Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns

Twenty-seven methods of estimating vertical ground reaction force first peak, loading rate, second peak, average, and/or time series from a single wearable accelerometer worn on the shank or approximate center of mass during running were compared. Force estimation errors were quantified for 74 parti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dovin Kiernan, Brandon Ng, David A. Hawkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/21/8719
_version_ 1797631335996588032
author Dovin Kiernan
Brandon Ng
David A. Hawkins
author_facet Dovin Kiernan
Brandon Ng
David A. Hawkins
author_sort Dovin Kiernan
collection DOAJ
description Twenty-seven methods of estimating vertical ground reaction force first peak, loading rate, second peak, average, and/or time series from a single wearable accelerometer worn on the shank or approximate center of mass during running were compared. Force estimation errors were quantified for 74 participants across different running surfaces, speeds, and foot strike angles and biases, repeatability coefficients, and limits of agreement were modeled with linear mixed effects to quantify the accuracy, reliability, and precision. Several methods accurately and reliably estimated the first peak and loading rate, however, none could do so precisely (the limits of agreement exceeded ±65% of target values). Thus, we do not recommend first peak or loading rate estimation from accelerometers with the methods currently available. In contrast, the second peak, average, and time series could all be estimated accurately, reliably, and precisely with several different methods. Of these, we recommend the ‘Pogson’ methods due to their accuracy, reliability, and precision as well as their stability across surfaces, speeds, and foot strike angles.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:21:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6908a789eac348ee891699e9f5f65da7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:21:23Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-6908a789eac348ee891699e9f5f65da72023-11-10T15:11:49ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-10-012321871910.3390/s23218719Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike PatternsDovin Kiernan0Brandon Ng1David A. Hawkins2Biomedical Engineering Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USABiomedical Engineering Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USATwenty-seven methods of estimating vertical ground reaction force first peak, loading rate, second peak, average, and/or time series from a single wearable accelerometer worn on the shank or approximate center of mass during running were compared. Force estimation errors were quantified for 74 participants across different running surfaces, speeds, and foot strike angles and biases, repeatability coefficients, and limits of agreement were modeled with linear mixed effects to quantify the accuracy, reliability, and precision. Several methods accurately and reliably estimated the first peak and loading rate, however, none could do so precisely (the limits of agreement exceeded ±65% of target values). Thus, we do not recommend first peak or loading rate estimation from accelerometers with the methods currently available. In contrast, the second peak, average, and time series could all be estimated accurately, reliably, and precisely with several different methods. Of these, we recommend the ‘Pogson’ methods due to their accuracy, reliability, and precision as well as their stability across surfaces, speeds, and foot strike angles.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/21/8719wearables inertial measurement units (IMUs)in-field kineticsover-ground gait biomechanicsmachine learning
spellingShingle Dovin Kiernan
Brandon Ng
David A. Hawkins
Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns
Sensors
wearables inertial measurement units (IMUs)
in-field kinetics
over-ground gait biomechanics
machine learning
title Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns
title_full Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns
title_fullStr Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns
title_full_unstemmed Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns
title_short Acceleration-Based Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces during Running: A Comparison of Methods across Running Speeds, Surfaces, and Foot Strike Patterns
title_sort acceleration based estimation of vertical ground reaction forces during running a comparison of methods across running speeds surfaces and foot strike patterns
topic wearables inertial measurement units (IMUs)
in-field kinetics
over-ground gait biomechanics
machine learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/21/8719
work_keys_str_mv AT dovinkiernan accelerationbasedestimationofverticalgroundreactionforcesduringrunningacomparisonofmethodsacrossrunningspeedssurfacesandfootstrikepatterns
AT brandonng accelerationbasedestimationofverticalgroundreactionforcesduringrunningacomparisonofmethodsacrossrunningspeedssurfacesandfootstrikepatterns
AT davidahawkins accelerationbasedestimationofverticalgroundreactionforcesduringrunningacomparisonofmethodsacrossrunningspeedssurfacesandfootstrikepatterns