Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways

Non-technical summary Models are increasingly used to inform the transformation of human–Earth systems towards a sustainable future, aligned with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). We argue that a greater diversity of models ought to be used for sustainability analysis to better address compl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Enayat A. Moallemi, Lei Gao, Sibel Eker, Brett A. Bryan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-01-01
Series:Global Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059479822000072/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811155679817236480
author Enayat A. Moallemi
Lei Gao
Sibel Eker
Brett A. Bryan
author_facet Enayat A. Moallemi
Lei Gao
Sibel Eker
Brett A. Bryan
author_sort Enayat A. Moallemi
collection DOAJ
description Non-technical summary Models are increasingly used to inform the transformation of human–Earth systems towards a sustainable future, aligned with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). We argue that a greater diversity of models ought to be used for sustainability analysis to better address complexity and uncertainty. We articulate the steps to model global change socioeconomic and climatic scenarios with new models. Through these steps, we generate new scenario projections using a human–Earth system dynamics model. Our modelling brings new insights about the sensitivity of sustainability trends to future uncertainty and their alignment with or divergence from previous model-based scenario projections. Technical summary The future uncertainty and complexity of alternative socioeconomic and climatic scenarios challenge the model-based analysis of sustainable development. Obtaining robust insights requires a systematic processing of uncertainty and complexity not only in input assumptions, but also in the diversity of model structures that simulates the multisectoral dynamics of human and Earth system interactions. Here, we implement the global change scenarios, that is, the shared socioeconomic pathways and the representative concentration pathways, in a feedback-rich, integrated assessment model (IAM) of human–Earth system dynamics, called FeliX, to serve two aims: (1) to provide modellers with well-defined steps for the adoption of established scenarios in new IAMs and (2) to explore the impacts of model uncertainty and its structural complexity on the projection of these scenarios for sustainable development. Our modelling shows internally consistent scenario storylines across sectors, yet with quantitatively different realisations of these scenarios compared to other IAMs due to the new model's structural complexity. The results highlight the importance of enumerating global change scenarios and their uncertainty exploration with a diversity of models of different input assumptions and structures to capture a wider variety of future possibilities and sustainability indicators. Social media summary New study highlights the importance of global change scenario analysis with new, SDG-focused IAMs.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:38:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-68f06a594a4e4807be6f36a5483c3917
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-4798
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:38:36Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Global Sustainability
spelling doaj.art-68f06a594a4e4807be6f36a5483c39172023-03-09T12:43:43ZengCambridge University PressGlobal Sustainability2059-47982022-01-01510.1017/sus.2022.7Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathwaysEnayat A. Moallemi0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8346-4043Lei Gao1Sibel Eker2Brett A. Bryan3Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, AustraliaThe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Waite Campus, Urrbrae, AustraliaNijmegen School of Management, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, AustriaCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, AustraliaNon-technical summary Models are increasingly used to inform the transformation of human–Earth systems towards a sustainable future, aligned with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). We argue that a greater diversity of models ought to be used for sustainability analysis to better address complexity and uncertainty. We articulate the steps to model global change socioeconomic and climatic scenarios with new models. Through these steps, we generate new scenario projections using a human–Earth system dynamics model. Our modelling brings new insights about the sensitivity of sustainability trends to future uncertainty and their alignment with or divergence from previous model-based scenario projections. Technical summary The future uncertainty and complexity of alternative socioeconomic and climatic scenarios challenge the model-based analysis of sustainable development. Obtaining robust insights requires a systematic processing of uncertainty and complexity not only in input assumptions, but also in the diversity of model structures that simulates the multisectoral dynamics of human and Earth system interactions. Here, we implement the global change scenarios, that is, the shared socioeconomic pathways and the representative concentration pathways, in a feedback-rich, integrated assessment model (IAM) of human–Earth system dynamics, called FeliX, to serve two aims: (1) to provide modellers with well-defined steps for the adoption of established scenarios in new IAMs and (2) to explore the impacts of model uncertainty and its structural complexity on the projection of these scenarios for sustainable development. Our modelling shows internally consistent scenario storylines across sectors, yet with quantitatively different realisations of these scenarios compared to other IAMs due to the new model's structural complexity. The results highlight the importance of enumerating global change scenarios and their uncertainty exploration with a diversity of models of different input assumptions and structures to capture a wider variety of future possibilities and sustainability indicators. Social media summary New study highlights the importance of global change scenario analysis with new, SDG-focused IAMs. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059479822000072/type/journal_articleintegrated assessmentscenarioSDGssustainabilitysystem dynamicsuncertainty
spellingShingle Enayat A. Moallemi
Lei Gao
Sibel Eker
Brett A. Bryan
Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways
Global Sustainability
integrated assessment
scenario
SDGs
sustainability
system dynamics
uncertainty
title Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways
title_full Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways
title_fullStr Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways
title_full_unstemmed Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways
title_short Diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways
title_sort diversifying models for analysing global change scenarios and sustainability pathways
topic integrated assessment
scenario
SDGs
sustainability
system dynamics
uncertainty
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059479822000072/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT enayatamoallemi diversifyingmodelsforanalysingglobalchangescenariosandsustainabilitypathways
AT leigao diversifyingmodelsforanalysingglobalchangescenariosandsustainabilitypathways
AT sibeleker diversifyingmodelsforanalysingglobalchangescenariosandsustainabilitypathways
AT brettabryan diversifyingmodelsforanalysingglobalchangescenariosandsustainabilitypathways