Nasal washes vs nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of respiratory pathogens
Background: Respiratory virus testing is frustrated by low sensitivity, estimated as low as 70%. One cause for this may be the method of sampling used. The question of which method of sampling yields pathogens with optimal sensitivity between nasopharyngeal swabs, nasal washes and aspirates was answ...
Main Author: | Matthew Flynn |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Clinical Infection in Practice |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590170221000522 |
Similar Items
-
Nasopharyngeal Swabs vs. Nasal Aspirates for Respiratory Virus Detection: A Systematic Review
by: Matthew F. Flynn, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
Comparison between nasopharyngeal swab and nasal wash, using culture and PCR, in the detection of potential respiratory pathogens
by: El Batrawy Sherouk, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01) -
Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
by: Florian Hitzenbichler, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Comparison of “hock-a-loogie” saliva versus nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for detecting common respiratory pathogens
by: Renke Chen, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
The Clinical Performance of the BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viruses and Bacteria from Nasopharyngeal Swabs
by: Xin Zhang, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)