Bovine milk microbiome: a more complex issue than expected

Abstract The aim of this study was to analyze bacterial profiles of bovine mastitic milk samples and samples from healthy quarters using Next Generation Sequencing of amplicons from 16S rRNA genes and to compare results with microbiological results by PCR assays of the same samples. A total of 49 sa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suvi Taponen, David McGuinness, Heidi Hiitiö, Heli Simojoki, Ruth Zadoks, Satu Pyörälä
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:Veterinary Research
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13567-019-0662-y
_version_ 1830474687715475456
author Suvi Taponen
David McGuinness
Heidi Hiitiö
Heli Simojoki
Ruth Zadoks
Satu Pyörälä
author_facet Suvi Taponen
David McGuinness
Heidi Hiitiö
Heli Simojoki
Ruth Zadoks
Satu Pyörälä
author_sort Suvi Taponen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The aim of this study was to analyze bacterial profiles of bovine mastitic milk samples and samples from healthy quarters using Next Generation Sequencing of amplicons from 16S rRNA genes and to compare results with microbiological results by PCR assays of the same samples. A total of 49 samples were collected from one single dairy herd during the same day. The samples were divided in two sample sets, which were used in this study. The DNA extraction as well as the library preparation and sequencing of these two sets were performed separately, and results of the two datasets were then compared. The vast majority of genera detected appeared with low read numbers and/or in only a few samples. Results of PCR and microbiome analyses of samples infected with major pathogens Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus uberis were consistent as these genera also covered the majority of reads detected in the microbiome analysis. Analysis of alpha diversity revealed a much higher species richness in set 1 than in set 2. The dominating bacterial genera with the highest read numbers clearly differed between datasets, especially in PCR negative samples and samples positive for minor pathogens. In addition to this, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was conducted between the two sets to identify significantly different genera/family level microbes. The genus Methylobacterium was much more common in set 2 compared to set 1, and genus Streptococcus more common in set 1. Our results indicate amplification of contaminating bacteria in excess in samples with no or minor amounts of pathogen DNA in dataset 2. There is a need for critical assessment of results of milk microbiome analyses.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T15:23:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-687e81e0899541c1b2362bfbf547e6ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1297-9716
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T15:23:05Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Veterinary Research
spelling doaj.art-687e81e0899541c1b2362bfbf547e6ee2022-12-21T18:58:59ZengBMCVeterinary Research1297-97162019-06-0150111510.1186/s13567-019-0662-yBovine milk microbiome: a more complex issue than expectedSuvi Taponen0David McGuinness1Heidi Hiitiö2Heli Simojoki3Ruth Zadoks4Satu Pyörälä5Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of HelsinkiGlasgow Polyomics, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of GlasgowDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of HelsinkiDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of HelsinkiInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of GlasgowDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of HelsinkiAbstract The aim of this study was to analyze bacterial profiles of bovine mastitic milk samples and samples from healthy quarters using Next Generation Sequencing of amplicons from 16S rRNA genes and to compare results with microbiological results by PCR assays of the same samples. A total of 49 samples were collected from one single dairy herd during the same day. The samples were divided in two sample sets, which were used in this study. The DNA extraction as well as the library preparation and sequencing of these two sets were performed separately, and results of the two datasets were then compared. The vast majority of genera detected appeared with low read numbers and/or in only a few samples. Results of PCR and microbiome analyses of samples infected with major pathogens Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus uberis were consistent as these genera also covered the majority of reads detected in the microbiome analysis. Analysis of alpha diversity revealed a much higher species richness in set 1 than in set 2. The dominating bacterial genera with the highest read numbers clearly differed between datasets, especially in PCR negative samples and samples positive for minor pathogens. In addition to this, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was conducted between the two sets to identify significantly different genera/family level microbes. The genus Methylobacterium was much more common in set 2 compared to set 1, and genus Streptococcus more common in set 1. Our results indicate amplification of contaminating bacteria in excess in samples with no or minor amounts of pathogen DNA in dataset 2. There is a need for critical assessment of results of milk microbiome analyses.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13567-019-0662-y
spellingShingle Suvi Taponen
David McGuinness
Heidi Hiitiö
Heli Simojoki
Ruth Zadoks
Satu Pyörälä
Bovine milk microbiome: a more complex issue than expected
Veterinary Research
title Bovine milk microbiome: a more complex issue than expected
title_full Bovine milk microbiome: a more complex issue than expected
title_fullStr Bovine milk microbiome: a more complex issue than expected
title_full_unstemmed Bovine milk microbiome: a more complex issue than expected
title_short Bovine milk microbiome: a more complex issue than expected
title_sort bovine milk microbiome a more complex issue than expected
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13567-019-0662-y
work_keys_str_mv AT suvitaponen bovinemilkmicrobiomeamorecomplexissuethanexpected
AT davidmcguinness bovinemilkmicrobiomeamorecomplexissuethanexpected
AT heidihiitio bovinemilkmicrobiomeamorecomplexissuethanexpected
AT helisimojoki bovinemilkmicrobiomeamorecomplexissuethanexpected
AT ruthzadoks bovinemilkmicrobiomeamorecomplexissuethanexpected
AT satupyorala bovinemilkmicrobiomeamorecomplexissuethanexpected