Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-ends

GTP-tubulin is preferentially incorporated at growing microtubule ends, but the biochemical mechanism by which the bound nucleotide regulates the strength of tubulin:tubulin interactions is debated. The ‘self-acting’ (cis) model posits that the nucleotide (GTP or GDP) bound to a particular tubulin d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren A McCormick, Joseph M Cleary, William O Hancock, Luke M Rice
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2024-01-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/89231
_version_ 1827290223911895040
author Lauren A McCormick
Joseph M Cleary
William O Hancock
Luke M Rice
author_facet Lauren A McCormick
Joseph M Cleary
William O Hancock
Luke M Rice
author_sort Lauren A McCormick
collection DOAJ
description GTP-tubulin is preferentially incorporated at growing microtubule ends, but the biochemical mechanism by which the bound nucleotide regulates the strength of tubulin:tubulin interactions is debated. The ‘self-acting’ (cis) model posits that the nucleotide (GTP or GDP) bound to a particular tubulin dictates how strongly that tubulin interacts, whereas the ‘interface-acting’ (trans) model posits that the nucleotide at the interface of two tubulin dimers is the determinant. We identified a testable difference between these mechanisms using mixed nucleotide simulations of microtubule elongation: with a self-acting nucleotide, plus- and minus-end growth rates decreased in the same proportion to the amount of GDP-tubulin, whereas with interface-acting nucleotide, plus-end growth rates decreased disproportionately. We then experimentally measured plus- and minus-end elongation rates in mixed nucleotides and observed a disproportionate effect of GDP-tubulin on plus-end growth rates. Simulations of microtubule growth were consistent with GDP-tubulin binding at and ‘poisoning’ plus-ends but not at minus-ends. Quantitative agreement between simulations and experiments required nucleotide exchange at terminal plus-end subunits to mitigate the poisoning effect of GDP-tubulin there. Our results indicate that the interfacial nucleotide determines tubulin:tubulin interaction strength, thereby settling a longstanding debate over the effect of nucleotide state on microtubule dynamics.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:25:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-68fe5f499f9a438da74d307b30dd5768
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T12:12:29Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-68fe5f499f9a438da74d307b30dd57682024-04-08T11:12:06ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2024-01-011210.7554/eLife.89231Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-endsLauren A McCormick0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9164-0932Joseph M Cleary1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-2543William O Hancock2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-8755Luke M Rice3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-3307Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, United StatesDepartment of Biophysics and Biochemistry, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United StatesGTP-tubulin is preferentially incorporated at growing microtubule ends, but the biochemical mechanism by which the bound nucleotide regulates the strength of tubulin:tubulin interactions is debated. The ‘self-acting’ (cis) model posits that the nucleotide (GTP or GDP) bound to a particular tubulin dictates how strongly that tubulin interacts, whereas the ‘interface-acting’ (trans) model posits that the nucleotide at the interface of two tubulin dimers is the determinant. We identified a testable difference between these mechanisms using mixed nucleotide simulations of microtubule elongation: with a self-acting nucleotide, plus- and minus-end growth rates decreased in the same proportion to the amount of GDP-tubulin, whereas with interface-acting nucleotide, plus-end growth rates decreased disproportionately. We then experimentally measured plus- and minus-end elongation rates in mixed nucleotides and observed a disproportionate effect of GDP-tubulin on plus-end growth rates. Simulations of microtubule growth were consistent with GDP-tubulin binding at and ‘poisoning’ plus-ends but not at minus-ends. Quantitative agreement between simulations and experiments required nucleotide exchange at terminal plus-end subunits to mitigate the poisoning effect of GDP-tubulin there. Our results indicate that the interfacial nucleotide determines tubulin:tubulin interaction strength, thereby settling a longstanding debate over the effect of nucleotide state on microtubule dynamics.https://elifesciences.org/articles/89231microtubule dynamicsmixed nucleotidekinetic simulations
spellingShingle Lauren A McCormick
Joseph M Cleary
William O Hancock
Luke M Rice
Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-ends
eLife
microtubule dynamics
mixed nucleotide
kinetic simulations
title Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-ends
title_full Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-ends
title_fullStr Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-ends
title_full_unstemmed Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-ends
title_short Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-ends
title_sort interface acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus and minus ends
topic microtubule dynamics
mixed nucleotide
kinetic simulations
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/89231
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenamccormick interfaceactingnucleotidecontrolspolymerizationdynamicsatmicrotubuleplusandminusends
AT josephmcleary interfaceactingnucleotidecontrolspolymerizationdynamicsatmicrotubuleplusandminusends
AT williamohancock interfaceactingnucleotidecontrolspolymerizationdynamicsatmicrotubuleplusandminusends
AT lukemrice interfaceactingnucleotidecontrolspolymerizationdynamicsatmicrotubuleplusandminusends