‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation

Abstract Introduction Our aim is to explore the ways in which a patient and a general practitioner (GP) negotiate knowledge claims stemming from different epistemic domains while dealing with a mismatch between experiential and biomedical knowledge during the clinical consultation. We interpret thei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olaug S. Lian, Sarah Nettleton, Huw Grange, Christopher Dowrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-02-01
Series:Health Expectations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13666
_version_ 1797946571949604864
author Olaug S. Lian
Sarah Nettleton
Huw Grange
Christopher Dowrick
author_facet Olaug S. Lian
Sarah Nettleton
Huw Grange
Christopher Dowrick
author_sort Olaug S. Lian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Our aim is to explore the ways in which a patient and a general practitioner (GP) negotiate knowledge claims stemming from different epistemic domains while dealing with a mismatch between experiential and biomedical knowledge during the clinical consultation. We interpret their interaction in relation to the sociocultural context in which their negotiation is embedded and identify factors facilitating their successful negotiation (a medical error is avoided). Methods Based on a narrative analysis of a verbatim transcript of a complete naturally occurring primary care consultation, we explore the moment‐to‐moment unfolding of talk between the patient and the GP (two women). Findings The patient experiences symptoms of what she interprets as a thyroid condition, and indirectly asks for medication. She presents her case by drawing on experiential knowledge (‘it feels like my metabolism has shut down’) and biomedical knowledge (while suggesting a diagnosis and a diagnostic test). The GP informs her that her thyroid blood tests are normal and uses biomedical knowledge to explain why she turns down the patient's request. This stages a potential conflict between the patient's embodied experiential knowledge and the doctor's biomedical knowledge. However, during their encounter, the patient and the GP manage to co‐construct the patient's illness story and make shared decisions about further actions. Conclusion The transition from potential conflict to consensus is a result of the mutual efforts of two parties: a patient who persistently claims experiential as well as biomedical knowledge while at the same time deferring to the GP's professional knowledge, and a GP who maintains her epistemic authority while also acknowledging the patient's experiential and biomedical knowledge. Patient and Public Contribution Our empirical data are sourced from a data archive and patients were not involved in the design or conduct of the study, but our study is based on a naturally occurring clinical consultation with a patient.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T21:14:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-68f9e4ffbdd94f229be9f561b19e2e1a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1369-6513
1369-7625
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T21:14:11Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Expectations
spelling doaj.art-68f9e4ffbdd94f229be9f561b19e2e1a2023-01-20T13:33:07ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252023-02-0126136637510.1111/hex.13666‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultationOlaug S. Lian0Sarah Nettleton1Huw Grange2Christopher Dowrick3Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences UiT—The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø NorwayDepartment of Sociology University of York York UKDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences UiT—The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø NorwayDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health University of Liverpool Liverpool UKAbstract Introduction Our aim is to explore the ways in which a patient and a general practitioner (GP) negotiate knowledge claims stemming from different epistemic domains while dealing with a mismatch between experiential and biomedical knowledge during the clinical consultation. We interpret their interaction in relation to the sociocultural context in which their negotiation is embedded and identify factors facilitating their successful negotiation (a medical error is avoided). Methods Based on a narrative analysis of a verbatim transcript of a complete naturally occurring primary care consultation, we explore the moment‐to‐moment unfolding of talk between the patient and the GP (two women). Findings The patient experiences symptoms of what she interprets as a thyroid condition, and indirectly asks for medication. She presents her case by drawing on experiential knowledge (‘it feels like my metabolism has shut down’) and biomedical knowledge (while suggesting a diagnosis and a diagnostic test). The GP informs her that her thyroid blood tests are normal and uses biomedical knowledge to explain why she turns down the patient's request. This stages a potential conflict between the patient's embodied experiential knowledge and the doctor's biomedical knowledge. However, during their encounter, the patient and the GP manage to co‐construct the patient's illness story and make shared decisions about further actions. Conclusion The transition from potential conflict to consensus is a result of the mutual efforts of two parties: a patient who persistently claims experiential as well as biomedical knowledge while at the same time deferring to the GP's professional knowledge, and a GP who maintains her epistemic authority while also acknowledging the patient's experiential and biomedical knowledge. Patient and Public Contribution Our empirical data are sourced from a data archive and patients were not involved in the design or conduct of the study, but our study is based on a naturally occurring clinical consultation with a patient.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13666epistemic positionepistemic stancegeneral practicenarrative analysispatient experienceshared decision‐making
spellingShingle Olaug S. Lian
Sarah Nettleton
Huw Grange
Christopher Dowrick
‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation
Health Expectations
epistemic position
epistemic stance
general practice
narrative analysis
patient experience
shared decision‐making
title ‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation
title_full ‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation
title_fullStr ‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation
title_full_unstemmed ‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation
title_short ‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation
title_sort it feels like my metabolism has shut down negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation
topic epistemic position
epistemic stance
general practice
narrative analysis
patient experience
shared decision‐making
url https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13666
work_keys_str_mv AT olaugslian itfeelslikemymetabolismhasshutdownnegotiatinginteractionalrolesandepistemicpositionsinaprimarycareconsultation
AT sarahnettleton itfeelslikemymetabolismhasshutdownnegotiatinginteractionalrolesandepistemicpositionsinaprimarycareconsultation
AT huwgrange itfeelslikemymetabolismhasshutdownnegotiatinginteractionalrolesandepistemicpositionsinaprimarycareconsultation
AT christopherdowrick itfeelslikemymetabolismhasshutdownnegotiatinginteractionalrolesandepistemicpositionsinaprimarycareconsultation