New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications

Abstract The use of the scan-sampling method, especially when a large amount of data is collected, has become widespread in behavioral studies. However, there are no specific guidelines regarding the choice of the sampling interval in different conditions. Thus, establishing a standard approach for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alice Cartoni Mancinelli, Angela Trocino, Laura Menchetti, Diletta Chiattelli, Claudia Ciarelli, Cesare Castellini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44126-2
_version_ 1797453211411415040
author Alice Cartoni Mancinelli
Angela Trocino
Laura Menchetti
Diletta Chiattelli
Claudia Ciarelli
Cesare Castellini
author_facet Alice Cartoni Mancinelli
Angela Trocino
Laura Menchetti
Diletta Chiattelli
Claudia Ciarelli
Cesare Castellini
author_sort Alice Cartoni Mancinelli
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The use of the scan-sampling method, especially when a large amount of data is collected, has become widespread in behavioral studies. However, there are no specific guidelines regarding the choice of the sampling interval in different conditions. Thus, establishing a standard approach for video analysis represents an important step forward within the scientific community. In the present work, we hypothesized that the length of the sampling interval could influence the results of chicken behavioral study, for which we evaluated the reliability, accuracy, and validity of three different sampling intervals (10, 15 and 30 min). The Bland–Altman test was proposed as an innovative approach to compare sampling intervals and support researcher choices. Moreover, these sampling intervals were applied to compare the behavior of 4 chicken genotypes kept under free-range conditions. The Bland–Altman plots suggested that sampling intervals greater than 10 min lead to biases in the estimation of rare behaviors, such as “Attacking”. In contrast, the 30-min sampling interval was able to detect differences among genotypes in high-occurrence behaviors, such as those associated with locomotory activity. Thus, from a practical viewpoint, when a broad characterization of chicken genotypes is required, the 30-min scan-sampling interval might be suggested as a good compromise between resources and results.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:19:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-694d6cf05daf4222bbff3ebf8a89f592
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:19:31Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-694d6cf05daf4222bbff3ebf8a89f5922023-11-26T12:54:18ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-10-0113111310.1038/s41598-023-44126-2New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implicationsAlice Cartoni Mancinelli0Angela Trocino1Laura Menchetti2Diletta Chiattelli3Claudia Ciarelli4Cesare Castellini5Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of PerugiaDepartment of Agronomy Food Natural Resources Animal and Environment (DAFNAE), University of PadovaSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of CamerinoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of PerugiaDepartment of Agronomy Food Natural Resources Animal and Environment (DAFNAE), University of PadovaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of PerugiaAbstract The use of the scan-sampling method, especially when a large amount of data is collected, has become widespread in behavioral studies. However, there are no specific guidelines regarding the choice of the sampling interval in different conditions. Thus, establishing a standard approach for video analysis represents an important step forward within the scientific community. In the present work, we hypothesized that the length of the sampling interval could influence the results of chicken behavioral study, for which we evaluated the reliability, accuracy, and validity of three different sampling intervals (10, 15 and 30 min). The Bland–Altman test was proposed as an innovative approach to compare sampling intervals and support researcher choices. Moreover, these sampling intervals were applied to compare the behavior of 4 chicken genotypes kept under free-range conditions. The Bland–Altman plots suggested that sampling intervals greater than 10 min lead to biases in the estimation of rare behaviors, such as “Attacking”. In contrast, the 30-min sampling interval was able to detect differences among genotypes in high-occurrence behaviors, such as those associated with locomotory activity. Thus, from a practical viewpoint, when a broad characterization of chicken genotypes is required, the 30-min scan-sampling interval might be suggested as a good compromise between resources and results.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44126-2
spellingShingle Alice Cartoni Mancinelli
Angela Trocino
Laura Menchetti
Diletta Chiattelli
Claudia Ciarelli
Cesare Castellini
New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications
Scientific Reports
title New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications
title_full New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications
title_fullStr New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications
title_full_unstemmed New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications
title_short New approaches to selecting a scan-sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications
title_sort new approaches to selecting a scan sampling method for chicken behavioral observations and their practical implications
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44126-2
work_keys_str_mv AT alicecartonimancinelli newapproachestoselectingascansamplingmethodforchickenbehavioralobservationsandtheirpracticalimplications
AT angelatrocino newapproachestoselectingascansamplingmethodforchickenbehavioralobservationsandtheirpracticalimplications
AT lauramenchetti newapproachestoselectingascansamplingmethodforchickenbehavioralobservationsandtheirpracticalimplications
AT dilettachiattelli newapproachestoselectingascansamplingmethodforchickenbehavioralobservationsandtheirpracticalimplications
AT claudiaciarelli newapproachestoselectingascansamplingmethodforchickenbehavioralobservationsandtheirpracticalimplications
AT cesarecastellini newapproachestoselectingascansamplingmethodforchickenbehavioralobservationsandtheirpracticalimplications