We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood

The article takes issue with the proposal that dominant accounts of collective intentionality suffer from an individualist bias and that one should instead reverse the order of explanation and give primacy to the we and the community. It discusses different versions of the community first view and a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zahavi Dan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Vienna 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Social Ontology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0076
_version_ 1797721778625183744
author Zahavi Dan
author_facet Zahavi Dan
author_sort Zahavi Dan
collection DOAJ
description The article takes issue with the proposal that dominant accounts of collective intentionality suffer from an individualist bias and that one should instead reverse the order of explanation and give primacy to the we and the community. It discusses different versions of the community first view and argues that they fail because they operate with too simplistic a conception of what it means to be a self and misunderstand what it means to be (part of) a we. In presenting this argument, the article seeks to demonstrate that a thorough investigation of collective intentionality has to address the status and nature of the we, and that doing so will require an analysis of the relation between the we and the I, which in turn will call for a more explicit engagement with the question of selfhood than is customary in contemporary discussions of collective intentionality.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:38:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-68a1aa266be34a47b9f8f6352f97ce80
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-9655
2196-9663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:38:07Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher University of Vienna
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Ontology
spelling doaj.art-68a1aa266be34a47b9f8f6352f97ce802023-09-02T13:26:17ZengUniversity of ViennaJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632021-03-017112010.1515/jso-2020-0076We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and SelfhoodZahavi Dan0Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkThe article takes issue with the proposal that dominant accounts of collective intentionality suffer from an individualist bias and that one should instead reverse the order of explanation and give primacy to the we and the community. It discusses different versions of the community first view and argues that they fail because they operate with too simplistic a conception of what it means to be a self and misunderstand what it means to be (part of) a we. In presenting this argument, the article seeks to demonstrate that a thorough investigation of collective intentionality has to address the status and nature of the we, and that doing so will require an analysis of the relation between the we and the I, which in turn will call for a more explicit engagement with the question of selfhood than is customary in contemporary discussions of collective intentionality.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0076collective intentionalityselfhoodwecollective identitygroup experiences
spellingShingle Zahavi Dan
We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood
Journal of Social Ontology
collective intentionality
selfhood
we
collective identity
group experiences
title We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood
title_full We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood
title_fullStr We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood
title_full_unstemmed We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood
title_short We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood
title_sort we in me or me in we collective intentionality and selfhood
topic collective intentionality
selfhood
we
collective identity
group experiences
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0076
work_keys_str_mv AT zahavidan weinmeormeinwecollectiveintentionalityandselfhood