Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern China

To understand the epidemiology of tick infestation and tick-borne diseases in pet dogs in south-eastern China and to develop a reference for their prevention and treatment, we collected 1550 ticks parasitizing 562 dogs in 122 veterinary clinics from 20 cities of south-eastern China. Dogs were tested...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang Jianwei, Liu Qingbiao, Wang Demou, Li Wanmeng, Beugnet Frédéric, Zhou Jinlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:Parasite
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017036
_version_ 1797427495014760448
author Zhang Jianwei
Liu Qingbiao
Wang Demou
Li Wanmeng
Beugnet Frédéric
Zhou Jinlin
author_facet Zhang Jianwei
Liu Qingbiao
Wang Demou
Li Wanmeng
Beugnet Frédéric
Zhou Jinlin
author_sort Zhang Jianwei
collection DOAJ
description To understand the epidemiology of tick infestation and tick-borne diseases in pet dogs in south-eastern China and to develop a reference for their prevention and treatment, we collected 1550 ticks parasitizing 562 dogs in 122 veterinary clinics from 20 cities of south-eastern China. Dogs were tested for common tick-borne pathogens; collected ticks were identified and processed for the detection of tick-borne pathogens. The use of an in vitro ELISA diagnostic kit for antibody detection (SNAP®4Dx® Plus) on dog sera found the infection rates with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma spp. to be 0.4%, 1.3% and 2.7%, respectively. By using a specific ELISA method, the infection rate with Babesia gibsoni was 3.9%. Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, Haemaphysalis longicornis and Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides were the major tick species identified on pet dogs. PCR tests were conducted to detect five tick-borne pathogens in 617 ticks. The infection rate was 10.2% for E. canis, 3.4% for Anaplasma platys, 2.3% for B. gibsoni, 0.3% for B. burgdorferi s.l. and 0% for Babesia canis. Some ticks were co-infected with two (1.46%) or three pathogens (0.16%). These results indicate the infestation of pet dogs by ticks infected with tick-borne pathogens in south-eastern China, and the need for effective treatment and routine prevention of tick infestations in dogs.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:45:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6973edac2fed4050932f0d0bfd90ffc3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1776-1042
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:45:50Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series Parasite
spelling doaj.art-6973edac2fed4050932f0d0bfd90ffc32023-12-02T15:31:50ZengEDP SciencesParasite1776-10422017-01-01243510.1051/parasite/2017036parasite170059Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern ChinaZhang JianweiLiu QingbiaoWang DemouLi WanmengBeugnet FrédéricZhou JinlinTo understand the epidemiology of tick infestation and tick-borne diseases in pet dogs in south-eastern China and to develop a reference for their prevention and treatment, we collected 1550 ticks parasitizing 562 dogs in 122 veterinary clinics from 20 cities of south-eastern China. Dogs were tested for common tick-borne pathogens; collected ticks were identified and processed for the detection of tick-borne pathogens. The use of an in vitro ELISA diagnostic kit for antibody detection (SNAP®4Dx® Plus) on dog sera found the infection rates with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma spp. to be 0.4%, 1.3% and 2.7%, respectively. By using a specific ELISA method, the infection rate with Babesia gibsoni was 3.9%. Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, Haemaphysalis longicornis and Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides were the major tick species identified on pet dogs. PCR tests were conducted to detect five tick-borne pathogens in 617 ticks. The infection rate was 10.2% for E. canis, 3.4% for Anaplasma platys, 2.3% for B. gibsoni, 0.3% for B. burgdorferi s.l. and 0% for Babesia canis. Some ticks were co-infected with two (1.46%) or three pathogens (0.16%). These results indicate the infestation of pet dogs by ticks infected with tick-borne pathogens in south-eastern China, and the need for effective treatment and routine prevention of tick infestations in dogs.https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017036Tickstick-borne pathogenspet dogssouth-eastern Chinaepidemiological survey
spellingShingle Zhang Jianwei
Liu Qingbiao
Wang Demou
Li Wanmeng
Beugnet Frédéric
Zhou Jinlin
Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern China
Parasite
Ticks
tick-borne pathogens
pet dogs
south-eastern China
epidemiological survey
title Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern China
title_full Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern China
title_fullStr Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern China
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern China
title_short Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern China
title_sort epidemiological survey of ticks and tick borne pathogens in pet dogs in south eastern china
topic Ticks
tick-borne pathogens
pet dogs
south-eastern China
epidemiological survey
url https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017036
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjianwei epidemiologicalsurveyofticksandtickbornepathogensinpetdogsinsoutheasternchina
AT liuqingbiao epidemiologicalsurveyofticksandtickbornepathogensinpetdogsinsoutheasternchina
AT wangdemou epidemiologicalsurveyofticksandtickbornepathogensinpetdogsinsoutheasternchina
AT liwanmeng epidemiologicalsurveyofticksandtickbornepathogensinpetdogsinsoutheasternchina
AT beugnetfrederic epidemiologicalsurveyofticksandtickbornepathogensinpetdogsinsoutheasternchina
AT zhoujinlin epidemiologicalsurveyofticksandtickbornepathogensinpetdogsinsoutheasternchina