Revision of J3Gen and Validity of the Attacks by Peinado et al.

This letter is the reply to: Remarks on Peinado et al.’s Analysis of J3Gen by J. Garcia-Alfaro, J. Herrera-Joancomartí and J. Melià-Seguí published in Sensors 2015, 15, 6217–6220. Peinado et al. cryptanalyzed the pseudorandom number generator proposed by Melià-Seguí et al., describing two possible a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alberto Peinado, Jorge Munilla, Amparo Fúster-Sabater
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/15/5/11988
Description
Summary:This letter is the reply to: Remarks on Peinado et al.’s Analysis of J3Gen by J. Garcia-Alfaro, J. Herrera-Joancomartí and J. Melià-Seguí published in Sensors 2015, 15, 6217–6220. Peinado et al. cryptanalyzed the pseudorandom number generator proposed by Melià-Seguí et al., describing two possible attacks. Later, Garcia-Alfaro claimed that one of this attack did not hold in practice because the assumptions made by Peinado et al. were not correct. This letter reviews those remarks, showing that J3Gen is anyway flawed and that, without further information, the interpretation made by Peinado et al. seems to be correct.
ISSN:1424-8220