Scope and quality of Cochrane reviews of nutrition interventions: a cross-sectional study
Abstract Background All countries face significant challenges from complex manifestations of malnutrition, which affects one in three people globally. Systematic reviews provide ready-to-use syntheses of quality-appraised evidence to inform decision-making for actions. To enhance the utility and qua...
Main Authors: | Celeste E. Naude, Solange Durao, Abigail Harper, Jimmy Volmink |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Nutrition Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12937-017-0244-7 |
Similar Items
-
Cochrane Africa: a network of evidence-informed health-care decision making across sub-saharan Africa
by: Lawrence Mbuagbaw, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
by: Maximilian Siebert, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Experiences of Using Cochrane Systematic Reviews by Local HTA Units
by: Thomas G. Poder, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
by: Andrija Babic, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)