Strange loops: Producing history in financial times
In this rejoinder, I discuss three fundamental deadlocks raised by contributors to this forum. These relate to the status of historical discourse, financial market logics, and above all the figure of the ‘strange loop’, which I put forwa...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Finance and Society |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059599900000947/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1827313534117085184 |
---|---|
author | Amin Samman |
author_facet | Amin Samman |
author_sort | Amin Samman |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this rejoinder, I discuss three fundamental deadlocks raised by contributors
to this forum. These relate to the status of historical discourse, financial
market logics, and above all the figure of the ‘strange loop’, which I put
forward as a means of reorienting historical thought. I also offer some
preliminary remarks on why History in Financial Times departs from conventional
forms of historicism in political economy, as well as a further set of
reflections on the contemporaneity of the book's argumentation. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T22:11:27Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-692da0b5d7f7485ea93480bd282a8a32 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2059-5999 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T22:11:27Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Finance and Society |
spelling | doaj.art-692da0b5d7f7485ea93480bd282a8a322024-03-20T08:20:12ZengCambridge University PressFinance and Society2059-59992020-01-01614815610.2218/finsoc.v6i2.5276Strange loops: Producing history in financial timesAmin Samman0City, University of London, UKIn this rejoinder, I discuss three fundamental deadlocks raised by contributors to this forum. These relate to the status of historical discourse, financial market logics, and above all the figure of the ‘strange loop’, which I put forward as a means of reorienting historical thought. I also offer some preliminary remarks on why History in Financial Times departs from conventional forms of historicism in political economy, as well as a further set of reflections on the contemporaneity of the book's argumentation.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059599900000947/type/journal_article |
spellingShingle | Amin Samman Strange loops: Producing history in financial times Finance and Society |
title | Strange loops: Producing history in financial times |
title_full | Strange loops: Producing history in financial times |
title_fullStr | Strange loops: Producing history in financial times |
title_full_unstemmed | Strange loops: Producing history in financial times |
title_short | Strange loops: Producing history in financial times |
title_sort | strange loops producing history in financial times |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059599900000947/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aminsamman strangeloopsproducinghistoryinfinancialtimes |