Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study
Study DesignRetrospective.PurposeTo report the outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with percutaneous endoscopic decompression, focusing on the results of clinical evaluations.Overview of LiteratureThere are no studies about two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression in the...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Korean Spine Society
2016-04-01
|
| Series: | Asian Spine Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-10-335.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819075633908547584 |
|---|---|
| author | Yingyong Torudom Thitinut Dilokhuttakarn |
| author_facet | Yingyong Torudom Thitinut Dilokhuttakarn |
| author_sort | Yingyong Torudom |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Study DesignRetrospective.PurposeTo report the outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with percutaneous endoscopic decompression, focusing on the results of clinical evaluations.Overview of LiteratureThere are no studies about two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.MethodsMedical and surgical complications were examined and clinical results were analyzed for 30 patients who consecutively underwent two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis were reviewed. The operations were performed by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.ResultsAll patients displayed clinical improvement when were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Macnab criteria. The improvement of VAS and ODI was 8.3±0.7 to 2.3±2.6 and 65.2±13.7 to 24.0±15.5, respectively (both p<0.05). Complications were the same as for open decompression. The most common complication was transient nerve root paresthesia.ConclusionsSurgical decompression with two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression has initial benefits, but long-term studies should pay more attention to the risks of postoperative instability and restenosis as well as the need for re-operation. Further investigations with long-term results are thus required. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T18:28:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-692a4f3eba4540f3a7317fc490f01b0a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1976-1902 1976-7846 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T18:28:31Z |
| publishDate | 2016-04-01 |
| publisher | Korean Spine Society |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Asian Spine Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-692a4f3eba4540f3a7317fc490f01b0a2022-12-21T18:54:20ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462016-04-0110233534210.4184/asj.2016.10.2.33581Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary StudyYingyong Torudom0Thitinut Dilokhuttakarn1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center, Srinakhrinwirot University, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center, Srinakhrinwirot University, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand.Study DesignRetrospective.PurposeTo report the outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with percutaneous endoscopic decompression, focusing on the results of clinical evaluations.Overview of LiteratureThere are no studies about two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.MethodsMedical and surgical complications were examined and clinical results were analyzed for 30 patients who consecutively underwent two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis were reviewed. The operations were performed by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.ResultsAll patients displayed clinical improvement when were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Macnab criteria. The improvement of VAS and ODI was 8.3±0.7 to 2.3±2.6 and 65.2±13.7 to 24.0±15.5, respectively (both p<0.05). Complications were the same as for open decompression. The most common complication was transient nerve root paresthesia.ConclusionsSurgical decompression with two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression has initial benefits, but long-term studies should pay more attention to the risks of postoperative instability and restenosis as well as the need for re-operation. Further investigations with long-term results are thus required.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-10-335.pdfLumbar spineSpinal stenosisPercutaneous endoscopic decompression |
| spellingShingle | Yingyong Torudom Thitinut Dilokhuttakarn Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study Asian Spine Journal Lumbar spine Spinal stenosis Percutaneous endoscopic decompression |
| title | Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study |
| title_full | Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study |
| title_fullStr | Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study |
| title_short | Two Portal Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Study |
| title_sort | two portal percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis preliminary study |
| topic | Lumbar spine Spinal stenosis Percutaneous endoscopic decompression |
| url | http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-10-335.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yingyongtorudom twoportalpercutaneousendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarspinalstenosispreliminarystudy AT thitinutdilokhuttakarn twoportalpercutaneousendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarspinalstenosispreliminarystudy |