| Summary: | The research addressed studying the issue of complex consensus among fundamentalists and jurists, identifying the definition of this fundamentalist term linguistically and terminologically, and related terms or similar models. This was followed by a study of the validity of the complex consensus and an explanation of its relationship to some fundamentalist issues, such as the issue of fabrication and others, which the fundamentalists stipulated about its link to the complex consensus. Then, the research revealed some jurisprudential effects and applications on the problematic consensus. This is done by combining the methods of description and induction through observation, as some fundamentalists have stated in reasoning by complex consensus or some of its forms in jurisprudential applications. The research presented an introduction of several sections, the necessary requirements for each topic, a conclusion that included the most important results and recommendations, and an index of sources and references.
|
|---|