La cliometría y la historia económica institucional: Reflejos Latinoamericanos.

This essay narrates the development of cliometrics and neo-institutional history in the United States and its problems of acceptance among Latin American academics in general and in Colombia in particular. There is rivalry between the two schools because they respond to somewhat different theoretica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Salomón Kalmanovitz.
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de los Andes 2004-01-01
Series:Historia Crítica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://historiacritica.uniandes.edu.co/view.php/325/index.php?id=325
Description
Summary:This essay narrates the development of cliometrics and neo-institutional history in the United States and its problems of acceptance among Latin American academics in general and in Colombia in particular. There is rivalry between the two schools because they respond to somewhat different theoretical bases: whereas the former is based on neo- classical economic theory, the second questions its assumptions about the absence of frictions and institutions. Modern economic history had to compete with dependency theory in Latin America and only found some acceptance when the latter began to show problems of inconsistency, lack of rigour, absence of falseability tests, and inability to predict. Cliometrics was rejected from the start in Colombia, together with William P. McGreevey's Economic History of Colombia, and it took more than twenty years for it to recover recognition of its usefulness for understanding the past, while neo-institutional history is only just beginning to be accepted.
ISSN:0121-1617
1900-6152