A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 Treatment
BackgroundFatigue is one of the most common symptoms treated in primary care and can lead to deficits in mental health and functioning. Light therapy can be an effective treatment for symptoms of fatigue; however, the feasibility, scalability, and individual-level heterogenei...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2023-09-01
|
Series: | JMIR Formative Research |
Online Access: | https://formative.jmir.org/2023/1/e45510 |
_version_ | 1827815154827395072 |
---|---|
author | Mark Butler Stefani D’Angelo Heejoon Ahn Thevaa Chandereng Danielle Miller Alexandra Perrin Anne-Marie N Romain Ava Scatoni Ciaran P Friel Ying-Kuen Cheung Karina W Davidson |
author_facet | Mark Butler Stefani D’Angelo Heejoon Ahn Thevaa Chandereng Danielle Miller Alexandra Perrin Anne-Marie N Romain Ava Scatoni Ciaran P Friel Ying-Kuen Cheung Karina W Davidson |
author_sort | Mark Butler |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
BackgroundFatigue is one of the most common symptoms treated in primary care and can lead to deficits in mental health and functioning. Light therapy can be an effective treatment for symptoms of fatigue; however, the feasibility, scalability, and individual-level heterogeneity of light therapy for fatigue are unknown.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a series of personalized (N-of-1) interventions for the virtual delivery of bright light (BL) therapy and dim light (DL) therapy versus usual care (UC) treatment for fatigue in 60 participants.
MethodsParticipants completed satisfaction surveys comprising the System Usability Scale (SUS) and items assessing satisfaction with the components of the personalized trial. Symptoms of fatigue were measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) daily, PROMIS weekly, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) questionnaires delivered 3 times daily. Comparisons of fatigue between the BL, DL, and UC treatment periods were conducted using generalized linear mixed model analyses between participants and generalized least squares analyses within individual participants.
ResultsParticipants rated the usability of the personalized trial as acceptable (average SUS score=78.9, SD 15.6), and 92% (49/53) of those who completed satisfaction surveys stated that they would recommend the trial to others. The levels of fatigue symptoms measured using the PROMIS daily fatigue measure were lower or improved in the BL (B=−1.63, 95% CI −2.63 to −0.63) and DL (B=−1.44, 95% CI −2.50 to −0.38) periods relative to UC. The treatment effects of BL and DL on the PROMIS daily measure varied among participants. Similar findings were demonstrated for the PROMIS weekly and EMA measures of fatigue symptoms.
ConclusionsThe participant scores on the SUS and satisfaction surveys suggest that personalized N-of-1 trials of light therapy for fatigue symptoms are both feasible and acceptable. Both interventions produced significant (P<.05) reductions in participant-reported PROMIS and EMA fatigue symptoms relative to UC. However, the heterogeneity of these treatment effects across participants indicated that the effect of light therapy was not uniform. This heterogeneity along with high ratings of usability and satisfaction support the use of personalized N-of-1 research designs in evaluating the effect of light therapy on fatigue for each patient. Furthermore, the results of this trial provide additional support for the use of a series of personalized N-of-1 research trials.
Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04707846; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04707846 |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:56:00Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-686b56c527b04b20b2f300b02bf7089e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2561-326X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:56:00Z |
publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | JMIR Formative Research |
spelling | doaj.art-686b56c527b04b20b2f300b02bf7089e2023-09-18T13:16:29ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2023-09-017e4551010.2196/45510A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 TreatmentMark Butlerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4359-2897Stefani D’Angelohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-8284Heejoon Ahnhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4938-4909Thevaa Chanderenghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4078-9176Danielle Millerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0102-1263Alexandra Perrinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9099-2482Anne-Marie N Romainhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1798-1792Ava Scatonihttps://orcid.org/0009-0007-9283-1256Ciaran P Frielhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9882-2851Ying-Kuen Cheunghttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8530-035XKarina W Davidsonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-477X BackgroundFatigue is one of the most common symptoms treated in primary care and can lead to deficits in mental health and functioning. Light therapy can be an effective treatment for symptoms of fatigue; however, the feasibility, scalability, and individual-level heterogeneity of light therapy for fatigue are unknown. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a series of personalized (N-of-1) interventions for the virtual delivery of bright light (BL) therapy and dim light (DL) therapy versus usual care (UC) treatment for fatigue in 60 participants. MethodsParticipants completed satisfaction surveys comprising the System Usability Scale (SUS) and items assessing satisfaction with the components of the personalized trial. Symptoms of fatigue were measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) daily, PROMIS weekly, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) questionnaires delivered 3 times daily. Comparisons of fatigue between the BL, DL, and UC treatment periods were conducted using generalized linear mixed model analyses between participants and generalized least squares analyses within individual participants. ResultsParticipants rated the usability of the personalized trial as acceptable (average SUS score=78.9, SD 15.6), and 92% (49/53) of those who completed satisfaction surveys stated that they would recommend the trial to others. The levels of fatigue symptoms measured using the PROMIS daily fatigue measure were lower or improved in the BL (B=−1.63, 95% CI −2.63 to −0.63) and DL (B=−1.44, 95% CI −2.50 to −0.38) periods relative to UC. The treatment effects of BL and DL on the PROMIS daily measure varied among participants. Similar findings were demonstrated for the PROMIS weekly and EMA measures of fatigue symptoms. ConclusionsThe participant scores on the SUS and satisfaction surveys suggest that personalized N-of-1 trials of light therapy for fatigue symptoms are both feasible and acceptable. Both interventions produced significant (P<.05) reductions in participant-reported PROMIS and EMA fatigue symptoms relative to UC. However, the heterogeneity of these treatment effects across participants indicated that the effect of light therapy was not uniform. This heterogeneity along with high ratings of usability and satisfaction support the use of personalized N-of-1 research designs in evaluating the effect of light therapy on fatigue for each patient. Furthermore, the results of this trial provide additional support for the use of a series of personalized N-of-1 research trials. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04707846; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04707846https://formative.jmir.org/2023/1/e45510 |
spellingShingle | Mark Butler Stefani D’Angelo Heejoon Ahn Thevaa Chandereng Danielle Miller Alexandra Perrin Anne-Marie N Romain Ava Scatoni Ciaran P Friel Ying-Kuen Cheung Karina W Davidson A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 Treatment JMIR Formative Research |
title | A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 Treatment |
title_full | A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 Treatment |
title_fullStr | A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 Treatment |
title_short | A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 Treatment |
title_sort | series of personalized virtual light therapy interventions for fatigue feasibility randomized crossover trial for n of 1 treatment |
url | https://formative.jmir.org/2023/1/e45510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markbutler aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT stefanidangelo aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT heejoonahn aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT thevaachandereng aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT daniellemiller aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT alexandraperrin aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT annemarienromain aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT avascatoni aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT ciaranpfriel aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT yingkuencheung aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT karinawdavidson aseriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT markbutler seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT stefanidangelo seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT heejoonahn seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT thevaachandereng seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT daniellemiller seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT alexandraperrin seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT annemarienromain seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT avascatoni seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT ciaranpfriel seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT yingkuencheung seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment AT karinawdavidson seriesofpersonalizedvirtuallighttherapyinterventionsforfatiguefeasibilityrandomizedcrossovertrialfornof1treatment |