Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper
[Introduction] The ICD-11 and DSM-5 are the leading systems for the classification of mental disorders, and their relevance for clinical work and research, as well as their impact for policy making and legal questions, has increased considerably. In recent years, other frameworks have been proposed...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Clinical Psychology in Europe |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11699 |
| _version_ | 1827355613385981952 |
|---|---|
| author | Winfried Rief Stefan G. Hofmann Max Berg Miriam K. Forbes Diego A. Pizzagalli Johannes Zimmermann Eiko Fried Geoffrey M. Reed |
| author_facet | Winfried Rief Stefan G. Hofmann Max Berg Miriam K. Forbes Diego A. Pizzagalli Johannes Zimmermann Eiko Fried Geoffrey M. Reed |
| author_sort | Winfried Rief |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | [Introduction] The ICD-11 and DSM-5 are the leading systems for the classification of mental disorders, and their relevance for clinical work and research, as well as their impact for policy making and legal questions, has increased considerably. In recent years, other frameworks have been proposed to supplement or even replace the ICD and the DSM, raising many questions regarding clinical utility, scientific relevance, and, at the core, how best to conceptualize mental disorders. [Method] As examples of the new approaches that have emerged, here we introduce the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), systems and network approaches, process-based approaches, as well as a new approach to the classification of personality disorders. [Results and Discussion] We highlight main distinctions between these classification frameworks, largely related to different priorities and goals, and discuss areas of overlap and potential compatibility. Synergies among these systems may provide promising new avenues for research and clinical practice. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T04:45:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-68b5c234672746a9a23015aae53003c1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2625-3410 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T04:45:46Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Clinical Psychology in Europe |
| spelling | doaj.art-68b5c234672746a9a23015aae53003c12024-02-08T10:52:57ZengPsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for PsychologyClinical Psychology in Europe2625-34102023-12-015410.32872/cpe.11699cpe.11699Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion PaperWinfried Rief0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7019-2250Stefan G. Hofmann1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-9681Max Berg2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-7869Miriam K. Forbes3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-3818Diego A. Pizzagalli4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-1143Johannes Zimmermann5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-2356Eiko Fried6https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7469-594XGeoffrey M. Reed7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6572-4785Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Group, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, GermanyTranslational Clinical Psychology Group, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, GermanyClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Group, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, GermanySchool of Psychological Sciences, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research & McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USADepartment of Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, GermanyClinical Psychology Group, Department of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA[Introduction] The ICD-11 and DSM-5 are the leading systems for the classification of mental disorders, and their relevance for clinical work and research, as well as their impact for policy making and legal questions, has increased considerably. In recent years, other frameworks have been proposed to supplement or even replace the ICD and the DSM, raising many questions regarding clinical utility, scientific relevance, and, at the core, how best to conceptualize mental disorders. [Method] As examples of the new approaches that have emerged, here we introduce the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), systems and network approaches, process-based approaches, as well as a new approach to the classification of personality disorders. [Results and Discussion] We highlight main distinctions between these classification frameworks, largely related to different priorities and goals, and discuss areas of overlap and potential compatibility. Synergies among these systems may provide promising new avenues for research and clinical practice.https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11699icd-11dsm-5hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology hitopresearch domain criteria rdocnetwork theorypersonality disordersprocess-based therapy pbt |
| spellingShingle | Winfried Rief Stefan G. Hofmann Max Berg Miriam K. Forbes Diego A. Pizzagalli Johannes Zimmermann Eiko Fried Geoffrey M. Reed Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper Clinical Psychology in Europe icd-11 dsm-5 hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology hitop research domain criteria rdoc network theory personality disorders process-based therapy pbt |
| title | Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper |
| title_full | Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper |
| title_fullStr | Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper |
| title_short | Do We Need a Novel Framework for Classifying Psychopathology? A Discussion Paper |
| title_sort | do we need a novel framework for classifying psychopathology a discussion paper |
| topic | icd-11 dsm-5 hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology hitop research domain criteria rdoc network theory personality disorders process-based therapy pbt |
| url | https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11699 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT winfriedrief doweneedanovelframeworkforclassifyingpsychopathologyadiscussionpaper AT stefanghofmann doweneedanovelframeworkforclassifyingpsychopathologyadiscussionpaper AT maxberg doweneedanovelframeworkforclassifyingpsychopathologyadiscussionpaper AT miriamkforbes doweneedanovelframeworkforclassifyingpsychopathologyadiscussionpaper AT diegoapizzagalli doweneedanovelframeworkforclassifyingpsychopathologyadiscussionpaper AT johanneszimmermann doweneedanovelframeworkforclassifyingpsychopathologyadiscussionpaper AT eikofried doweneedanovelframeworkforclassifyingpsychopathologyadiscussionpaper AT geoffreymreed doweneedanovelframeworkforclassifyingpsychopathologyadiscussionpaper |