Feeding Management Strategies to Mitigate Methane and Improve Production Efficiency in Feedlot Cattle

Mitigation of greenhouse gases and decreasing nutrient excretion have become increasingly important goals for the beef cattle industry. Because feed intake is a major driver of enteric CH<sub>4</sub> production and nutrient excretion, feeding management systems could be important mitigat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael L. Galyean, Kristin E. Hales
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/758
_version_ 1827759078428901376
author Michael L. Galyean
Kristin E. Hales
author_facet Michael L. Galyean
Kristin E. Hales
author_sort Michael L. Galyean
collection DOAJ
description Mitigation of greenhouse gases and decreasing nutrient excretion have become increasingly important goals for the beef cattle industry. Because feed intake is a major driver of enteric CH<sub>4</sub> production and nutrient excretion, feeding management systems could be important mitigation tools. Programmed feeding uses net energy equations to determine the feed required to yield a specific rate of gain, whereas restricted feeding typically involves decreasing intake relative to the expected or observed ad libitum intake. In the context of growing/finishing systems typical of those in the United States and Western Canada, experimental results with programmed and restricted feeding have often shown decreased overall feed intake and increased gain efficiency relative to ad libitum feeding, but too much restriction can negatively affect harvest weight and associated carcass quality. Slick feed bunk management is a time-based restriction that limits day-to-day variation in feed deliveries, but the effects on intake and performance are not well defined. Simulations to estimate enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emission and nitrogen excretion indicated that programmed feeding of a high-grain diet could appreciably decrease CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and nitrogen excretion compared with traditional growing programs based on high-forage diets. For feedlot finishing, programming gain for a portion of the feeding period will decrease CH<sub>4</sub> emission and N excretion only if cattle perform better than expected during the programmed phase or if compensatory growth occurs when cattle are transitioned to ad libitum feeding. Optimal approaches to implement programmed or restricted feeding that will yield increased efficiency should be the subject of future research in this area.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:16:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-693d237494ca4085a5e5b76b7c2a8c98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:16:01Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-693d237494ca4085a5e5b76b7c2a8c982023-11-16T18:41:11ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-02-0113475810.3390/ani13040758Feeding Management Strategies to Mitigate Methane and Improve Production Efficiency in Feedlot CattleMichael L. Galyean0Kristin E. Hales1Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USADepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAMitigation of greenhouse gases and decreasing nutrient excretion have become increasingly important goals for the beef cattle industry. Because feed intake is a major driver of enteric CH<sub>4</sub> production and nutrient excretion, feeding management systems could be important mitigation tools. Programmed feeding uses net energy equations to determine the feed required to yield a specific rate of gain, whereas restricted feeding typically involves decreasing intake relative to the expected or observed ad libitum intake. In the context of growing/finishing systems typical of those in the United States and Western Canada, experimental results with programmed and restricted feeding have often shown decreased overall feed intake and increased gain efficiency relative to ad libitum feeding, but too much restriction can negatively affect harvest weight and associated carcass quality. Slick feed bunk management is a time-based restriction that limits day-to-day variation in feed deliveries, but the effects on intake and performance are not well defined. Simulations to estimate enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emission and nitrogen excretion indicated that programmed feeding of a high-grain diet could appreciably decrease CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and nitrogen excretion compared with traditional growing programs based on high-forage diets. For feedlot finishing, programming gain for a portion of the feeding period will decrease CH<sub>4</sub> emission and N excretion only if cattle perform better than expected during the programmed phase or if compensatory growth occurs when cattle are transitioned to ad libitum feeding. Optimal approaches to implement programmed or restricted feeding that will yield increased efficiency should be the subject of future research in this area.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/758beef cattlemethane predictionfeeding management systems
spellingShingle Michael L. Galyean
Kristin E. Hales
Feeding Management Strategies to Mitigate Methane and Improve Production Efficiency in Feedlot Cattle
Animals
beef cattle
methane prediction
feeding management systems
title Feeding Management Strategies to Mitigate Methane and Improve Production Efficiency in Feedlot Cattle
title_full Feeding Management Strategies to Mitigate Methane and Improve Production Efficiency in Feedlot Cattle
title_fullStr Feeding Management Strategies to Mitigate Methane and Improve Production Efficiency in Feedlot Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Feeding Management Strategies to Mitigate Methane and Improve Production Efficiency in Feedlot Cattle
title_short Feeding Management Strategies to Mitigate Methane and Improve Production Efficiency in Feedlot Cattle
title_sort feeding management strategies to mitigate methane and improve production efficiency in feedlot cattle
topic beef cattle
methane prediction
feeding management systems
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/758
work_keys_str_mv AT michaellgalyean feedingmanagementstrategiestomitigatemethaneandimproveproductionefficiencyinfeedlotcattle
AT kristinehales feedingmanagementstrategiestomitigatemethaneandimproveproductionefficiencyinfeedlotcattle