Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

It has been 25 years since the U.S. Congress passed the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, an amendment to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, which mandated that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test all pesticide chemicals used in food for endocrine disruption. Soon after the law passed,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maricel V. Maffini, Laura N. Vandenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Toxicology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ftox.2022.908439/full
_version_ 1811324807432634368
author Maricel V. Maffini
Laura N. Vandenberg
author_facet Maricel V. Maffini
Laura N. Vandenberg
author_sort Maricel V. Maffini
collection DOAJ
description It has been 25 years since the U.S. Congress passed the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, an amendment to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, which mandated that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test all pesticide chemicals used in food for endocrine disruption. Soon after the law passed, EPA established the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC) to provide recommendations to the agency on how its Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) should work. Among them, the committee recommended that EDSP screening should 1) evaluate both human and ecological effects; 2) test for disruption of the estrogen, androgen, and thyroid systems; 3) evaluate pesticide and non-pesticide chemicals; and 4) implement a tiered approach. EPA adopted the recommendations and the EDSP was created in 1998. To date, the EPA has yet to fully implement the law; in other words, it has failed to test all pesticide chemicals for endocrine disruption. Of the small number that have been tested, not a single pesticide chemical has been determined to be an endocrine disruptor, and no regulatory actions have been taken. Here, we review the missed opportunities EPA had to make the EDSP a functional and effective program aimed at protecting human health and the environment. Two reports by the EPA’s Office of Inspector General from 2011 to 2021 provide the framework for our discussion.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:21:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-696c78a917d241b8805ec2548fb3f999
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-3080
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:21:48Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Toxicology
spelling doaj.art-696c78a917d241b8805ec2548fb3f9992022-12-22T02:43:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Toxicology2673-30802022-05-01410.3389/ftox.2022.908439908439Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyMaricel V. Maffini0Laura N. Vandenberg1Independent Consultant, Frederick, MD, United StatesUniversity of Massachusetts—Amherst, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, MA, United StatesIt has been 25 years since the U.S. Congress passed the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, an amendment to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, which mandated that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test all pesticide chemicals used in food for endocrine disruption. Soon after the law passed, EPA established the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC) to provide recommendations to the agency on how its Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) should work. Among them, the committee recommended that EDSP screening should 1) evaluate both human and ecological effects; 2) test for disruption of the estrogen, androgen, and thyroid systems; 3) evaluate pesticide and non-pesticide chemicals; and 4) implement a tiered approach. EPA adopted the recommendations and the EDSP was created in 1998. To date, the EPA has yet to fully implement the law; in other words, it has failed to test all pesticide chemicals for endocrine disruption. Of the small number that have been tested, not a single pesticide chemical has been determined to be an endocrine disruptor, and no regulatory actions have been taken. Here, we review the missed opportunities EPA had to make the EDSP a functional and effective program aimed at protecting human health and the environment. Two reports by the EPA’s Office of Inspector General from 2011 to 2021 provide the framework for our discussion.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ftox.2022.908439/fullendocrine disrupting chemicalvalidationtest guidelinecumulative effectxenoestrogenFIFRA
spellingShingle Maricel V. Maffini
Laura N. Vandenberg
Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Frontiers in Toxicology
endocrine disrupting chemical
validation
test guideline
cumulative effect
xenoestrogen
FIFRA
title Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
title_full Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
title_fullStr Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
title_full_unstemmed Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
title_short Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
title_sort failure to launch the endocrine disruptor screening program at the u s environmental protection agency
topic endocrine disrupting chemical
validation
test guideline
cumulative effect
xenoestrogen
FIFRA
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ftox.2022.908439/full
work_keys_str_mv AT maricelvmaffini failuretolaunchtheendocrinedisruptorscreeningprogramattheusenvironmentalprotectionagency
AT lauranvandenberg failuretolaunchtheendocrinedisruptorscreeningprogramattheusenvironmentalprotectionagency