, respectively. In PAF and PerAF patients, the ΔNLR was significantly higher with ERAF than no-ERAF (p = 0.022 and p = 0.010, respectively). In PAF patients, the ΔNLR was significantly higher with LRAF than no-LRAF (p = 0.017), while with PerAF, the ΔNLR did not significantly differ between LRAFs and no-LRAFs. In PAF, the ΔNLR was independently and significantly associated with LRAFs after PVI (p = 0.029). Conclusion: The ΔNLR was significantly higher only in PAF patients with LRAFs than no-LRAFs, but not in PerAF patients. The ΔNLR was useful for predicting LRAFs after PVI in PAF patients.
ISSN:2352-9067