PROSPECTS OF THE LUBLIN TRIANGLE AFTER THE GRAIN DEAL FAILURE
The article analyses the current state of the Lublin Triangle with the forum facing a seri- ous challenge of stability and unity for the first time after Russia’s withdrawal from the grain deal. The study focuses on both some statements of the Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian presidents with- in the...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/1-2024/Matyukhin12024.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797236789623128064 |
|---|---|
| author | Denis S. Matyukhin Lev N. Klepatskii |
| author_facet | Denis S. Matyukhin Lev N. Klepatskii |
| author_sort | Denis S. Matyukhin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article analyses the current state of the Lublin Triangle with the forum facing a seri- ous challenge of stability and unity for the first time after Russia’s withdrawal from the grain deal. The study focuses on both some statements of the Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian presidents with- in the framework of the Lublin Triangle and a number of trilateral declarations that have been adopted since the establishment of the format on July 28, 2020. The study points out the history of the Lublin Triangle development, as well as the ideological motives that prompted the Polish lead- ership to take the initiative to convene the forum. The article underlines that the Lublin Triangle status against the backdrop of the armed conflict in Ukraine was noticeably undermined after the Black Sea Grain Initiative failure, which, among other things, has already escalated tensions be- tween Poland and Ukraine. The study concludes that the grain deal cancellation exposed the long- standing contradictions of the Lublin Triangle members, demonstrated Poland’s unwillingness to harm its own economic interests for the sake of supporting Ukraine and proved that the forum transformation into a unified and mutually beneficial union from a political, financial and cultural point of view is unlikely even in the distant future. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T17:09:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-68c719a2c63f49ed970729378695fe25 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2618-7914 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T17:09:26Z |
| publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
| publisher | Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН |
| spelling | doaj.art-68c719a2c63f49ed970729378695fe252024-03-28T13:38:07ZrusInstitute of Europe Russian Academy of SciencesНаучно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН2618-79142024-02-01ECONOMICS AND FINANCE1 (37)798910.15211/vestnikieran120247989PROSPECTS OF THE LUBLIN TRIANGLE AFTER THE GRAIN DEAL FAILUREDenis S. Matyukhin0Lev N. Klepatskii1Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RussiaDiplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RussiaThe article analyses the current state of the Lublin Triangle with the forum facing a seri- ous challenge of stability and unity for the first time after Russia’s withdrawal from the grain deal. The study focuses on both some statements of the Polish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian presidents with- in the framework of the Lublin Triangle and a number of trilateral declarations that have been adopted since the establishment of the format on July 28, 2020. The study points out the history of the Lublin Triangle development, as well as the ideological motives that prompted the Polish lead- ership to take the initiative to convene the forum. The article underlines that the Lublin Triangle status against the backdrop of the armed conflict in Ukraine was noticeably undermined after the Black Sea Grain Initiative failure, which, among other things, has already escalated tensions be- tween Poland and Ukraine. The study concludes that the grain deal cancellation exposed the long- standing contradictions of the Lublin Triangle members, demonstrated Poland’s unwillingness to harm its own economic interests for the sake of supporting Ukraine and proved that the forum transformation into a unified and mutually beneficial union from a political, financial and cultural point of view is unlikely even in the distant future.http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/1-2024/Matyukhin12024.pdflublin trianglepolandlithuaniaukrainegrain dealrussiaintermariumjerzy giedroyc – juliusz mieroszewski doctrineeuropean commission |
| spellingShingle | Denis S. Matyukhin Lev N. Klepatskii PROSPECTS OF THE LUBLIN TRIANGLE AFTER THE GRAIN DEAL FAILURE Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН lublin triangle poland lithuania ukraine grain deal russia intermarium jerzy giedroyc – juliusz mieroszewski doctrine european commission |
| title | PROSPECTS OF THE LUBLIN TRIANGLE AFTER THE GRAIN DEAL FAILURE |
| title_full | PROSPECTS OF THE LUBLIN TRIANGLE AFTER THE GRAIN DEAL FAILURE |
| title_fullStr | PROSPECTS OF THE LUBLIN TRIANGLE AFTER THE GRAIN DEAL FAILURE |
| title_full_unstemmed | PROSPECTS OF THE LUBLIN TRIANGLE AFTER THE GRAIN DEAL FAILURE |
| title_short | PROSPECTS OF THE LUBLIN TRIANGLE AFTER THE GRAIN DEAL FAILURE |
| title_sort | prospects of the lublin triangle after the grain deal failure |
| topic | lublin triangle poland lithuania ukraine grain deal russia intermarium jerzy giedroyc – juliusz mieroszewski doctrine european commission |
| url | http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/1-2024/Matyukhin12024.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT denissmatyukhin prospectsofthelublintriangleafterthegraindealfailure AT levnklepatskii prospectsofthelublintriangleafterthegraindealfailure |