Medical specialists’ attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination: a qualitative study in Armenia
Abstract Background Childhood vaccination rates in Armenia are high. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that some health workers may advise against vaccination. The extent and reasons behind this are unknown. This study used the World Health Organization Tailoring Immunization Programmes approach...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | BMC Pediatrics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03687-3 |
| _version_ | 1811197957778702336 |
|---|---|
| author | Cath Jackson Siff Malue Nielsen Brigida Simonyan Marine Kirakosyan Marine Hovhannisyan Gayane Sahakyan Katrine Bach Habersaat |
| author_facet | Cath Jackson Siff Malue Nielsen Brigida Simonyan Marine Kirakosyan Marine Hovhannisyan Gayane Sahakyan Katrine Bach Habersaat |
| author_sort | Cath Jackson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Childhood vaccination rates in Armenia are high. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that some health workers may advise against vaccination. The extent and reasons behind this are unknown. This study used the World Health Organization Tailoring Immunization Programmes approach to investigate medical specialists’ vaccination practices. Methods Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 30 medical specialists (paediatricians, immunologists, neonatologists, neurologists, gynaecologists). Interviews explored their vaccination practices (recommending/administering), knowledge, attitudes and confidence. Data were analysed using the Framework approach and COM (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation) factors. Findings Medical specialists were routinely consulted by parents about vaccination. They engaged in conversations, even if they did not administer vaccinations and lacked expertise. Vaccination recommendation was “selective”, influenced by their own vaccine hesitancy. Doctors administering vaccination used false contraindications to postpone vaccination. Multiple barriers and drivers to positive vaccination practices were evident, with differences between specialists administering/not administering vaccinations. Capability Drivers were knowledge of vaccination, vaccines, and vaccine-preventable diseases; with awareness and use of protocols for adverse events and contraindications (those with a vaccination role). Barriers were a lack of a detailed understanding of vaccination, vaccines, and vaccine-preventable diseases, especially amongst neonatologists and gynaecologists, and for HPV. Poor knowledge of adverse events and mixed knowledge of contraindications was evident, as was low confidence about conversations with parents declining vaccination. Opportunity Drivers were using “official“ guidance and professional information and feeling protected by the Government of Armenia should an adverse event occur. Conversely, barriers were a reliance on media/social media without considering credibility, peers not recommending vaccination, increasing parent demands and not feeling protected by the Government. Motivation Drivers were seeing vaccination as their responsibility (those who administer vaccinations); and generally supporting vaccination. Barriers were vaccine hesitancy, some anti-vaccination sentiments amongst neonatologists and gynaecologists and not seeing vaccination as their role (those who do not administer vaccinations). Conclusions Applying a theory-informed approach allowed us to identify critical issues and possible solutions. High vaccination coverage may disguise underlying issues, e.g. false contraindications. We addressed gaps in the literature, with our geographical focus and study of medical specialists advising parents on vaccination, a widely used practice in this sub-region. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T01:23:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6913410511104f158487bf3956a5a45c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2431 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T01:23:12Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Pediatrics |
| spelling | doaj.art-6913410511104f158487bf3956a5a45c2022-12-22T03:53:43ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312022-10-0122111310.1186/s12887-022-03687-3Medical specialists’ attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination: a qualitative study in ArmeniaCath Jackson0Siff Malue Nielsen1Brigida Simonyan2Marine Kirakosyan3Marine Hovhannisyan4Gayane Sahakyan5Katrine Bach Habersaat6World Health Organization Regional Office for EuropeWorld Health Organization Regional Office for EuropeNational Center for Disease Control and PreventionNational Center for Disease Control and PreventionNational Center for Disease Control and PreventionNational Center for Disease Control and PreventionWorld Health Organization Regional Office for EuropeAbstract Background Childhood vaccination rates in Armenia are high. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that some health workers may advise against vaccination. The extent and reasons behind this are unknown. This study used the World Health Organization Tailoring Immunization Programmes approach to investigate medical specialists’ vaccination practices. Methods Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 30 medical specialists (paediatricians, immunologists, neonatologists, neurologists, gynaecologists). Interviews explored their vaccination practices (recommending/administering), knowledge, attitudes and confidence. Data were analysed using the Framework approach and COM (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation) factors. Findings Medical specialists were routinely consulted by parents about vaccination. They engaged in conversations, even if they did not administer vaccinations and lacked expertise. Vaccination recommendation was “selective”, influenced by their own vaccine hesitancy. Doctors administering vaccination used false contraindications to postpone vaccination. Multiple barriers and drivers to positive vaccination practices were evident, with differences between specialists administering/not administering vaccinations. Capability Drivers were knowledge of vaccination, vaccines, and vaccine-preventable diseases; with awareness and use of protocols for adverse events and contraindications (those with a vaccination role). Barriers were a lack of a detailed understanding of vaccination, vaccines, and vaccine-preventable diseases, especially amongst neonatologists and gynaecologists, and for HPV. Poor knowledge of adverse events and mixed knowledge of contraindications was evident, as was low confidence about conversations with parents declining vaccination. Opportunity Drivers were using “official“ guidance and professional information and feeling protected by the Government of Armenia should an adverse event occur. Conversely, barriers were a reliance on media/social media without considering credibility, peers not recommending vaccination, increasing parent demands and not feeling protected by the Government. Motivation Drivers were seeing vaccination as their responsibility (those who administer vaccinations); and generally supporting vaccination. Barriers were vaccine hesitancy, some anti-vaccination sentiments amongst neonatologists and gynaecologists and not seeing vaccination as their role (those who do not administer vaccinations). Conclusions Applying a theory-informed approach allowed us to identify critical issues and possible solutions. High vaccination coverage may disguise underlying issues, e.g. false contraindications. We addressed gaps in the literature, with our geographical focus and study of medical specialists advising parents on vaccination, a widely used practice in this sub-region.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03687-3VaccinationImmunizationImmunisationHealth workerArmeniaTailoring immunization programmes (TIP) |
| spellingShingle | Cath Jackson Siff Malue Nielsen Brigida Simonyan Marine Kirakosyan Marine Hovhannisyan Gayane Sahakyan Katrine Bach Habersaat Medical specialists’ attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination: a qualitative study in Armenia BMC Pediatrics Vaccination Immunization Immunisation Health worker Armenia Tailoring immunization programmes (TIP) |
| title | Medical specialists’ attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination: a qualitative study in Armenia |
| title_full | Medical specialists’ attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination: a qualitative study in Armenia |
| title_fullStr | Medical specialists’ attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination: a qualitative study in Armenia |
| title_full_unstemmed | Medical specialists’ attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination: a qualitative study in Armenia |
| title_short | Medical specialists’ attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination: a qualitative study in Armenia |
| title_sort | medical specialists attitudes and practices towards childhood vaccination a qualitative study in armenia |
| topic | Vaccination Immunization Immunisation Health worker Armenia Tailoring immunization programmes (TIP) |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03687-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cathjackson medicalspecialistsattitudesandpracticestowardschildhoodvaccinationaqualitativestudyinarmenia AT siffmaluenielsen medicalspecialistsattitudesandpracticestowardschildhoodvaccinationaqualitativestudyinarmenia AT brigidasimonyan medicalspecialistsattitudesandpracticestowardschildhoodvaccinationaqualitativestudyinarmenia AT marinekirakosyan medicalspecialistsattitudesandpracticestowardschildhoodvaccinationaqualitativestudyinarmenia AT marinehovhannisyan medicalspecialistsattitudesandpracticestowardschildhoodvaccinationaqualitativestudyinarmenia AT gayanesahakyan medicalspecialistsattitudesandpracticestowardschildhoodvaccinationaqualitativestudyinarmenia AT katrinebachhabersaat medicalspecialistsattitudesandpracticestowardschildhoodvaccinationaqualitativestudyinarmenia |