Risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy

Objective To stratify patients with bladder cancer into homogeneous risk groups according to statistically significant differences found in PFS (progression-free survival). To identify those patients at increased risk of progression and to provide oncological follow-up according to patient risk grou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva Mallen, Pedro Gil, Maria Jesus Gil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015-02-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100030&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1828544259228172288
author Eva Mallen
Pedro Gil
Maria Jesus Gil
author_facet Eva Mallen
Pedro Gil
Maria Jesus Gil
author_sort Eva Mallen
collection DOAJ
description Objective To stratify patients with bladder cancer into homogeneous risk groups according to statistically significant differences found in PFS (progression-free survival). To identify those patients at increased risk of progression and to provide oncological follow-up according to patient risk group. Materials and Methods A retrospective study of 563 patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). In order to determine which factors might predict bladder tumour progression and death, uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. The risk groups were identified according to “inter-category” differences found in PFS and lack of differences, thus revealing intra-category homogeneity. Results Median follow up time was 37.8 months. Recurrence occurred in a total of 219 patients (38, 9%). In 63% of cases this was distant recurrence. Only two variables retained independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis for PFS: pathological organ confinement and lymph node involvement. By combining these two variables, we created a new “risk group” variable. In this second model it was found that the new variable behaved as an independent predictor associated with PFS. Four risk groups were identified: very low, low, intermediate and high risk: • Very low risk: pT0 N0 • Low risk: pTa, pTis, pT1, pT2 and pN0 • Intermediate risk: pT3 and pN0 • High risk: pT4 N0 or pN1-3. Conclusions We retrospectively identified 4 risk groups with an independent prognostic value for progression-free survival following RC. Differences in recurrence patterns after RC between risk groups have led us to set different intervals in monitoring for cancer.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T02:26:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-693ec985b037437b942ef435132300b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-6119
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T02:26:49Z
publishDate 2015-02-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format Article
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-693ec985b037437b942ef435132300b12022-12-22T00:41:31ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61192015-02-01411303910.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.06S1677-55382015000100030Risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomyEva MallenPedro GilMaria Jesus GilObjective To stratify patients with bladder cancer into homogeneous risk groups according to statistically significant differences found in PFS (progression-free survival). To identify those patients at increased risk of progression and to provide oncological follow-up according to patient risk group. Materials and Methods A retrospective study of 563 patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). In order to determine which factors might predict bladder tumour progression and death, uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. The risk groups were identified according to “inter-category” differences found in PFS and lack of differences, thus revealing intra-category homogeneity. Results Median follow up time was 37.8 months. Recurrence occurred in a total of 219 patients (38, 9%). In 63% of cases this was distant recurrence. Only two variables retained independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis for PFS: pathological organ confinement and lymph node involvement. By combining these two variables, we created a new “risk group” variable. In this second model it was found that the new variable behaved as an independent predictor associated with PFS. Four risk groups were identified: very low, low, intermediate and high risk: • Very low risk: pT0 N0 • Low risk: pTa, pTis, pT1, pT2 and pN0 • Intermediate risk: pT3 and pN0 • High risk: pT4 N0 or pN1-3. Conclusions We retrospectively identified 4 risk groups with an independent prognostic value for progression-free survival following RC. Differences in recurrence patterns after RC between risk groups have led us to set different intervals in monitoring for cancer.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100030&lng=en&tlng=enUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystectomyPathology
spellingShingle Eva Mallen
Pedro Gil
Maria Jesus Gil
Risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Cystectomy
Pathology
title Risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy
title_full Risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy
title_fullStr Risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy
title_short Risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy
title_sort risk groups in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy
topic Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Cystectomy
Pathology
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100030&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT evamallen riskgroupsinbladdercancerpatientstreatedwithradicalcystectomy
AT pedrogil riskgroupsinbladdercancerpatientstreatedwithradicalcystectomy
AT mariajesusgil riskgroupsinbladdercancerpatientstreatedwithradicalcystectomy