Comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis: A randomized control trial

Background: Oral malodor is a major periodontal complaint, but the best method for assessing the halitosis grade is still undefined. The primary objective of the study was to detect the halitosis grade in the exhaled breath using the three distinct techniques and to compare the readings with differe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junaid Mushtaq Veeray, K K Gupta, Sweta Soni, Divya Kothari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2023;volume=27;issue=4;spage=422;epage=427;aulast=Veeray
_version_ 1827861918771052544
author Junaid Mushtaq Veeray
K K Gupta
Sweta Soni
Divya Kothari
author_facet Junaid Mushtaq Veeray
K K Gupta
Sweta Soni
Divya Kothari
author_sort Junaid Mushtaq Veeray
collection DOAJ
description Background: Oral malodor is a major periodontal complaint, but the best method for assessing the halitosis grade is still undefined. The primary objective of the study was to detect the halitosis grade in the exhaled breath using the three distinct techniques and to compare the readings with different clinical indices to find out the best method of halitosis grading. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 patients with chronic periodontitis having oral malodor were included in the study. The subjective assessment of the exhaled breath (halitosis grading) was done by three different methods; using a handheld portable Tanita FitScan sulfide monitor, by Halitox toxin assay, and by organoleptic (Sniff test) method. The findings were then compared with the clinical parameters of poor oral hygiene like plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), gingival bleeding index (BI), and pocket depth (PD) to detect the best method of halitosis grading. Results: The mean age of the patients included was 38.23 ± 8.83 (mean ± standard deviation) years. The median value of halitosis grading as obtained by Tanita FitScan was 3.0 (95% confidence interval as 2 and 4) which was then compared with clinical indices (PI, GI, BI, and PD) and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.05), whereas the other two techniques of halitosis grading gave insignificant results. Conclusion: The results confirmed that the halitosis grading done using Tanita FitScan sulfide monitor is more appropriate with respect to clinical indices when compared with the other two techniques.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:45:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-690352cbc574459693864e71eb544f2e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-124X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:45:03Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
spelling doaj.art-690352cbc574459693864e71eb544f2e2023-08-23T09:26:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology0972-124X2023-01-0127442242710.4103/jisp.jisp_197_22Comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis: A randomized control trialJunaid Mushtaq VeerayK K GuptaSweta SoniDivya KothariBackground: Oral malodor is a major periodontal complaint, but the best method for assessing the halitosis grade is still undefined. The primary objective of the study was to detect the halitosis grade in the exhaled breath using the three distinct techniques and to compare the readings with different clinical indices to find out the best method of halitosis grading. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 patients with chronic periodontitis having oral malodor were included in the study. The subjective assessment of the exhaled breath (halitosis grading) was done by three different methods; using a handheld portable Tanita FitScan sulfide monitor, by Halitox toxin assay, and by organoleptic (Sniff test) method. The findings were then compared with the clinical parameters of poor oral hygiene like plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), gingival bleeding index (BI), and pocket depth (PD) to detect the best method of halitosis grading. Results: The mean age of the patients included was 38.23 ± 8.83 (mean ± standard deviation) years. The median value of halitosis grading as obtained by Tanita FitScan was 3.0 (95% confidence interval as 2 and 4) which was then compared with clinical indices (PI, GI, BI, and PD) and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.05), whereas the other two techniques of halitosis grading gave insignificant results. Conclusion: The results confirmed that the halitosis grading done using Tanita FitScan sulfide monitor is more appropriate with respect to clinical indices when compared with the other two techniques.http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2023;volume=27;issue=4;spage=422;epage=427;aulast=Veerayanaerobic microflorachronic periodontitishalitosishandheld monitor
spellingShingle Junaid Mushtaq Veeray
K K Gupta
Sweta Soni
Divya Kothari
Comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis: A randomized control trial
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
anaerobic microflora
chronic periodontitis
halitosis
handheld monitor
title Comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis: A randomized control trial
title_full Comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis: A randomized control trial
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis: A randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis: A randomized control trial
title_short Comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis: A randomized control trial
title_sort comparison of clinical indices with halitosis grading in chronic periodontitis a randomized control trial
topic anaerobic microflora
chronic periodontitis
halitosis
handheld monitor
url http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2023;volume=27;issue=4;spage=422;epage=427;aulast=Veeray
work_keys_str_mv AT junaidmushtaqveeray comparisonofclinicalindiceswithhalitosisgradinginchronicperiodontitisarandomizedcontroltrial
AT kkgupta comparisonofclinicalindiceswithhalitosisgradinginchronicperiodontitisarandomizedcontroltrial
AT swetasoni comparisonofclinicalindiceswithhalitosisgradinginchronicperiodontitisarandomizedcontroltrial
AT divyakothari comparisonofclinicalindiceswithhalitosisgradinginchronicperiodontitisarandomizedcontroltrial