Clinical implications of serum N‐glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ‐cell tumors

Abstract Serum biomarker monitoring is essential for management of germ‐cell tumors (GCT). However, not all GCT are positive for conventional tumor markers. We examined whether serum N‐glycan‐based biomarkers can be applied for detection and prognosis in patients with GCT. We performed a comprehensi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takuma Narita, Shingo Hatakeyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Shintaro Narita, Shinichi Yamashita, Koji Mitsuzuka, Toshihiko Sakurai, Sadafumi Kawamura, Tatsuo Tochigi, Ippei Takahashi, Shigeyuki Nakaji, Yuki Tobisawa, Hayato Yamamoto, Takuya Koie, Norihiko Tsuchiya, Tomonori Habuchi, Yoichi Arai, Chikara Ohyama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-04-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1035
_version_ 1828179412031373312
author Takuma Narita
Shingo Hatakeyama
Tohru Yoneyama
Shintaro Narita
Shinichi Yamashita
Koji Mitsuzuka
Toshihiko Sakurai
Sadafumi Kawamura
Tatsuo Tochigi
Ippei Takahashi
Shigeyuki Nakaji
Yuki Tobisawa
Hayato Yamamoto
Takuya Koie
Norihiko Tsuchiya
Tomonori Habuchi
Yoichi Arai
Chikara Ohyama
author_facet Takuma Narita
Shingo Hatakeyama
Tohru Yoneyama
Shintaro Narita
Shinichi Yamashita
Koji Mitsuzuka
Toshihiko Sakurai
Sadafumi Kawamura
Tatsuo Tochigi
Ippei Takahashi
Shigeyuki Nakaji
Yuki Tobisawa
Hayato Yamamoto
Takuya Koie
Norihiko Tsuchiya
Tomonori Habuchi
Yoichi Arai
Chikara Ohyama
author_sort Takuma Narita
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Serum biomarker monitoring is essential for management of germ‐cell tumors (GCT). However, not all GCT are positive for conventional tumor markers. We examined whether serum N‐glycan‐based biomarkers can be applied for detection and prognosis in patients with GCT. We performed a comprehensive N‐glycan structural analysis of sera from 54 untreated GCT patients and 103 age‐adjusted healthy volunteers using glycoblotting methods and mass spectrometry. Candidate N‐glycans were selected from those with the highest association; cutoff concentration values were established, and an N‐glycan score was created based on the number of positive N‐glycans present. The validity of this score for diagnosis and prognosis was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We identified five candidate N‐glycans significantly associated with GCT patients. The accuracy of the N‐glycan score for GCT was significant with an area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC) value of 0.87. Diagnostically, the N‐glycan score detected 10 of 12 (83%) patients with negative conventional tumor markers. Prognostically, the N‐glycan score comprised four candidate N‐glycans. The predictive value of the prognostic N‐glycan score was significant, with an AUC value of 0.89. A high value prognostic N‐glycan score was significantly associated with poor prognosis. Finally, to identify a potential carrier protein, immunoglobulin (Ig) fractions of sera were subjected to N‐glycan analysis and compared to whole sera. Candidate N‐glycans in Ig‐fractions were significantly decreased; therefore, the carrier protein for candidate N‐glycans is likely not an immunoglobulin. In summary, our newly developed N‐glycan score seems to be a practical diagnostic and prognostic method for GCT.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T05:28:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-685e44249ed44e67b41894c599575e03
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T05:28:53Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-685e44249ed44e67b41894c599575e032022-12-22T03:46:10ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342017-04-016473974810.1002/cam4.1035Clinical implications of serum N‐glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ‐cell tumorsTakuma Narita0Shingo Hatakeyama1Tohru Yoneyama2Shintaro Narita3Shinichi Yamashita4Koji Mitsuzuka5Toshihiko Sakurai6Sadafumi Kawamura7Tatsuo Tochigi8Ippei Takahashi9Shigeyuki Nakaji10Yuki Tobisawa11Hayato Yamamoto12Takuya Koie13Norihiko Tsuchiya14Tomonori Habuchi15Yoichi Arai16Chikara Ohyama17Department of Urology Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanDepartment of Urology Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanDepartment of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanDepartment of Urology Akita University Graduate School of Medicine Akita JapanDepartment of Urology Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai JapanDepartment of Urology Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai JapanDepartment of Urology Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine Yamagata JapanDepartment of Urology Miyagi Cancer Center Natori JapanDepartment of Urology Miyagi Cancer Center Natori JapanDepartment of Social Medicine Hirosaki University School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanDepartment of Social Medicine Hirosaki University School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanDepartment of Urology Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanDepartment of Urology Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanDepartment of Urology Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanDepartment of Urology Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine Yamagata JapanDepartment of Urology Akita University Graduate School of Medicine Akita JapanDepartment of Urology Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Sendai JapanDepartment of Urology Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki JapanAbstract Serum biomarker monitoring is essential for management of germ‐cell tumors (GCT). However, not all GCT are positive for conventional tumor markers. We examined whether serum N‐glycan‐based biomarkers can be applied for detection and prognosis in patients with GCT. We performed a comprehensive N‐glycan structural analysis of sera from 54 untreated GCT patients and 103 age‐adjusted healthy volunteers using glycoblotting methods and mass spectrometry. Candidate N‐glycans were selected from those with the highest association; cutoff concentration values were established, and an N‐glycan score was created based on the number of positive N‐glycans present. The validity of this score for diagnosis and prognosis was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We identified five candidate N‐glycans significantly associated with GCT patients. The accuracy of the N‐glycan score for GCT was significant with an area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC) value of 0.87. Diagnostically, the N‐glycan score detected 10 of 12 (83%) patients with negative conventional tumor markers. Prognostically, the N‐glycan score comprised four candidate N‐glycans. The predictive value of the prognostic N‐glycan score was significant, with an AUC value of 0.89. A high value prognostic N‐glycan score was significantly associated with poor prognosis. Finally, to identify a potential carrier protein, immunoglobulin (Ig) fractions of sera were subjected to N‐glycan analysis and compared to whole sera. Candidate N‐glycans in Ig‐fractions were significantly decreased; therefore, the carrier protein for candidate N‐glycans is likely not an immunoglobulin. In summary, our newly developed N‐glycan score seems to be a practical diagnostic and prognostic method for GCT.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1035Biomarkergerm‐cell tumorsglycoblottingmass spectrometryserum N‐glycan
spellingShingle Takuma Narita
Shingo Hatakeyama
Tohru Yoneyama
Shintaro Narita
Shinichi Yamashita
Koji Mitsuzuka
Toshihiko Sakurai
Sadafumi Kawamura
Tatsuo Tochigi
Ippei Takahashi
Shigeyuki Nakaji
Yuki Tobisawa
Hayato Yamamoto
Takuya Koie
Norihiko Tsuchiya
Tomonori Habuchi
Yoichi Arai
Chikara Ohyama
Clinical implications of serum N‐glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ‐cell tumors
Cancer Medicine
Biomarker
germ‐cell tumors
glycoblotting
mass spectrometry
serum N‐glycan
title Clinical implications of serum N‐glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ‐cell tumors
title_full Clinical implications of serum N‐glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ‐cell tumors
title_fullStr Clinical implications of serum N‐glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ‐cell tumors
title_full_unstemmed Clinical implications of serum N‐glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ‐cell tumors
title_short Clinical implications of serum N‐glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ‐cell tumors
title_sort clinical implications of serum n glycan profiling as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in germ cell tumors
topic Biomarker
germ‐cell tumors
glycoblotting
mass spectrometry
serum N‐glycan
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1035
work_keys_str_mv AT takumanarita clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT shingohatakeyama clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT tohruyoneyama clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT shintaronarita clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT shinichiyamashita clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT kojimitsuzuka clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT toshihikosakurai clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT sadafumikawamura clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT tatsuotochigi clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT ippeitakahashi clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT shigeyukinakaji clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT yukitobisawa clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT hayatoyamamoto clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT takuyakoie clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT norihikotsuchiya clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT tomonorihabuchi clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT yoichiarai clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors
AT chikaraohyama clinicalimplicationsofserumnglycanprofilingasadiagnosticandprognosticbiomarkeringermcelltumors